Abstract
Critical thinking appears in university curricula, course outlines, and statements of graduate attributes, and yet there is both uncertainty about what it entails and passionate debate about its essential nature. This chapter argues that while there are common elements of critical thinking, it is, in its practice and teaching, a disciplined act. Critical thinking occurs within the conventions, methodologies, and knowledge bases of particular disciplines and fields and within the structures that they provide. Thus it is disciplined in both its subject specificity and its orderliness. This is not to suggest that critical thinking cannot interrogate the subject area in which it resides, or that it cannot transcend disciplinary boundaries. Rather, it is to suggest that one needs to learn to think critically in an organized manner, that this can be done by following a particular intellectual tradition or discipline, and that critical thinking needs to have some content. As Smith (1992) points out, knowledge is central to critical thinking and one cannot think critically unless one has knowledge of the topic. For McPeck (1981), critical thinking is shaped by the “particular problem under consideration” (7). In other words, we think critically about something.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, P. A., and Judy, J. E. 1988. “The Interaction of Domain-Specific and Strategic Knowledge in Academic Performance.” Review of Educational Research 58: 375–404.
Barnett, R. 1997. Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.
Baron, J., and Sternberg, R. 1987. Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Brookfield, S. 1987. Developing Critical Thinkers: Challenging Adults to Exlore Alternative Ways of Thinking and Acting. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Donald, J. G. 2002. Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Donald, J. G. 2009. “The Commons: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Encounters.” In The University and Its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning within and beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, edited by Carolin Kreber. New York and London: Routledge. 35–49.
Ennis, R. H. 1987. “A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities.” In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, edited by J. Baron and R. Sternberg. New York: Freeman.
Ennis, R. H. 1992. “The Degree to Which Critical Thinking Is Subject Specific: Clarification and Needed Research.” In The Generalizability of Critical Thinking, edited by S. Norris. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ennis, R. H. 1996. Critical Thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Facione, P. A. 2000. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. California Academic Press, 1997 1996 [16/11/00 2000]. Available from http://www.calpress.com/critical. html.
Facione, P. A. 1990. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction “the Delphi Report.” Millbrae, CA: American Philosophical Association, The California Academic Press.
Halpern, D. 1996. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. (third edition) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hounsell, D., and Anderson, C. 2009. “Ways of Thinking and Practicing in Biology and History: Disciplinary Aspects of Teaching and Learning Environments.” In The University and Its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning within and beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, edited by Carolin Kreber. New York and London: Routledge. 71–83.
Jones, A. 2004. “Teaching Critical Thinking: An Investigation of a Task in Introductory Macroeconomics.” Higher Education Research and Development 23 (2): 167–181.
Jones, A. 2005. “Culture and Context: Critical Thinking and Student Learning in Introductory Macroeconomics.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (3): 339–354.
Jones, A. 2006. Re-Disciplining Generic Skills: An Examination of the Relationship between the Disciplinary Context and Generic Skills in Higher Education, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne, unpublished PhD thesis.
Jones, A. 2007. “Multiplicities or Manna from Heaven? Critical Thinking and the Disciplinary Context.” Australian Journal of Education 5 (1): 84–103.
Jones, A. 2009. “Re-Disciplining Generic Attributes: The Disciplinary Context in Focus.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (1): 85–100.
Kalman, C. S. 2002. “Developing Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Courses: A Philosophical Approach.” Science and Education 11: 83–94.
Kreber, C. 2009. “Supporting Student Learning in the Context of Diversity, Complexity and Uncertainty.” In The University and Its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning within and beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, edited by Carolin Kreber. New York and London: Routledge. 3–18.
Kurfiss, J. 1988. Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice and Possibilities. Washington, DC: ASHE-Eric Higher Education Report No. 2, Associate for the Study of Higher Education.
McPeck, J. 1981. Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. 1994. “Data Management and Analysis Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nickerson, R. S., Perkins, D. N., and Smith, E. E. 1985. The Teaching of Thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Norris, S., and Ennis, R. H. 1990. Evaluating Critical Thinking. Edited by R. J. Swartz and D. N. Perkins. Cheltenham, VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education.
Norris, S. P. 1992. The Generalizability of Critical Thinking: Multiple Perspectives on an Educational Ideal. New York: Teachers College Press.
Paul, R. 1989. “Critical Thinking in North America: A New Theory of Knowledge, Learning and Literacy.” Argumentation 3: 197–235.
Perkins, D. N., and Salomon, G. 1994. “Transfer of Learning.” In The International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by T. Husen and T. N. Postlethwaite (second edition). Oxford: Pergamon, 11.
Robinson, S. R. 2011. “Teaching Logic and Teaching Critical Thinking: Revisiting McPeck.” Higher Education Research and Development 30 (3): 275–287.
Rowland, S. 2006. The Enquiring University: Compliance and Contestation in Higher Education. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press McGraw-Hill Education.
Silverman, D. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research. (second edition). London: Sage.
Smith, F. 1992. To Think: In Language, Learning and Education. London: Routledge.
Verlinden, J. 2005. Critical Thinking and Everyday Argument. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, A. (2015). A Disciplined Approach to Critical Thinking. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47812-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37805-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)