Skip to main content
main-content

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

23-05-2018 | Original Article | Uitgave 3/2018 Open Access

Perspectives on Medical Education 3/2018

Characterizing the literature on validity and assessment in medical education: a bibliometric study

Tijdschrift:
Perspectives on Medical Education > Uitgave 3/2018
Auteurs:
Meredith Young, Christina St-Onge, Jing Xiao, Elise Vachon Lachiver, Nazi Torabi
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40037-018-0433-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Introduction

Assessment in Medical Education fills many roles and is under constant scrutiny. Assessments must be of good quality, and supported by validity evidence. Given the high-stakes consequences of assessment, and the many audiences within medical education (e. g., training level, specialty-specific), we set out to document the breadth, scope, and characteristics of the literature reporting on validation of assessments within medical education.

Method

Searches in Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, ERIC, EMBASE (Ovid), and PsycINFO (Ovid) identified articles reporting on assessment of learners in medical education published since 1999. Included articles were coded for geographic origin, journal, journal category, targeted assessment, and authors. A map of collaborations between prolific authors was generated.

Results

A total of 2,863 articles were included. The majority of articles were from the United States, with Canada producing the most articles per medical school. Most articles were published in journals with medical categorizations (73.1% of articles), but Medical Education was the most represented journal (7.4% of articles). Articles reported on a variety of assessment tools and approaches, and 89 prolific authors were identified, with a total of 228 collaborative links.

Discussion

Literature reporting on validation of assessments in medical education is heterogeneous. Literature is produced by a broad array of authors and collaborative networks, reported to a broad audience, and is primarily generated in North American and European contexts. Our findings speak to the heterogeneity of the medical education literature on assessment validation, and suggest that this heterogeneity may stem, at least in part, from differences in constructs measured, assessment purposes, or conceptualizations of validity.
Extra materiaal
ESM-Appendix 1 Search strategy and Appendix 2 Authors with five or more publications included in the study (author in first, last, or sole author position)
40037_2018_433_MOESM1_ESM.docx
ESM-Figure 1 Number of publications reporting validation of assessment across time
40037_2018_433_MOESM2_ESM.jpg
ESM-Table 1 Journals with 15 or more published articles included in the study
40037_2018_433_MOESM3_ESM.docx
ESM-Table 2 List of categories representing at least 1% of total publications, and the number of journals associated with each category
40037_2018_433_MOESM4_ESM.docx
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2018

Perspectives on Medical Education 3/2018Naar de uitgave