Skip to main content

Abstract

When the benefits of tertiary education are listed, the development of critical thinking is often near the top of the list (Bok 2006). The critical thinker can, among other things, assess evidence, judge the relevance of new information to existing beliefs, and break down a complex problem into less complex parts and work through them in an orderly way. Abilities like these are useful in myriad contexts beyond the classroom. It is easy to see why critical thinking is seized upon as an important part of higher education’s contribution to transforming students into lifelong learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aberdein, A. 2010. “Virtue in Argument.” Argumentation 24: 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behar-Horenstein, L., and Niu, L. 2011. “Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of College Teaching and Learning 8 (2): 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. 2006. Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowell, T., and Kemp, G. 2014. Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide. (third fourth edition). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. 1984. “Towards a ‘Responsibilist’ Epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45: 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. 2009. “Keeping an Open Mind and Having a Sense of Proportion as Virtues in Argumentation.” Cogency 1 (2): 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. 1994. “Critical Thinking Dispostions: Their Nature and Assessability.” Informal Logic 18 (2): 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. 1990. “When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Settings.” Review of Educational Research 60 (4): 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, I., Kingsbury, J., and Bowell, T. 2014. Measuring Critical Thinking about Deeply Held Beliefs. In Virtues of Argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for Argumentation, edited by Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewinski. Windsor, ON: OSSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepock, C. 2011. “Unifying the Intellectual Virtues.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83: 106–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. 2000. “Critical Thinking, Moral Integrity, and Citizenship: Teaching for the Intellectual Virtues.” In Knowledge, Belief and Character, edited by G. Axtell. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, M. 2012. Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking. (sixth edition). Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tishman, S., Jay, E. and Perkins, D. 1993. “Teaching Thinking Dispositions: From Transmission to Enculturation.” Theory into Practice 32 (3): 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, B. 2011. Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict (sixth edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, L. T. 1996. Virtues of the Mind : An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Martin Davies Ronald Barnett

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowell, T., Kingsbury, J. (2015). Virtue and Inquiry: Bridging the Transfer Gap. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics