Skip to main content

Psychiatry Adopts a Disease Model

  • Chapter
Psychiatry Under the Influence
  • 461 Accesses

Abstract

The modern era of psychiatry, in terms of its classification of mental disorders, dates to 1980, when the American Psychiatric Association (APA) published the third edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III). This marked the moment that the APA moved away from psychoanalytic explanations for mental disorders and adopted what it considered to be a more scientific way to think about psychiatric difficulties. The disorders were to be diagnosed based on characteristic “symptoms,” a model that other medical specialties, when faced with illnesses of unknown causes, had long used. The public was encouraged to think of mental disorders as “diseases,” and very soon, with this concept in mind and the arrival of new psychiatric medications on the market, the use of these drugs soared. In the United States, spending on psychiatric drugs increased from around $800 million in 1985 to more than $40 billion in 2011, evidence of how the diagnosis of mental disorders and the prescribing of psychiatric medications have dramatically expanded since the publication of DSM-III.2

The struggle over the drafting and publication of the DSM-III appeared to be a clinical debate, but underlying it all was a vehement political struggle for professional status and direction.

—Rick Mayes, 20051

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Mayes. “DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness.” J Hist Behav Sci 41 (2005): 249–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IMS Health. “Top Therapeutic Classes by U.S. Spending,” 2007–2011. Spending on antipsychotics, antidepressants, and ADHD medications in the U.S. totaled $37.1 billion; spending on “anti-epileptics” for treatment of mood disorders is estimated to have comprised at least $3 billion of the $5.9 billion spent on this class of drugs in 2011, bringing the total spending in 2011 to above $40 billion.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Grob. “Origins of DSM-I: a study in appearance and reality.” Am J Psychiatry 148 (1991): 421–31. In this article, Grob provides a detailed review of the history of psychiatry nosology that led up to the APA’s creation of DSM-I; we have relied on his account for this brief description of psychiatry’s nosology prior to DSM-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nancy Tomes, The Art of Asylum Keeping (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994): 124.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Decker. The Making of DSM-III (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013): 4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Wilson. “DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: a history.” Am J Psychiatry 150 (1993): 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Beck. “Reliability of psychiatric diagnoses.” Am J Psychiatry 119 (1962): 351–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Spitzer. “A re-analysis of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis.” Br J Psychiatry 125 (1974): 341–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Rosenhan. “On being sane in insane places.” Science 179 (1973): 250–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Kendler. “The development of the Feigner criteria: a historical perspective.” Am J Psychiatry 167 (2010): 134–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Strand. “Where do classifications come from? The DSM-III, the transformation of American psychiatry, and the problem of origins in the sociology of knowledge.” Theor Soc 40 (2011): 273–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Maciver. “Patterns of psychiatric practice.” Am J Psychiatry 115 (1959): 692–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Szasz. The Myth of Mental Illness, rev. edition (New York: Harper and Row, 1974; first edition 1960): xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Buchanan. “Legislative warriors: American psychiatrists, psychologists, and competing claims over psychotherapy in the 1950s.” J Hist Behav Sci 39 (2003): 225–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Mayes. “DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness.” J Hist Behav Sci 41 (2005): 249–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Hackett. “The psychiatrist: in the mainstream, or on the banks of medicine.” Am J Psychiatry 134 (1977): 432–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Sabshin. “On remedicalization and holism in psychiatry.” Psychosomatics 18 (1977): 7–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S Kety. “From rationalization to reason.” Am J Psychiatry 131 (1974): 957–63.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Ludwig. “The medical basis of psychiatry.” Am J Psychiatry 134 (1977): 1087–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Guze. “Nature of psychiatric illness: why psychiatry is a branch of medicine.” Comp Psychiatry 19 (1978): 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Redlich. “Trends in American mental health.” Am J Psychiatry 135 (1978): 22–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Spitzer. “Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability.” Arch Gen Psychiatry 35 (1978): 773–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Dean. “Diagnosis: the Achilles’ heel of biological psychiatry.” Minnesota Medicine 74 (1991): 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Adler. “The medical model and psychiatry’s tasks.” Hosp Community Psychiatry 32 (1981): 387–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Robert Whitaker and Lisa Cosgrove

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitaker, R., Cosgrove, L. (2015). Psychiatry Adopts a Disease Model. In: Psychiatry Under the Influence. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137516022_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics