TODO: Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-09-2011

Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments

Auteurs: Jemaima Che Hamzah, Jennifer M. Burr, Craig R. Ramsay, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Maria Prior

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2011

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To identify vision Patient-Reported Outcomes instruments relevant to glaucoma and assess their content validity.

Methods

MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE and SCOPUS (to January 2009) were systematically searched. Observational studies or randomised controlled trials, published in English, reporting use of vision instruments in glaucoma studies involving adults were included. In addition, reference lists were scanned to identify additional studies describing development and/or validation to ascertain the final version of the instruments. Instruments’ content was then mapped onto a theoretical framework, the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Two reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and quality assessed instrument content.

Results

Thirty-three instruments were identified. Instruments were categorised into thirteen vision status, two vision disability, one vision satisfaction, five glaucoma status, one glaucoma medication related to health status, five glaucoma medication side effects and six glaucoma medication satisfaction measures according to each instruments’ content. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25, Impact of Vision Impairment and Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure had the highest number of positive ratings in the content validity assessment.

Conclusion

This study provides a descriptive catalogue of vision-specific PRO instruments, to inform the choice of an appropriate measure of patient-reported outcomes in a glaucoma context.
Literatuur
Deze inhoud is alleen zichtbaar als je bent ingelogd en de juiste rechten hebt.
Metagegevens
Titel
Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments
Auteurs
Jemaima Che Hamzah
Jennifer M. Burr
Craig R. Ramsay
Augusto Azuara-Blanco
Maria Prior
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2011
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9831-1