Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Prior research has suggested that disadvantaged neighborhood contexts alter the etiology of youth antisocial behavior (ASB). Unfortunately, these studies have relied exclusively on governmental data collected in administratively-defined neighborhoods (e.g., Census tracts or block groups, zip codes), a less than optimal approach for studying neighborhood effects. It would thus be important to extend prior findings of GxE using neighborhood sampling techniques, in which disadvantage is assessed via resident informant-reports of the neighborhood. The current study sought to do just this, examining two independent twin samples from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. Neighborhood disadvantage was assessed via maternal and neighbor informant-reports, the latter of which were analyzed multiple ways (i.e., all neighbors within 1 km, nearest neighbor, and all neighbors within the County). Analyses revealed clear and consistent evidence of moderation by neighborhood disadvantage, regardless of informant or the specific operationalization of neighborhood. Shared environmental influences on ASB were observed to be several-fold larger in disadvantaged contexts, while genetic influences were proportionally more influential in advantaged neighborhoods. Such findings indicate that neighborhood disadvantage exerts rather profound effects on the origins of youth ASB. Efforts should now be made to identify the active ingredients of neighborhood disadvantage.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA School-age Forms & Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. CrossRef
Amone-P'Olak, K., Burger, H., Huisman, M., Oldehinkel, A. J., & Ormel, J. (2011). Parental psychopathology and socioeconomic position predict adolescent offspring's mental health independently and do not interact: the TRAILS study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65(1), 57–63. CrossRef
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885–908. CrossRef
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. CrossRef
Burt, S. A. (2009b). Rethinking environmental contributions to child and adolescent psychopathology: a meta-analysis of shared environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 608–637. CrossRef
Burt, S. A., Klump, K. L., Gorman-Smith, D., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2016). Neighborhood disadvantage alters the origins of children’s non-aggressive conduct problems. Clinical Psychological Science.
Chambers, T., Pearson, A., Kawachi, I., Rzotkiewicz, Z., Stanley, J., Smith, M., et al. (2017). Kids in space: measuring children's residential neighborhoods and other destinations using activity space GPS and wearable camera data. Social Science & Medicine, 193, 41–50. CrossRef
Cleveland, H. H. (2003). Disadvantaged neighborhoods and adolescent aggression: behavioral genetic evidence of contextual effects. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 211–238. CrossRef
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences: Routledge.
Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J. E., & Su, M. (2002). Measuring neighborhood context for young children in an urban area. In Ecological research to promote social change (pp. 99–126). Springer.
Duncan, D. T., Kawachi, I., Subramanian, S., Aldstadt, J., Melly, S. J., & Williams, D. R. (2013). Examination of how neighborhood definition influences measurements of youths' access to tobacco retailers: a methodological note on spatial misclassification. American Journal of Epidemiology, 179(3), 373–381. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Ellis, B. J., & Boyce, W. T. (2008). Biological sensitivity to context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 183–187. CrossRef
Foster, K. A., & Hipp, J. A. (2011). Defining neighborhood boundaries for social measurement: advancing social work research. Social Work Research, 35(1), 25–35. CrossRef
Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., & Hariri, A. R. (2013). Neuroscience, developmental psychopathology and youth antisocial behavior: review, integration, and directions for research. Developmental Review, 33, 168–223. CrossRef
Knezevic, A. (2008). Overlapping confidence intervals and statistical significance: Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit, http://www.cscu.cornell.edu/news/statnews/stnews73.pdf.
Kwan, M.-P. (2012). The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5), 958–968. CrossRef
Lewontin, R. (1995). Human diversity. New York: Scientific American Library.
Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossRef
Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical Modeling. VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry, 6th Edition.
Open_Science_Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. CrossRef
Pennington, B. F., McGrath, L. M., Rosenberg, J., Barnard, H., Smith, S. D., Willcutt, E. G., Friend, A., DeFries, J. C., & Olson, R. K. (2009). Gene X environment interactions in reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Developmental Psychology, 45, 77–89. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Pluess, M. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 138–143. CrossRef
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. CrossRef
Sclove, L. S. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 53(3), 333–343. CrossRef
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & Van Der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 64(4), 583–639. CrossRef
Spielman, S. E., & Yoo, E.-H. (2009). The spatial dimensions of neighborhood effects. Social Science & Medicine, 68(6), 1098–1105. CrossRef
Spielman, S. E., Yoo, E.-H., & Linkletter, C. (2013). Neighborhood contexts, health, and behavior: understanding the role of scale and residential sorting. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(3), 489–506. CrossRef
Tackett, J. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Johnson, S. L., Krueger, R. F., Miller, J. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Shrout, P. E. (2017). It’s time to broaden the replicability conversation: thoughts for and from clinical psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 742–756. PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
- Child Antisocial Behavior Is more Environmental in Origin in Disadvantaged Neighborhoods: Evidence Across Residents’ Perceptions and Geographic Scales in Two Samples
S. Alexandra Burt
Amber L. Pearson
Kelly L. Klump
Jenae M. Neiderhiser
- Springer US
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
An official publication of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Print ISSN: 0091-0627
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2835