Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence 10/2017

07-04-2017 | Empirical Research

Children’s and Adolescents’ Expectations about Challenging Unfair Group Norms

Auteurs: Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Melanie Killen

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 10/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Youth often hold group norms that perpetuate inequality. One way these norms can be changed is by challenging these norms by choosing to include new members into these groups who hold morally just norms. In the current study, children’s and adolescents’ inclusion decisions and social reasoning about challenging group norms through inclusion were investigated. The sample included 9–10 (children) and 13–14 year-olds (adolescents) (N = 673, 54.4% female). Participants supported including challengers into groups holding norms supporting relational aggression and unequal allocation of resources, but they were less likely to support including a challenger into a physically aggressive group. Age-related differences and gender differences were found: children and female participants were more likely to include challengers than were adolescents and male participants. The findings indicate that youth support including new members who would challenge morally questionable group norms, but that their support depends on the specific norm the group holds.
Literatuur
go back to reference Abbott, N., & Cameron, L. (2014). What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in‐group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 167–182.CrossRef Abbott, N., & Cameron, L. (2014). What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in‐group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 167–182.CrossRef
go back to reference Abrams, D., & Rutland, A. (2008). The development of subjective group dynamics. In S. R. Levy, & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup relations and attitudes in childhood through adulthood (pp. 47–65). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Abrams, D., & Rutland, A. (2008). The development of subjective group dynamics. In S. R. Levy, & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup relations and attitudes in childhood through adulthood (pp. 47–65). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Abrams, D., Rutland, A., & Cameron, L. (2003a). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children’s judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals. Child Development, 74, 1840–1856.CrossRefPubMed Abrams, D., Rutland, A., & Cameron, L. (2003a). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children’s judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals. Child Development, 74, 1840–1856.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Cameron, L., & Marques, J. M. (2003b). The development of subjective group dynamics: When in-group bias gets specific. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 155.CrossRef Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Cameron, L., & Marques, J. M. (2003b). The development of subjective group dynamics: When in-group bias gets specific. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 155.CrossRef
go back to reference Barhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., Grassetti, S. N., & Morrow, M. T. (2015). Relations between actual group norms, perceived peer behavior, and bystander children’s intervention to bullying. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 1-7. 10.1080/15374416.2015.1046180 Barhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., Grassetti, S. N., & Morrow, M. T. (2015). Relations between actual group norms, perceived peer behavior, and bystander children’s intervention to bullying. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 1-7. 10.​1080/​15374416.​2015.​1046180
go back to reference Bennett, M., & Sani, F. (2008). Children’s subjective identification with social groups. In S. Levy, M. Killen (Eds.). Intergroup attitudes and relationships from childhood through adulthood (pp. 19–31). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Bennett, M., & Sani, F. (2008). Children’s subjective identification with social groups. In S. Levy, M. Killen (Eds.). Intergroup attitudes and relationships from childhood through adulthood (pp. 19–31). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Bourhis, R. Y., & Gagnon, A. (2001). Social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. In R. B. S. Gaertner (Ed.). Intergroup processes: Blackwell handbook in social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 89–111). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers. Bourhis, R. Y., & Gagnon, A. (2001). Social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. In R. B. S. Gaertner (Ed.). Intergroup processes: Blackwell handbook in social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 89–111). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
go back to reference Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1–13. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.1.CrossRef Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1–13. doi:10.​1037/​0022-0663.​98.​1.​1.CrossRef
go back to reference Choukas-Bradley, S., Giletta, M., Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Peer influence, peer status, and prosocial behavior: An experimental investigation of peer socialization of adolescents’ intentions to volunteer. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2197–2210. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0373-2.CrossRefPubMed Choukas-Bradley, S., Giletta, M., Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Peer influence, peer status, and prosocial behavior: An experimental investigation of peer socialization of adolescents’ intentions to volunteer. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2197–2210. doi:10.​1007/​s10964-015-0373-2.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Elenbaas, L., & Killen, M. (2016). Research in developmental psychology: Social exclusion among children and adolescents. In P. Riva, & J. Eck (Eds.). Social exclusion: Psychological approaches to understanding and reducing its impact (pp. 89–108). NY: Springer Publishing Company.CrossRef Elenbaas, L., & Killen, M. (2016). Research in developmental psychology: Social exclusion among children and adolescents. In P. Riva, & J. Eck (Eds.). Social exclusion: Psychological approaches to understanding and reducing its impact (pp. 89–108). NY: Springer Publishing Company.CrossRef
go back to reference Gasser, L., Malti, T., & Buholzer, A. (2013). Children’s moral judgments and moral emotions following exclusion of children with disabilities: Relations with inclusive education, age, and contact intensity. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 948–958. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.11.017.CrossRefPubMed Gasser, L., Malti, T., & Buholzer, A. (2013). Children’s moral judgments and moral emotions following exclusion of children with disabilities: Relations with inclusive education, age, and contact intensity. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 948–958. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ridd.​2012.​11.​017.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gasser, L., Malti, T., & Buholzer, A. (2014). Swiss children’s moral and psychological judgments about inclusion and exclusion of children with disabilities. Child Development, 85, 532–548. doi:10.1111/cdev.12124.CrossRefPubMed Gasser, L., Malti, T., & Buholzer, A. (2014). Swiss children’s moral and psychological judgments about inclusion and exclusion of children with disabilities. Child Development, 85, 532–548. doi:10.​1111/​cdev.​12124.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hitti, A., Mulvey, K. L., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2014). When is it okay to exclude a member of the ingroup? Children’s and adolescents’ social reasoning. Social Development, 23, 451–469. doi:10.1111/sode.12047.CrossRef Hitti, A., Mulvey, K. L., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2014). When is it okay to exclude a member of the ingroup? Children’s and adolescents’ social reasoning. Social Development, 23, 451–469. doi:10.​1111/​sode.​12047.CrossRef
go back to reference Horn, S. S. (2006). Group status, group bias, and adolescents’ reasoning about the treatment of others in school contexts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 208–218.CrossRef Horn, S. S. (2006). Group status, group bias, and adolescents’ reasoning about the treatment of others in school contexts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 208–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Horn, S. S. (2008). The multifaceted nature of sexual prejudice: How adolescents reason about sexual orientation and sexual prejudice. In S. R. Levy, & M. Killen (Eds.). Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 173–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Horn, S. S. (2008). The multifaceted nature of sexual prejudice: How adolescents reason about sexual orientation and sexual prejudice. In S. R. Levy, & M. Killen (Eds.). Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 173–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Horn, S. S., & Sinno, S. (2014). Gender, sexual oriention and discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation. In M. Killen, & J. G. Smetana (Eds.). The handbook of moral development. (2nd ed. pp. 317–339). New York: Taylor and Francis. Horn, S. S., & Sinno, S. (2014). Gender, sexual oriention and discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation. In M. Killen, & J. G. Smetana (Eds.). The handbook of moral development. (2nd ed. pp. 317–339). New York: Taylor and Francis.
go back to reference Killen, M., Kelly, M. C., Richardson, C., Crystal, D., & Ruck, M. (2010). European American children’s and adolescents’ evaluations of interracial exclusion. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 283–300. doi:10.1177/1368430209346700.CrossRef Killen, M., Kelly, M. C., Richardson, C., Crystal, D., & Ruck, M. (2010). European American children’s and adolescents’ evaluations of interracial exclusion. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 283–300. doi:10.​1177/​1368430209346700​.CrossRef
go back to reference Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2011). Children and social exclusion: Morality, prejudice, and group identity. New York, NY: Wiley/Blackwell Publishers.CrossRef Killen, M., & Rutland, A. (2011). Children and social exclusion: Morality, prejudice, and group identity. New York, NY: Wiley/Blackwell Publishers.CrossRef
go back to reference Killen, M., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., Mulvey, K. L., & Hitti, A. (2013). Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms. Child Development, 84, 1063–1080. doi:10.1111/cdev.12011.CrossRefPubMed Killen, M., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., Mulvey, K. L., & Hitti, A. (2013). Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms. Child Development, 84, 1063–1080. doi:10.​1111/​cdev.​12011.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Malete, L., Chow, G. M., & Feltz, D. L. (2013). Influence of coaching efficacy and coaching competency on athlete‐level moral variables in Botswana youth soccer. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2107–2119. doi:10.1111/jasp.12164.CrossRef Malete, L., Chow, G. M., & Feltz, D. L. (2013). Influence of coaching efficacy and coaching competency on athlete‐level moral variables in Botswana youth soccer. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2107–2119. doi:10.​1111/​jasp.​12164.CrossRef
go back to reference Malti, T., Strohmeier, D., & Killen, M. (2015). The impact of onlooking and including bystander behaviour on judgments and emotions regarding peer exclusion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 295–311. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12090.CrossRefPubMed Malti, T., Strohmeier, D., & Killen, M. (2015). The impact of onlooking and including bystander behaviour on judgments and emotions regarding peer exclusion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 295–311. doi:10.​1111/​bjdp.​12090.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Meidenbauer, K. L., Cowell, J. M., Killen, M., & Decety, J. (2016). A developmental neuroscience study of moral decision making regarding resource allocation. Child Development. doi:10.1111/cdev.12698.PubMed Meidenbauer, K. L., Cowell, J. M., Killen, M., & Decety, J. (2016). A developmental neuroscience study of moral decision making regarding resource allocation. Child Development. doi:10.​1111/​cdev.​12698.PubMed
go back to reference Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., & Killen, M. (2013). Intentionality, morality, and exclusion: How children navigate the social world. In M. Banaji, & S. Gelman (Eds.). Navigating the social world: What infants, children and other species can teach us (pp. 377–384). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., & Killen, M. (2013). Intentionality, morality, and exclusion: How children navigate the social world. In M. Banaji, & S. Gelman (Eds.). Navigating the social world: What infants, children and other species can teach us (pp. 377–384). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2014a). Context differences in children’s ingroup preferences. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1507–1519. doi:10.1037/a0035593.CrossRefPubMed Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2014a). Context differences in children’s ingroup preferences. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1507–1519. doi:10.​1037/​a0035593.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2014b). Reasoning about resource allocation in an intergroup context from an individual and a group perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 29–46. doi:10.1111/josi.12045.CrossRef Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., Rutland, A., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2014b). Reasoning about resource allocation in an intergroup context from an individual and a group perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 29–46. doi:10.​1111/​josi.​12045.CrossRef
go back to reference Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., Smetana, J., & Killen, M. (2016a). Morality, context and development. In L. Balter, & C. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.). Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues. (3rd ed. pp. 285–304). NY: Psychology Press. Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., Smetana, J., & Killen, M. (2016a). Morality, context and development. In L. Balter, & C. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.). Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues. (3rd ed. pp. 285–304). NY: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Mulvey, K. L., & Killen, M. (2016). Keeping quiet just wouldn’t be right: Children’s and adolescents’ evaluations of challenges to peer relational and physical aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10964-016-0437-y Mulvey, K. L., & Killen, M. (2016). Keeping quiet just wouldn’t be right: Children’s and adolescents’ evaluations of challenges to peer relational and physical aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1–12. doi:10.​1007/​s10964-016-0437-y
go back to reference Nesdale, D., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. & Roxburgh, N. (2014). Peer Group Rejection in Childhood: Effects of Rejection Ambiguity, Rejection Sensitivity, and Social Acumen. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 12–28. doi:10.1111/josi.12044 Nesdale, D., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. & Roxburgh, N. (2014). Peer Group Rejection in Childhood: Effects of Rejection Ambiguity, Rejection Sensitivity, and Social Acumen. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 12–28. doi:10.​1111/​josi.​12044
go back to reference Oh, W., Rubin, K. H., Bowker, J. C., Booth-LaForce, C., Rose-Krasno, L., & Laursen, B. (2008). Trajectories of social withdrawal from middle childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 553–566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oh, W., Rubin, K. H., Bowker, J. C., Booth-LaForce, C., Rose-Krasno, L., & Laursen, B. (2008). Trajectories of social withdrawal from middle childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 553–566.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Richardson, C., Mulvey, K. L., & Killen, M. (2012). Extending social-domain theory with a process-based account of moral judgment. Human Development, 55, 4–25. doi:10.1159/000335362.CrossRef Richardson, C., Mulvey, K. L., & Killen, M. (2012). Extending social-domain theory with a process-based account of moral judgment. Human Development, 55, 4–25. doi:10.​1159/​000335362.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. (2006). Gender development. In W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.). Handbook of child psychology: personality and social development. (Vol. 3, pp. 858–932, 6th ed.). New York: Wiley Publishers. Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. (2006). Gender development. In W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.). Handbook of child psychology: personality and social development. (Vol. 3, pp. 858–932, 6th ed.). New York: Wiley Publishers.
go back to reference Rutland, A., Hitti, A., Mulvey, K. L., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2015). When does the in-group like the out-group?: Bias among children as a function of group norms. Psychological Science 26, 834–842. Rutland, A., Hitti, A., Mulvey, K. L., Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2015). When does the in-group like the out-group?: Bias among children as a function of group norms. Psychological Science 26, 834–842.
go back to reference Rutland, A., & Killen, M. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: Intergroup processes, social‐cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 121–154. doi:10.1111/sipr.12012.CrossRef Rutland, A., & Killen, M. (2015). A developmental science approach to reducing prejudice and social exclusion: Intergroup processes, social‐cognitive development, and moral reasoning. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 121–154. doi:10.​1111/​sipr.​12012.CrossRef
go back to reference Rutland, A., Killen, M., & Abrams, D. (2010). A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: The interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 279–291. doi:10.1177/1745691610369468.CrossRefPubMed Rutland, A., Killen, M., & Abrams, D. (2010). A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: The interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 279–291. doi:10.​1177/​1745691610369468​.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Saarento, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The role of classroom peer ecology and bystanders’ responses to bullying. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 201–205. doi:10.1111/cdep.12140.CrossRef Saarento, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The role of classroom peer ecology and bystanders’ responses to bullying. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 201–205. doi:10.​1111/​cdep.​12140.CrossRef
go back to reference Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668–676. doi:10.1080/15374416.2011.597090.CrossRefPubMed Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668–676. doi:10.​1080/​15374416.​2011.​597090.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shaw, L. A., & Wainryb, C. (2006). When victims don’t cry: Children’s understandings of victimization, compliance, and subversion. Child Development, 77, 1050–1062.CrossRefPubMed Shaw, L. A., & Wainryb, C. (2006). When victims don’t cry: Children’s understandings of victimization, compliance, and subversion. Child Development, 77, 1050–1062.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen, & J. G. Smetana (Eds.). Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen, & J. G. Smetana (Eds.). Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen, & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development. (2nd ed. pp. 23–45). New York: Psychology Press. Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen, & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development. (2nd ed. pp. 23–45). New York: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Sønderlund, A. L., O’Brien, K., Kremer, P., Rowland, B., De Groot, F., & Staiger, P., et al. (2014). The association between sports participation, alcohol use and aggression and violence: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 17, 2–7. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2013.03.011.CrossRefPubMed Sønderlund, A. L., O’Brien, K., Kremer, P., Rowland, B., De Groot, F., & Staiger, P., et al. (2014). The association between sports participation, alcohol use and aggression and violence: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 17, 2–7. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jsams.​2013.​03.​011.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1976). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey CA: Brooks-Cole. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1976). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey CA: Brooks-Cole.
go back to reference Theimer, C. E., Killen, M., & Stangor, C. (2001). Young children’s evaluations of exclusion in gender-stereotypic peer contexts. Developmental Psychology, 37, 18–27.CrossRefPubMed Theimer, C. E., Killen, M., & Stangor, C. (2001). Young children’s evaluations of exclusion in gender-stereotypic peer contexts. Developmental Psychology, 37, 18–27.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Trach, J., Hymel, S., Waterhouse, T., & Neale, K. (2010). Bystander responses to school bullying: A cross-sectional investigation of grade and sex differences. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25, 114–130. doi:10.1177/0829573509357553.CrossRef Trach, J., Hymel, S., Waterhouse, T., & Neale, K. (2010). Bystander responses to school bullying: A cross-sectional investigation of grade and sex differences. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25, 114–130. doi:10.​1177/​0829573509357553​.CrossRef
go back to reference Turner, J. C. (1978). Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. In H. Tajfel (Ed.). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press. Turner, J. C. (1978). Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. In H. Tajfel (Ed.). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
go back to reference van Hoorn, J., Fuligni, A. J., Crone, E. A., & Galván, A. (2016a). Peer influence effects on risk-taking and prosocial decision-making in adolescence: Insights from neuroimaging studies. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 59–64. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.05.007.CrossRef van Hoorn, J., Fuligni, A. J., Crone, E. A., & Galván, A. (2016a). Peer influence effects on risk-taking and prosocial decision-making in adolescence: Insights from neuroimaging studies. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 59–64. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cobeha.​2016.​05.​007.CrossRef
go back to reference van Hoorn, J., van Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C., & Crone, E. A. (2016b). Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 90–100. doi:10.1111/jora.12173.CrossRef van Hoorn, J., van Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C., & Crone, E. A. (2016b). Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 90–100. doi:10.​1111/​jora.​12173.CrossRef
go back to reference Zosuls, K. M., Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., Miller, C. F., Gaertner, B. M., England, D. E., & Hill, A. P. (2011). ‘It’s not that we hate you’: Understanding children’s gender attitudes and expectancies about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 288–304. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2010.02023.x.CrossRefPubMed Zosuls, K. M., Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., Miller, C. F., Gaertner, B. M., England, D. E., & Hill, A. P. (2011). ‘It’s not that we hate you’: Understanding children’s gender attitudes and expectancies about peer relationships. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 288–304. doi:10.​1111/​j.​2044-835X.​2010.​02023.​x.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Children’s and Adolescents’ Expectations about Challenging Unfair Group Norms
Auteurs
Kelly Lynn Mulvey
Melanie Killen
Publicatiedatum
07-04-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0671-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2017

Journal of Youth and Adolescence 10/2017 Naar de uitgave