Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Measuring utility for cost-utility analysis (CUA) is challenging in children. The objectives were to characterize pediatric CUAs, appraise their quality, and identify determinants of higher quality.
Descriptive data were imported from the PEDE database for 305 pediatric CUAs published from 1997 to 2009, and quality was rated using the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ) in 213 studies. The impact on quality of publication year, journal type, and whether utility was measured was analyzed using multiple regression.
CUAs increased over time and the largest proportion was from North America (38%). Children aged 1–12 years (39%) and preventative interventions (51%) were studied most frequently. Whereas a societal perspective was most common in papers published before 2007 (49%), a third-party payer perspective was subsequently most frequent (63%). Utility was measured prospectively in 8% of studies. Domains that demonstrated the poorest quality were Perspective, Costs and resource use, Outcomes, Analysis, Incremental analysis and Conflict of interest. Quality increased significantly over time for most domains and was greater in studies published in methods/health economic journals.
The quality of pediatric CUAs is increasing. Few studies ascertain utility prospectively, suggesting the need for better instruments for pediatric health state valuation and measurement.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. (2006). Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada. The Canadian agency for drugs and technologies in health. http://www.cadth.ca/media/pdf/186_EconomicGuidelines_e.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2010.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. (2010). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. National Health Service. http://www.nice.org.uk/. Accessed 5 April 2010.
Drummond, M., Sculpher, M., Torrance, G., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, B. J. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Office of Health Economics, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers’ Associations. Trends in economic evaluation. The Health Economic Evaluations Database (OHE HEED). (2004). London. OHE-IFPMA. OHE Briefing: England.
Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2004). Trends in pediatric health economic evaluation: 1980 to 1999. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89, 26–29. PubMed
Ungar, W. J., & Gerber, A. (2010). The uniqueness of child health and challenges to measuring costs and consequences. In W. J. Ungar (Ed.), Economic evaluation in child health (pp. 1–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sung, L., Petrou, S., & Ungar, W. J. (2010). Measurement of health utilities in children. In W. J. Ungar (Ed.), Economic evaluation in child health (pp. 77–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prosser, L. A., Hammitt, J. K., & Keren, R. (2007). Measuring health preferences for use in cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses of interventions in children: theoretical and methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics, 25, 697–702. CrossRef
Tarride, J. E., Burke, N., Bischof, M., Hopkins, R. B., Goeree, L., Campbell, K., et al. (2010). A review of health utilities across conditions common in pediatric and adult populations. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 1–11. CrossRef
The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208. CrossRef
Wang, Q., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G., & Barr, R. (2002). How robust is the health utilities index mark 2 utility function? Medical Decision Making, 22, 350–358. PubMed
Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technology Assessment, 5, 1–157. PubMed
Dickie, M., & Gerking, S. (2006). Valuing children’s health: parental perspectives. In economic valuation of environmental health risks to children (pp. 121–158). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (1997). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation. Toronto’s hospital for sick children, http://pede.ccb.sickkids.ca/pede/index.jsp. Accessed on 12 Jul 2009.
World Health Organization. (2007). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision version for 2007. World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/. Accessed on 10 May 2009.
Ungar, W. J., & Santos, M. T. (2005). Quality appraisal of pediatric health economic evaluations. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 21, 203–210. PubMed
Cairns, J. A. (2006). Discounting of children’s health: conceptual and practical difficulties. In economic valuation of environmental health risks to children (pp. 187–206). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Varni, J., Burwinkle, T., & Lane, M. (2005). Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3, 1–9. CrossRef
- Characteristics and quality of pediatric cost-utility analyses
Seija K. Kromm
Sarah A. Edwards
Peter C. Coyte
Wendy J. Ungar
- Springer Netherlands