Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2-3/2004

01-04-2004 | Editorial

Cognitive control of action: The role of action effects

Auteurs: Dieter Nattkemper, Michael Ziessler

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2-3/2004

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Excerpt

Actions are performed to achieve desired goals, hence, to intentionally produce particular events or effects. By definition, an action effect can be attained only after the action has been executed. Yet experimental research on action control in the last two decades has provided considerable evidence that in voluntary action, representations of action effects seem to be involved before action execution starts, i.e., anticipatory representations of action effects seem to affect the selection and/or the planning of a motor action. Action effect representations have at least two functions. Firstly, after having executed a particular action, we need to compare the attained effects with the intended effects. Hence, anticipatory effect representations are involved in the evaluation of action results. Secondly, we plan and execute actions in a way that they are likely to produce the desired effects. Hence, anticipations of action goals are involved in action control. Both functions require the presence of a representation of an action goal that controls the selection and execution of given motor patterns. According to this reasoning, voluntary actions are controlled by some anticipatory representations that capture their intended and expected effects. This idea is usually referred to as the ideomotor approach to action control. Whereas the evaluative function plays a central role in all closed-loop theories of motor control and has been investigated in numerous experiments, empirical research on the ideomotor approach has been missing for a long time. This is surprising, since the theoretical roots of this approach go back to the beginning of the 19th century, and in 1890, James formulated his ideomotor principle (James, 1890). …
Literatuur
go back to reference Blakemore, S. J., Rees, G., Frith, C. D. (1998). How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study. Neuropsychologia, 36, 521–529.CrossRefPubMed Blakemore, S. J., Rees, G., Frith, C. D. (1998). How do we predict the consequences of our actions? A functional imaging study. Neuropsychologia, 36, 521–529.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dickinson, A., Balleine, B. W. (2000). Causal cognition and goal-directed action. In Heyes, C. & Huber, L. (Eds). The evolution of cognition. Vienna series in theoretical biology (pp. 185–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Dickinson, A., Balleine, B. W. (2000). Causal cognition and goal-directed action. In Heyes, C. & Huber, L. (Eds). The evolution of cognition. Vienna series in theoretical biology (pp. 185–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.PubMed Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937.PubMed
go back to reference James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
go back to reference O’Regan, J. K., & Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031.PubMed O’Regan, J. K., & Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031.PubMed
go back to reference Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahrmani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature: Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217.PubMed Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahrmani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature: Neuroscience, 3, 1212–1217.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Cognitive control of action: The role of action effects
Auteurs
Dieter Nattkemper
Michael Ziessler
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2004
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2-3/2004
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0145-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2-3/2004

Psychological Research 2-3/2004 Naar de uitgave