Skip to main content

Abstract

How should we imagine critical thinking? Briefly searching the Internet reveals a large number of activities and classroom concepts that treat critical thinking as a skill. Many of the best activities and approaches start with the classroom and the material of the course, developing the critical thinking skill set that should transfer to the activity of daily life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle. 1984. On Rhetoric. Vol. 2, The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branham, R. J. 1991. Debate and Critical Analysis: The Harmony of Conflict. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. 1968. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. 1998. Writing without Teachers. (second edition). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, T. 1995. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. W., and Hicks, D. 2005. “Lost Convictions.” Cultural Studies 19 (1): 100–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, M. 2005. “Turning Water into Wine.” College Teaching 53 (3): 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. 2010. Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. R. 2012. “Information Infrastructure as Rhetoric: Tools for Analysis.” Poroi: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis & Invention 8 (1): 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, M. 2006. “Up from Theory: Or I Fought the Topoi and the Topoi Won.” RSQ: Rhetoric Society Quarterly 36 (2): 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G. R. 2000. “Simulated Public Argument as a Pedagogical Play on Worlds.” Argumentation & Advocacy 36 (3): 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. L. 1967. “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic.” Central States Speech Journal 18 (February): 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. 1998. The Argument Culture: Stopping America’s War of Words. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitson, S., and Poulakos, J. 1993. “Nietzsche and the Aesthetics of Rhetoric.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 79 (2): 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Martin Davies Ronald Barnett

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Llano, S.M. (2015). Debate’s Relationship to Critical Thinking. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics