Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-02-2014 | Uitgave 1/2014

Quality of Life Research 1/2014

Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 1/2014
Auteurs:
Jennifer L. Hay, Thomas M. Atkinson, Bryce B. Reeve, Sandra A. Mitchell, Tito R. Mendoza, Gordon Willis, Lori M. Minasian, Steven B. Clauser, Andrea Denicoff, Ann O’Mara, Alice Chen, Antonia V. Bennett, Diane B. Paul, Joshua Gagne, Lauren Rogak, Laura Sit, Vish Viswanath, Deborah Schrag, Ethan Basch, the NCI PRO-CTCAE Study Group
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1007/​s11136-013-0470-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
NCI PRO-CTCAE Study Group members are Cindy Geoghegan, Jeff A. Sloan (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA), Charles S. Cleeland (University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA), Amy P. Abernethy (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA), Deborah W. Bruner (University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA), Allison Barz (The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA), Amylou C. Dueck (Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA), and Yuelin Li (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA).

Abstract

Purpose

The National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is a library of question items that enables patient reporting of adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials. This study contributes content validity evidence of the PRO-CTCAE by incorporating cancer patient input of the relevance and comprehensiveness of the item library.

Methods

Cognitive interviews were conducted among patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy at multiple sites to evaluate comprehension, memory retrieval, judgment, and response mapping related to AE terms (e.g., nausea), attribute terms (regarding frequency, severity, or interference), response options, and recall period. Three interview rounds were conducted with ≥20 patients completing each item per round. Items were modified and retested if ≥3 patients exhibited cognitive difficulties or if experienced by ≤25 % patients.

Results

One hundred and twenty-seven patients participated (35 % ≤high school, 28 % non-white, and 59 % female). Most AE terms (63/80) generated no cognitive difficulties. The remaining 17 were modified without further difficulties by Round 3. Terms were comprehended regardless of education level. Attribute terms and response options required no modifications. Patient adherence to recall period (7 days) was improved when the reference period was incorporated.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence confirming comprehension of the US English language versions of items in the PRO-CTCAE library for measuring symptomatic AEs from the patient perspective within the context of cancer treatment. Several minor changes were made to the items to improve item clarity, comprehension, and ease of response judgment. This study helps to establish the content validity of PRO-CTCAE items for patient reporting of AEs during cancer treatment.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)
11136_2013_470_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2014

Quality of Life Research 1/2014 Naar de uitgave