Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Cognitive theories assume a uniform processing bias across different samples, but the empirical support for this claim is rather weak and inconsistent. Therefore, coherence between biases across different cognitive domains in a sample of 133 non-depressed (Study 1) and a sample of 266 formerly depressed individuals (Study 2) was examined. In both studies, individuals were selected after a successful sad mood induction procedure. A Dot Probe task, an Emotional Stroop task and a self-referential Incidental Learning and Free Recall task were administered to all participants. Principle component analyses indicated coherence between attentional and memory bias in non-depressed, while in formerly depressed individuals distinct components for attentional biases and for memory bias were uncovered. The data suggest that in formerly depressed individuals, self-referent processing during encoding may be related to memory bias, whereas in non-depressed individuals memory bias may be related to both attentional bias and self-referent processing.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington. DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: New perspectives. In P. J. Clayton & J. E. Barrett (Eds.), Treatment of depression: Old controversies and new approaches (pp. 315–350). New York: Raven Press.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory manual (2nd ed.). Sabn Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Beevers, C. G., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Attentional bias and mood persistence as prospective predictors of dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 619–637. CrossRef
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., & Lee, S. C. (1997). Attentional biases for negative information in induced and naturally occurring dysphoria. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 911–927.
Ellis, A. J., Beevers, C. G., & Wells, T. T. (2011). Attention allocation and incidental recognition of emotional information in dysphoria. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35, 425–433. CrossRef
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299. CrossRef
First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1995). Structured clinical interview for DSM- IV axis I disorders— patient version 2.0 (SCID- 1/P). New York: Biometrics Research Dept, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Hertel, P. T., & Mathews, A. (2011). Cognitive bias modification: Past perspectives, current findings, and future applications. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 521–536. CrossRef
Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute, Psychology section, Department of Clinical Neuroscience.
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1994). Cognitive approached to emotiona and emotional disorders. Annual Review Psychology, 45, 25–50. CrossRef
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2002). Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 331–354. CrossRef
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review Clinical Psychology, 1, 167–195. CrossRef
Matt, G. E., Vazquez, C., & Campbell, W. K. (1992). Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 227–255. CrossRef
McCabe, S. B., Gotlib, A. H., & Martin, R. A. (2000). Cognitive vulnerability for depression: Deployment of attention as a function of history of depression and current mood state. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 427–444. CrossRef
Parrott, W., & Sabini, J. (1990). Mood and memory under natural conditions: Evidence for mood-incongruent recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 321–336. CrossRef
Phaf, R. H., van der Leij, A. R., Stienen, B. M. C., & Bierman, D. (2006). Positieve, neutrale en negatieve woorden bij minimale aanbieding: Een ordening door perceptuele clarificatie [Positive, neutral and negative words at minimal presentation levels: Ordering by perceptual clarification]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Technical Report, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Raven, J. C. (1958). Standard progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.
Schmukle, S. C. (2005). Unreliability of the dot probe task. European Journal of Personality, 19, 595–605. CrossRef
Segal, Z. V., & Ingram, R. E. (1994). Mood priming and construct activation in tests of cognitive vulnerability to unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 663–695. CrossRef
- Coherence Between Attentional and Memory Biases in Sad and Formerly Depressed Individuals
Janna N. Vrijsen
Iris van Oostrom
Eni S. Becker
- Springer US