Skip to main content

Abstract

My argument is that criticality can be distinguished through two axes: first, its levels, ranging from narrow operational skills to transformatory critique, and second, its scope, consisting of the three domains of formal knowledge, the self, and the world. In summary, my schema takes the form shown in table 3.1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bauman, Z. 1991. Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1994. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, S. 1995. Conflict and Consensus in Higher Education. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. 1982. Decline of Donnish Dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, A. S. 1945. The University and the Modern World. London: SCM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. 1971. The Degradation of the Academic Dogma. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. 1995. The Meanings of Mass Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotto, E. 1994. When Teaching Becomes Learning: A Theory and Practice of Teaching. Trowbridge: Redwood books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. 1984. “To Civilise Our Gentlemen.” In A Reader. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, L. 1996. “The Holocaust and Liberal Education.” In The University in a Liberal State, edited by B. Brecher, O. Fleischmann, and J. Halliday. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Martin Davies Ronald Barnett

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barnett, R. (2015). A Curriculum for Critical Being. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics