Abstract
In 2005, a public hearing was held on ECT—part of an event called “Inquiry into Psychiatry.” Numerous survivors bore testimony. Explicitly addressing memory, Wendy testified, “I returned home to a family I had no memory of … My social work career had vanished” (Inquiry into Psychiatry, 2005, Electroshock, tape 1). In a different vein, articulating what became of her vibrancy and sense of connection, Paivi stated, “The deep emotions … that … were part of my life … had disappeared. It is as looking through a window, watching the activity going on inside, trying to be a part of that but never really being able to connect—and I have felt like that ever since” (Electroshock, Tape 2). By contrast, focusing on the in-hospital experience, Chris testified:
I was exposed to the usual propaganda … that ECT is now safe and effective. I was shown a short video in the hospital. The video … showed the person … being shocked … The video did not show the person awakening in the recovery room alone and disoriented. (Electroshock, Tape 2)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2015 Bonnie Burstow
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burstow, B. (2015). Electroshock: Not a “Healing” Option. In: Psychiatry and the Business of Madness. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503855_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503855_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50384-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50385-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)