Abstract
When the benefits of tertiary education are listed, the development of critical thinking is often near the top of the list (Bok 2006). The critical thinker can, among other things, assess evidence, judge the relevance of new information to existing beliefs, and break down a complex problem into less complex parts and work through them in an orderly way. Abilities like these are useful in myriad contexts beyond the classroom. It is easy to see why critical thinking is seized upon as an important part of higher education’s contribution to transforming students into lifelong learners.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aberdein, A. 2010. “Virtue in Argument.” Argumentation 24: 165–179.
Behar-Horenstein, L., and Niu, L. 2011. “Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of College Teaching and Learning 8 (2): 25–41.
Bok, D. 2006. Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bowell, T., and Kemp, G. 2014. Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide. (third fourth edition). London/New York: Routledge.
Code, L. 1984. “Towards a ‘Responsibilist’ Epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45: 29–50.
Cohen, D. 2009. “Keeping an Open Mind and Having a Sense of Proportion as Virtues in Argumentation.” Cogency 1 (2): 49–64.
Ennis, R. 1994. “Critical Thinking Dispostions: Their Nature and Assessability.” Informal Logic 18 (2): 165–182.
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Garner, R. 1990. “When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Settings.” Review of Educational Research 60 (4): 517–529.
Goldberg, I., Kingsbury, J., and Bowell, T. 2014. Measuring Critical Thinking about Deeply Held Beliefs. In Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for Argumentation, edited by Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewinski. Windsor, ON: OSSA.
Lepock, C. 2011. “Unifying the Intellectual Virtues.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83: 106–128.
Paul, R. 2000. “Critical Thinking, Moral Integrity, and Citizenship: Teaching for the Intellectual Virtues.” In Knowledge, Belief and Character, edited by G. Axtell. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Salmon, M. 2012. Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking. (sixth edition). Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.
Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tishman, S., Jay, E. and Perkins, D. 1993. “Teaching Thinking Dispositions: From Transmission to Enculturation.” Theory into Practice 32 (3): 147–153.
Waller, B. 2011. Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict (sixth edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Zagzebski, L. T. 1996. Virtues of the Mind : An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bowell, T., Kingsbury, J. (2015). Virtue and Inquiry: Bridging the Transfer Gap. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47812-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37805-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)