Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Cognitive flexibility is operationalized in the neuropsychological literature as the ability to shift between modes of thinking and adapt to novel or changing environments. Religious belief systems consist of strict rules and rituals that offer adherents certainty, consistency, and stability. Consequently, we hypothesized that religious adherence and practice of repetitive religious rituals may be related to the persistence versus flexibility of one’s cognition. The present study investigated the extent to which tendencies towards cognitive flexibility versus persistence are related to three facets of religious life: religious affiliation, religious practice, and religious upbringing. In a large sample (N = 744), we found that religious disbelief was related to cognitive flexibility across three independent behavioural measures: the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Remote Associates Test, and Alternative Uses Test. Furthermore, lower frequency of religious service attendance was related to cognitive flexibility. When analysing participants’ religious upbringing in relation to their current religious affiliation, it was manifest that current affiliation was more influential than religious upbringing in all the measured facets of cognitive flexibility. The findings indicate that religious affiliation and engagement may shape and be shaped by cognitive control styles towards flexibility versus persistence, highlighting the tight links between flexibility of thought and religious ideologies.
Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnes, J. J., Dean, A. J., Nandam, L. S., O’Connell, R. G., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2011). The molecular genetics of executive function: Role of monoamine system genes. Biological Psychiatry, 69(12), e127-e143. CrossRef
Bouchard, T. J., McGue, M., Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Genetic and environmental influences and personality correlates. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 2(2), 88–98. CrossRef
Bouchard, T. J., Segal, N. L., Tellegen, A., McGue, M., Keyes, M., & Krueger, R. F. (2004). Genetic influence on social attitudes: Another challenge to psychology from behavior genetics. Behavior Genetics Principles Perspectives in Development Personality and Psychopathology, 89–104.
Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, 35(4), 634–639. CrossRef
Cools, R., Brouwer, W. H., De Jong, R., & Slooff, C. (2000). Flexibility, inhibition, and planning: Frontal dysfunctioning in schizophrenia. Brain and Cognition, 43(1–3), 108–112. PubMed
Cools, R., & Robbins, T. W. (2004). Chemistry of the adaptive mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 362(1825), 2871–2888. CrossRef
Dechesne, M., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., Ransom, S., Sheldon, K. M., Van Knippenberg, A., & Janssen, J. (2003). Literal and symbolic immortality: The effect of evidence of literal immortality on self-esteem striving in response to mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 722. CrossRefPubMed
Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 30(2), 343–352. CrossRef
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. CrossRef
Gervais, W. M., van Elk, M., Xygalatas, D., McKay, R., Aveyard, M., & Bulbulia, J. (2018) Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/92R8X.
Goschke, T. (2003). Voluntary action and cognitive control from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Voluntary action: Brains, minds, and sociality (pp. 49–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14. CrossRef
Guilford, J. P. (1971). Some misconceptions regarding measurement of creative talents. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 5(2), 77–87. CrossRef
Heaton, R. K. (1981). A manual for the Wisconsin card sorting test. Torrance: Western Psycological Services.
Heaton, R. K. (1993). Wisconsin card sorting test: computer version 2. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Heywood, B. T., & Bering, J. M. (2014). “Meant to be”: How religious beliefs and cultural religiosity affect the implicit bias to think teleologically. Religion Brain and Behavior, 4(3), 183–201. CrossRef
Hommel, B. (2015). Between persistence and flexibility: The Yin and Yang of action control. Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 33–67. CrossRef
Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2010). Religion as a control guide: On the impact of religion on cognition. Zygon®, 45(3), 596–604. CrossRef
Ionescu, T. (2012). Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 190–200. CrossRef
Isen, A. M. (1990). The influence of positive and negative affect on cognitive organization: Some implications for development. Psychological and Biological Approaches to Emotion, 75–94.
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. In Gifford lectures on natural religion, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland; the chapters in this text were presented at the aforementioned lectures in 1901–1902. UK: Green and Co, Longmans.
Jimenez, J., Gomez, A., Buhrmester, M. D., Vázquez, A., Whitehouse, H., & Swann, W. B. (2016). The dynamic identity fusion index: A new continuous measure of identity fusion for web-based questionnaires. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 215–228. CrossRef
Kapogiannis, D., Barbey, A. K., Su, M., Zamboni, G., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2009). Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(12), 4876–4881. CrossRef
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 264–268. CrossRef
Mednick, S. A. (1968). The remote associates test. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2(3), 213–214. CrossRef
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383. CrossRef
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39.
Rand, D. G., Dreber, A., Haque, O. S., Kane, R. J., Nowak, M. A., & Coakley, S. (2014). Religious motivations for cooperation: An experimental investigation using explicit primes. Religion Brain and Behavior, 4(1), 31–48. CrossRef
Rutjens, B. T., Van Der Pligt, J., & Van Harreveld, F. (2010). Deus or Darwin: Randomness and belief in theories about the origin of life. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1078–1080. CrossRef
Tomer, R., Fisher, T., Giladi, N., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). Dissociation between spontaneous and reactive flexibility in early Parkinson’s disease. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 15(2), 106–112.
Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of religiosity and the cognitive science of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 16(3), 321–335. CrossRef
Yonker, J. E., Edman, L. R., Cresswell, J., & Barrett, J. L. (2016). Primed analytic thought and religiosity: The importance of individual characteristics. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8(4), 298. CrossRef
Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2018). Cognitive underpinnings of nationalistic ideology in the context of Brexit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 18, 201708960; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708960115.
Zmigrod, L., & Zmigrod, S. (2016). On the temporal precision of thought: Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict performance on verbal and nonverbal problem solving tasks. Multisensory Research, 29(8), 679–701. CrossRef
- Cognitive flexibility and religious disbelief
P. Jason Rentfrow
Trevor W. Robbins
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Psychological Research
An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772