Abstract
Critical thinking and argumentation are closely allied. And yet each field has its own derivation and antecedents, and the differences between these are fundamental not only to debates today about their centrality in higher education, but to the entire history of the relationship (in Europe at least) between thought and language as well. On the one hand, critical thinking is most closely allied to philosophy; on the other, argumentation is allied with rhetoric. The debate about the relationship between philosophy and rhetoric goes back to Plato and Aristotle. It concerns ideas, ideals, concepts, and abstract thought and logic in relation to philosophy and the expression of these categories in verbal and other forms of language. Both critical thinking and argumentation overlap in their territories of engagement, and both have pedagogical implications for learning and teaching in higher education. This chapter explores the relationship, examines some examples at doctoral level (and briefly at undergraduate level), and puts the case for argumentation as the best focus in terms of taking forward practice in higher education. In doing so, it may run counter to the arguments in many of the chapters in this book, but the challenge presented in this chapter may act like the grit in the oyster. In Toulminian terms, the challenge can be rebutted or lead to a more qualified position on the role of critical thinking in higher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andrews, R. 2002. “Argumentation in Education: Issues Arising from Undergraduate Students’ Work.” In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, edited by F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, and F. S. Henkemans. Amsterdam: SicSat (International Center for the Study of Argumentation). 17–22.
Andrews, R. 2005. “Models of Argumentation in Educational Discourse.” Text 25 (1): 107–127.
Andrews, R. 2007. “Argumentation, Critical Thinking and the Postgraduate Dissertation.” Educational Review 59 (1): 1–18.
Andrews, R. 2009a. Argumentation in Higher Education: Improving Practice through Theory and Research. New York: Routledge.
Andrews, R. 2009b. “A Case Study of Argumentation in Undergraduate Level History.” Argumentation 23 (4): 547–558.
Andrews, R. 2014. A Theory of Contemporary Rhetoric. New York: Routledge.
Andrews, R., Borg, E., Boyd Davis, S., Domingo, M., and England, J. 2012. The Sage Handbook of Digital Dissertations and Theses. London: Sage.
Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Low, G., McGuinn, N., and Robinson, A. 2006a. Improving Argumentative Skills in Undergraduates: A Systematic Review. New York: Higher Education Academy.
Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Robinson, A., See, B. H., Mitchell, S., Peake, K., Prior, P., and Bilbro, R. 2006b. Argumentative Skills in First Year Undergraduates: A Pilot Study. New York: Higher Education Academy.
Ennis, R. H. 1987. A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, edited by J. B. Baron and R. J. Sternberg. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. 9–26.
Kaufer, D., and Geisler, C. 1991. “ A Scheme for Representing Academic Argument.” The Journal of Advanced Composition 11 (Winter): 107–122.
Kuhn, D. 2005. Education for Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lipman, M. 2003. Thinking in Education. (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, C. 1984. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.
Milson, A.-M. 2008. Picturing Voices, Writing Thickness: A Multimodal Approach to Translating the Afro-Cuban Tales of Lydia Cabrera. unpublished PhD dissertation, Middlesex University, London.
Milsom, A.-M. 2012. Translating Lydia Cabrera: A Case Study in Digital (Re)Presentation. In The Sage Handbook of Digital Dissertations and Theses, edited by R. Andrews, E. Borg, S. Boyd Davis, M. Domingo, and J. England. London: Sage. 276–297.
Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliott, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., and Newton, D. P. 2005. Frameworks for Thinking: A Handbook for Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paul, R. W. 1987. Dialogical Thinking: Critical Thought Essential to the Acquisition of Rational Knowledge and Passions. In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, edited by J. B. Baron and R. J. Sternberg. New York: W. H. Freeman. 127–148.
Sterne, L. 1759–67. The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. London: Ann Ward (vol. 1–2), Dodsley (vol. 3–4), Becket & DeHondt (5–9).
Toulmin, S. E. 1958. The Uses of Argument. (first edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walton, D. 2008. Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yoshimi, J. 2004. “Mapping the Structure of Debate.” Informal Logic 24 (1): 1–21.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrews, R. (2015). Critical Thinking and/or Argumentation in Higher Education. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47812-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37805-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)