Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Decline and Fall of the Classical Conception

  • Chapter
The Rediscovery of Wisdom

  • 68 Accesses

Abstract

From classical antiquity until well after the dawn of modernity, the classical conception of philosophy enjoyed wide currency, if not hegemony. Not only was it well known throughout this period, it was more or less openly espoused by practically all the major philosophers. From the fifth century CE onwards, however, the conception acquired a largely Christian inflection. Just how dominant the conception was during this period may be seen from the following brief survey of philosophy from the Greeks up to modernity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Epictetus, Moral Discourses, trans. E. Carter (London: Dent, 1966), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. H. Armstrong (ed.), Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1970), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Porphyry, ‘Life of Plotinus’ quoted in Armstrong, Cambridge History, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Plotinus, Enneads, trans. S. MacKenna (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1991), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  9. St Augustine, Concerning the City of God against the Pagans, trans. H. Bettenson (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972), p. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., pp. 375–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 414.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 430.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy, trans. V. E. Watts (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1969), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., pp. 35–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., pp. 97–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Maimonides, Guide of the Perplexed, trans. S. Pines (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1963), vol. 2, pp. 620–1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., pp. 624–38 passim.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Aquinas, ‘Debated Questions’, VIII, q 9, a.19,c, quoted in An Aquinas Reader, ed. M. T. Clark (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1972), p. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Aquinas, ‘Prologue to the Commentary on the Causes’, quoted in Clark, An Aquinas Reader, pp. 82–3.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See B. P. Copenhaver and C. B. Schmitt, Renaissance Philosophy (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Hamlyn, The Penguin History of Philosophy (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987), p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  24. O. Kristeller, Renaissance Thought (New York: Harper & Row, 1965), p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Ficino, from Preface to Platonic Theology in Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts, ed. J. Kraye, vol. 1, Moral Philosophy (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 148–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., pp. 149–51.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Erasmus, The Praise ofFolly, trans. John Wilson (New York: Prometheus Books, 1994), pp. 178–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., pp. 185–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Descartes, Principles of Philosophy, in Philosophical Works of Descartes, trans. E. S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press), vol. 1, pp. 202–8 passim.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Letter to Chanut, Letter CDLXVIII, 1 Feb. 1647, in Descartes: His Moral Philosophy and Psychology, trans. J. J. Blom (Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester, 1978), p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., pp. 206–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. B. Spinoza to I. Orobio, Letter XLIV, 1671, in Chief Works of Spinoza, [trans.] R. H. M. Elwes (New York: Dover, 1955), vol. II, p. 365.

    Google Scholar 

  33. B. Spinoza, Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, in Chief Works, vol. II, pp. 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  34. G. W. Leibniz, ‘Principles of Nature and Grace, Founded on Reason’ (1714) in G.W. Leibniz, Philosophical Writings, ed. G. H. R. Parkinson (London and Melbourne: Everyman, 1973), pp. 202–4 passim.

    Google Scholar 

  35. B. Whichcote, ‘The Use of Reason in Matters of Religion’ in CambridgePlatonists, ed. C. A. Patrides (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969), p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid., p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ibid., p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  39. I. Newton, Mathematical Principles ofNatural Philosophy, vol. ii, The System of the World, trans. A. Motte (1729) revised F. Cajori (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1962), pp. 544–6 passim.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Anthony Ashley Cooper, Earl of Shaftesbury, The Moralists in Characteristics ofMen, Manners, Opinions and Times (originally published 1711), ed. J. M. Robertson (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964), pp. 97–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. F. Hutcheson, Illustrations on the Moral Sense in An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections with Illustrations on the Moral Sense, first published 1728 (Mentors Yorkshire: Scolar Press, 1972), p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1976), p. 385.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., pp. 385–6.

    Google Scholar 

  44. D. Hume, ‘The Epicurean’, in Of the Standard of Taste and Other Essays (Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  45. D. Hume, ‘The Platonist’ in Of the Standard of Taste and Other Essays, pp. 115–18 passim.

    Google Scholar 

  46. E. C. Mossner, The Life of David Hume, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reported in the editorial introduction of R. Wollheim, Hume on Religion (London and Glasgow: Collins, 1963), p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  48. David Hume to Gilbert of Minto (10 March 1751), quoted in a footnote in T. H. Huxley, Hume (Macmillan: London, 1879), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  49. L. Kolakowski, Positivist Philosophy (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  50. I. Kant, Lectures on Ethics, trans. L. Infield (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1963), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ibid., p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ibid., p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  53. I. Kant, Critique ofPure Reason, trans. N. Kemp Smith (London: Macmillan, 1929), Bxxxiv.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid., Bxxx.

    Google Scholar 

  56. G. Rabel, Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963), p. vi.

    Google Scholar 

  57. For a convincing objection to Kant’s argument here, see A. W. Wood, Kant’s Rational Theology (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1978), p. 24. Wood observes (p. 24), ‘In the same way as Kant acknowledged morality can coincide with self-interest, and that when they do, we should be moved by moral considerations, so even if we knew good acts would be rewarded we could still be motivated to perform them from moral reasons.’

    Google Scholar 

  58. Quoted ibid., p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Quoted in W. Wallace, Kant (Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood and Sons, 1905), p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  60. A. Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation, trans. E. F. J. Payne (New York: Dover, 1958), vol. 1, p. 510.

    Google Scholar 

  61. A. Schopenhauer, ‘Fragments for the History of Philosophy’ in Parerga and Paralipomena, vol. 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974), p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  62. D. Hume, Dialogues ConcerningNatural Religion (1779) in Hume on Religion, ed. R. Wollheim (London and Glasgow: Fontana, 1963), pp. 161–2.

    Google Scholar 

  63. D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978), Book 1, Part III, sec. III, pp. 79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  64. J. Haldane, ‘Atheism and Theism’ in J. J. Smart and J. J. Haldane, Atheism andTheism (Oxford and Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1996), p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Hume, Dialogues, p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ibid., pp. 162–3.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Haldane, ‘Atheism and Theism’, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  68. J. Sadowsky, ‘The Cosmological Argument and the Endless Regress’, International Philosophical Quarterly, 20 (1980), 465. Quoted in Davies, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion, p. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  69. J. Haldane, ‘Atheism and Theism’ in J. J. C. Smart and J. J. Haldane, Atheism and Theism (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 155–6.

    Google Scholar 

  70. See, for example, W. W. Fletcher, Modern Man Looks at Evolution (Redhill: Fontana, 1974), esp. pp. 77–8.

    Google Scholar 

  71. R. Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker (Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical, 1986), pp. 5–6 passim. These passages by Dawkins are quoted in J. A. Sadowsky, ‘Did Darwin Destroy the Design Argument?’, International Philosophical Quarterly, XXVIII (1988), 95–104, p. 95. The present author is deeply indebted to this article.

    Google Scholar 

  72. For this argument, I am deeply indebted to the work of Richard Swinburne. See, especially, R. Swinburne, Is There a God? (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  73. F. Nietzsche, Gay Science, trans. W. Kauffmann (New York: Vintage Books, 1974), aph. 359, p. 315.

    Google Scholar 

  74. F. Nietzsche, Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality, trans. R. J. Hollingdale (Cambridge, New York and Melbourne, Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1982), aph. 42, pp. 42–3.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ibid., aph. 43, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  76. F. Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols in F. Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols and The Anti-Christ, trans. R. J. Hollingdale (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ibid., pp. 106–7.

    Google Scholar 

  78. F. Nietzsche, Ecce Homo, trans. R. J. Hollingdale (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979), pp. 96–7.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ibid., pp. 133–4.

    Google Scholar 

  80. R. Schacht, Nietzsche (London, Boston, Melbourne and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ibid., p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ibid., p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Middlesex University, UK

    David Conway (Professor of Philosophy)

Authors
  1. David Conway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2000 David Conway

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conway, D. (2000). The Decline and Fall of the Classical Conception. In: The Rediscovery of Wisdom. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597129_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation