Abstract
People seem to believe some pretty strange things; at least they say things that suggest that they do. Among the more dramatic of these are the various monothematic delusions which have recently been the focus of much philosophical discussion:1 Patients suffering, for example, from the Capgras syndrome claim that a loved one, typically a spouse or parent, has been replaced by an impostor; patients suffering from the Cotard syndrome claim that they are dead. Monothematic delusions are of interest to philosophers of mind, not because of any particular clinical interest, but because it is deeply puzzling just how to take these patients’ claims: Do these patients really believe what they claim, or are their claims to be understood in other ways, perhaps metaphorically or perhaps as the expression of a propositional attitude other than belief? What makes it difficult to credit these patients’ claims as expressions of belief is not simply their unbelievable, sometimes even pragmatically self-defeating contents. How, for example, could anyone believe that they are literally dead? It is also that these claims are typically not accompanied by the behavioral, cognitive, and affective responses that we expect of someone who genuinely believes what these claims suggest. Most Capgras patients, for example, don’t take action to find their missing loved one, (e.g. reporting their absence to the police); most seem curiously unconcerned as to the fates of these missing loved ones.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bauman, C., and Sitka, L. 2006, “Ethnic Group Differences in Lay Philosophies of Behavior in the United States”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 37: 438–45.
Bem, D. 1992, “On the Uncommon Wisdom of Our Lay Personality Theory”, Psychological Inquiry 3: 82–4.
Bayne, T., and Fernandez, J. 2009, “Delusion and Self-deception: Mapping the Terrain”, in Bayne, T. and Fernandez, J. (eds), Delusion and Self-Deception: Motivational and Affective Influences on Belief-Formation, 1–22.
—. (eds) 2009, Delusion and Self-Deception: Motivational and Affective Influences on Belief-Formation, New York: Psychology Press.
Bayne, T., and Pacherie, E. 2005, “In Defence of the Doxastic Conception of Delusions”, Mind & Language 20, 163–88.
Callaghan, T., Rochat, P., Lillard, A., Claux, M., Odden, H., Itakura, S., Tapanya, S., and Singh, S. 2005, “Synchrony in the Onset of Mental-state Reasoning”, Psychological Science 16, 378–84.
Coltheart, M., Langdon, R., and McKay, R. 2011, “Delusional Belief”, Annual Review of Psychology 62, 271–98.
Currie, G. 2000, “Imagination, Delusion and Hallucinations”, Mind & Language 15, 168–83.
Currie, G. and Jureidini, J. 2001, “Delusion, Rationality, Empathy: Commentary on Martin Davies et al.”, Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology 8, 159–62.
Currie, G., and Ravenscroft, I. 2002, Recreative Minds, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, M., and Coltheart, M. 2000, Pathologies of Belief, Mind & Language 15, 1–46.
DSM-IV-TR. 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR (Fourth Edition), Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Egan, A. 2009, “Imagination, Delusion, and Self-deception”, in Bayne, T. and Fernandez, J. (2009), 281–89.
Fodor, J. 1987, Psychosemantics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gendler, T. 2008. “Alief and belief”. Journal of Philosophy 105, 634–63.
Lillard, A. 1998, “Ethnopsychologies: Cultural Variations in Theories of Mind”, Psychological Bulletin 123, 3–32.
Matthews, R. 2007. The Measure of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—. 2011, “How to Be a Dispositionalist about the Attitudes”, plenary address presented to SPE4, Bochum, October.
Needham, R. 1973, Belief, Language, and Experience, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pacherie, E. 2009, “Perception, Emotions and Delusions: Revisiting the Capgras’ Delusion”, in Bayne T. and Fernandez, J. (eds), (2009), 107–38.
Pettit, P. 1998, “Practical Belief and Philosophical Theory”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76:15–33.
Pylyshyn, Z. 1984, Computation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ryle, G. 1949, The Concept of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sabbagh, M., Xu, F., Carlson, S., Moses, L., and Lee, K. 2006, “The Development of Executive Functioning and Theory of Mind”, Psychological Science 17, 74–81.
Schwitzgebel, E. 2002, “A Phenomenal Dispositional Account of Belief”, Nous 36, 249–75.
Sterelny, K. 1990, The Representational Theory of Mind, Oxford: Blackwell.
Vinden, P. 1996, “Junín Quechua Children’s Understanding of Mind”, Child Development 67, 1707–16.
Vinden, P. 1999, “Children’s Understanding of Mind and Emotion: A Multi-culture Study”, Cognition and Emotion 13, 29–48.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Robert J. Matthews
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matthews, R.J. (2013). Belief and Belief’s Penumbra. In: Nottelmann, N. (eds) New Essays on Belief. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026521_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137026521_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43922-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-02652-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)