Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Children’s post-divorce living arrangements have become increasingly heterogeneous the past decades, because of the rise in shared residence and stepfamily formation. This study investigates how post-divorce living arrangements (i.e. the combination between residential arrangement and stepparent presence) are related to children’s school engagement. The focus is put on different explanations of the relation between living arrangements and school engagement, namely financial resources, parent–child relationship, selectivity and stress. Structural equation models are performed on a sample of children with divorced parents from the Leuven Adolescent and Family Study data 2008–2011 (n = 1630). First, the results show that stepfamilies have higher financial resources than single-parent families, but these higher financial resources are not directly related to children’s school engagement. Second, parent–child relationship is an important mediator between post-divorce living arrangements and school engagement. The results suggest that shared residence is related to a better fatherchild relationship and in this manner improves school engagement. The relation between stepparent presence and the parent–child relationship is less straightforward, and the findings suggest that the combination of residential arrangement, stepfather and stepmother presence should be taken into account. Third, children’s sociodemographic characteristics, time since divorce and level of pre-divorce conflict function as selection mechanisms, as they are related to both post-divorce living arrangements and children’s school engagement. Finally, the findings indicate that the complexity of multiple part-time residential figures is stressful to children. This may partially counterbalance the benefits of such systems, via the better parent–child relationship and the higher financial resources.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Aassve, A., Betti, G., Mazzuco, S., & Mencarini, L. (2007). Marital disruption and economic well-being: A comparative analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 170(3), 781–799. CrossRef
Amato, P. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. CrossRef
Amato, P., & Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children’s well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 557–573. CrossRef
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386. CrossRef
Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–278). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Artis, J. E. (2007). Maternal cohabitation and child well-being among kindergarten children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(1), 222–236. CrossRef
Bauserman, R. (2002). Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Family Psychology, 6(2), 91–102. CrossRef
Bender, W. N. (1994). Joint custody: The option of choice. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 21(3–4), 115–132. CrossRef
Bernardi, F., & Radl, J. (2014). The long-term consequences of parental divorce for children’s educational attainment. Demographic Research, 30(61), 1653–1680. CrossRef
Bianchi, S. M., Subaiya, L., & Kahn, J. R. (1999). The gender gap in the economic well-being of nonresident fathers and custodial mothers. Demography, 36(2), 195–203.
Bjarnason, T., & Arnarsson, A. M. (2011). Joint physical custody and communication with parents: A cross-national study of children in 36 Western countries. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42(6), 871–890.
Brooks-Gunn, J., Klebanov, P., & Liaw, F. (1995). The learning, physical, and emotional environment of the home in the context of poverty: The infant health and development program. Children and Youth Services Review, 17(1/2), 251–276. CrossRef
Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. London: Paperback Spon Pres.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. CrossRef
Brutsaert, H. (1993). School, gezin en welbevinden: Zesdeklassers en hun sociale omgeving. Leuven: Garant.
Buchanan, C. (1992). Adolescents and their families after divorce: Three residential arrangements compared. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2(3), 261–291. CrossRef
Cavanagh, S., & Fomby, P. (2012). Family instability, school context, and the academic careers of adolescents. Sociology of Education, 85(1), 81–97. CrossRef
Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1288–1307. CrossRef
Crosbie-Burnett, M. (1991). Impact of joint versus sole custody and quality of co-parental relationship on adjustment of adolescents in remarried families. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 9(4), 439–449. CrossRef
Dewilde, C., & Uunk, W. (2008). Remarriage as a way to overcome the financial consequences of divorce: A test of the economic need hypothesis for European women. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 393–407. CrossRef
Donnelly, D., & Finkelhor, D. (1992). Does equality in custody arrangement improve the parent-child relationship? Journal of Marriage and Family, 54(4), 837–845. CrossRef
Donnelly, D., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Who has joint custody? Class differences in the determination of custody arrangements. Family Relations, 42(1), 57–60. CrossRef
Enders, C., & Bandalos, D. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457. CrossRef
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. CrossRef
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York, NY: Springer. CrossRef
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children’s perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21(6), 1016–1024.
Greif, J., & Simring, S. (1982). Remarriage and joint custody. Conciliation Courts Review, 20(1), 9–14. CrossRef
Groenez, S. (2010). Onderwijsexpansie en -democratisering in Vlaanderen. Tijdschrift Voor Sociologie, 31(3–4), 199–238.
Havermans, N., Botterman, S., & Matthijs, K. (2014). Family resources as mediators in the relation between divorce and children’s school engagement. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 564–579. CrossRef
Havermans, N., Vanassche, S., & Matthijs, K. (2015). Methodological challenges of including children in family research: Measurement equivalence, selection bias and social desirability. Child Indicators Research, 8(4), 975–997. CrossRef
Heard, H. E. (2007). The family structure trajectory and adolescent school performance: Differential effects by race and ethnicity. Journal of Family Issues, 28(3), 319–354. CrossRef
Hetherington, E. M., & Kelly, J. (2002). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York, NY: Norton.
Jensen, A.-M. (2009). Mobile children: Small captives of large structures? Children & Society, 23(2), 123–135. CrossRef
Juby, H., Billette, J.-M., Laplante, B., & Le Bourdais, C. (2007). Nonresident fathers and children: Parents’ new unions and frequency of contact. Journal of Family Issues, 28(9), 1220–1245. CrossRef
Juby, H., Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil-Graton, N. (2005). Sharing roles, sharing custody? Couples’ characteristics and children’s living arrangements at separation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 157–172. CrossRef
Kelly, J., & Emery, R. (2003). Children’s adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspectives. Family Relations, 52(4), 352–362. CrossRef
Kline, M., Tschann, J. M., Johnston, J. R., & Wallerstein, J. S. (1989). Children’s adjustment in joint and sole physical custody families. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 430–438. CrossRef
Lodewijckx, E. (2005). Kinderen en scheiding bij hun ouders in het Vlaamse Gewest. Een analyse op basis van Rijksregistergegevens. Brussels: Centrum voor Bevolkings- en Gezinsstudies.
Manning, W. D., & Brown, S. (2006). Children’s economic well-being in married and cohabiting parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(2), 345–362. CrossRef
McLanahan, S. S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mo, Y., & Singh, K. (2008). Parents’ relationships and involvement: Effects on students’ school engagement and performance. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 31(10), 1–11.
Murray, C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(3), 376–404. CrossRef
Muthen, L., & Muthen, B. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. 5th. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Nielsen, L. (2011). Shared parenting after divorce: A review of shared residential parenting research. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 52(8), 586–609. CrossRef
Osborne, C., & Mclanahan, S. S. (2007). Partnership instability and child well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(4), 1065–1083. CrossRef
Parcel, T. L., Dufur, M. J., & Cornell Zito, R. (2010). Capital at home and at school: A review and synthesis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 828–846. CrossRef
Prskawetz, A., Vikat, A., Philipov, D., & Engelhardt, H. (2003). Pathways to stepfamily formation in Europe. Demographic Research, 8(5), 107–150. CrossRef
Raufelder, D., Kittler, F., Braun, S. R., Latsch, A., Wilkinson, R. P., & Hoferichter, F. (2013). The interplay of perceived stress, self-determination and school engagement in adolescence. School Psychology International, 35(4), 405–420. CrossRef
Seltzer, J. (1991). Legal custody arrangements and children’s economic welfare. American Journal of Sociology, 96(4), 895–929. CrossRef
Sigle-Rushton, W., Lyngstad, T. H., Andersen, P. L., & Kravdal, Ø. (2014). Proceed with caution? Parents’ union dissolution and children’s educational achievement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 161–174. CrossRef
Simons-Morton, B., & Chen, R. (2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 41(1), 3–25. CrossRef
Sobolewski, J. M., & King, V. (2005). The importance of the coparental relationship for nonresident fathers’ ties to children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1196–1212. CrossRef
Sodermans, A. K., Botterman, S., Havermans, N., & Matthijs, K. (2015). Involved fathers, liberated mothers? Joint physical custody and the subjective well-being of divorced parents. Social Indicators Research, 122(1), 257–277. CrossRef
Sodermans, A. K., Matthijs, K., & Swicegood, G. (2013). Characteristics of joint physical custody families in Flanders. Demographic Research, 28(29), 821–848. CrossRef
Sodermans, A. K., Vanassche, S., & Matthijs, K. (2013). Post-divorce custody arrangements and binuclear family structures of Flemish adolescents. Demographic Research, 28(15), 421–432. CrossRef
Sodermans, A. K., Vanassche, S., Matthijs, K., & Swicegood, G. (2014). Measuring postdivorce living arrangements: Theoretical and empirical validation of the residential calendar. Journal of Family Issues, 35(1), 125–145. CrossRef
Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 125–146. CrossRef
Spruijt, E., & Duindam, V. (2009). Joint physical custody in the Netherlands and the well-being of children. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 51(1), 65–82. CrossRef
Sweeney, M. M. (2010). Remarriage and stepfamilies: Strategic sites for family scholarship in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 667–684. CrossRef
Thomson, E., Mosley, J., Hanson, T. L., & McLanahan, S. S. (2001). Remarriage, cohabitation, and changes in mothering behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 370–380. CrossRef
Tschann, J. M., Johnston, J. R., & Wallerstein, J. S. (1989). Resources, stressors, and attachment as predictors of adult adjustment after divorce: A longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(4), 1033–1046. CrossRef
Vanassche, S. (2013). Stepfamily configurations and trajectories following divorce. A quantitative study on stepfamily situations, stepfamily relationships and the wellbeing of children. Leuven: KU Leuven.
Vanassche, S., Corijn, M., Matthijs, K., & Swicegood, G. (2015). Repartnering and childbearing after divorce: Differences according to parental status and custodial arrangements. Population Research and Policy Review, 34, 761–784. CrossRef
Vanassche, S., Sodermans, A. K., Dekeyser, G., & Matthijs, K. (2012). Methodologische documenten Leuvens Adolescenten en Gezinnenonderzoek [Methodological documents Leuven adolescent and family study]. Leuven: Centrum voor Sociologisch Onderzoek.
Vandenbroucke, F., & Vinck, J. (2013). Child poverty risks in Belgium, Wallonia, Flanders: Accounting for a worrying performance. In P. Maystadt, B. Cantillon, L. Denayer, P. Pestieau, B. Van der Linden, & M. Cattelain (Eds.), Le modèle social belge: Quel avenir? (Vol. 53, pp. 85–144). Charleroi: Presses interuniversitaires de Charleroi.
- Children’s Post-Divorce Living Arrangements and School Engagement: Financial Resources, Parent–Child Relationship, Selectivity and Stress
- Springer US