Skip to main content
  • 445 Accesses

Abstract

The framework of institutional corruption provides a method for an investigation of an institution to proceed step by step. First, identify the institution’s public mission, that is, its obligation to serve the public good. Next, identify the “economies of influence” that are present and may corrupt the institution. Then document the institution’s “corrupt” behaviors. At that point, seek to understand the harm done to society by the corruption. This step, which can be quite difficult, provides a moment to pause and reflect, for the harm done may go beyond what is immediately visible, and instead reach deep into our collective lives.

Institutional corruption, which is usually built into the routines and practices of organizations, is usually more damaging to the institution and society than individual corruption, which in advanced societies typically consists of isolated acts of misconduct with effects limited in time and scope.

—Dennis F. Thompson, 20131

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. D. Thompson. “Two concepts of corruption.” Edmond J. Safra Working Papers, No. 16, August 1, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Beauchamp. “Informed consent: its history, meaning, and present challenges.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2011): 515–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Silverman. The Epidemiology of Depression (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1968): 139.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Kessler. “Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003.” NEJM 352 (2005): 2515–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. New Zealand Ministry of Social Development. “National Benefits Factsheets,” 2004–11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Thorlacus. “Increased incidence of disability due to mental and behavioural disorders in Iceland, 1990–2007.” J Ment Health 19 (2010): 176–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Offidani. “Excessive mood elevation and behavioral activation with antidepressant treatment of juvenile depressive and anxiety disorders.” Psychother Psychosom 82 (2013): 132–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Faedda. “Pediatric bipolar disorder.” Bipolar Disorders 6 (2004): 305–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Satcher, Report of Surgeon General’s Conference on Children’s Mental Health (U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Blader. “Increased rates of bipolar disorder diagnoses among U.S. child, adolescent, and adult inpatients, 1996–2004.” Biol Psychiatry 62 (2007): 107–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Government Accountability Office. “Young adults with serious mental illness: Some states and federal agencies are taking steps to address their transition challenges” (June 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Z. Hurston. Dust Tracks on a Road: An Autobiography. (New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2006): 227.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Pescosolido. “A disease like any other? A decade of change in public reactions to schizophrenia, depression, and alcohol dependence.” Am J Psychiatry 167 (2010): 1321–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Harrow. “Factors involved in outcome and recovery in schizophrenia patients not on antipsychotic medications.” J Nerv Ment Disease 195 (2007): 406–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Harrow. “Do all schizophrenia patients need antipsychotic treatment continuously throughout their lifetime? A 20-year longitudinal study.” Psychol Med 42 (2012): 2145–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Ho. “Long-term antipsychotic treatment and brain volumes.” Arch Gen Psychiatry 68 (2011): 128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Radua. Also see B. Ho. “Progressive structural brain abnormalities and their relationship to clinical outcome.” Arch Gen Psychiatry 60 (2003): 585–94. N. Andreasen. “Longitudinal changes in neurocognition during the first decade of schizophrenia illness.” International Congress on Schizophrenia Research (2005): 348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Robert Whitaker and Lisa Cosgrove

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitaker, R., Cosgrove, L. (2015). A Society Harmed. In: Psychiatry Under the Influence. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137516022_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics