Skip to main content

Theory-based Validity in Action

  • Chapter
Language Testing and Validation

Part of the book series: Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics ((RPAL))

  • 979 Accesses

Abstract

In Part 1 we argued that approximation to the construct in a measurement instrument is essentially the result of the interactions between its context and theory-based elements. In Chapter 6 we looked at the elements of the validity framework that need to be considered under context validity. We now turn to the theory-based elements. In our present state of knowledge it is easier to treat context- and theory-based aspects of validity separately for descriptive purposes but we recognize that it is the interaction between them and the scoring criteria that lies at the heart of construct validity; see Chapter 11, Case studies 1–3 for ways we might start to address these relationships. Establishing the nature of these interactions is what will take forward our understanding of language testing and the constructs it attempts to measure (see Chaloub Deville 2003 for a programmatic discussion of the ‘abilities-in language users-in contexts’ participant metaphor perspective).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

Speaking

  • Bygate (1987) is an early, but still useful, view of the speaking process, focusing on procedural aspects as against the componential approach adopted by many other writers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt (1993) is one of the few researchers to address the process of speaking compared to the decidedly a-modal mindset of other applied linguists preoccupied with the written mode.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes (2002) sets the record straight about the importance of researching speaking in its own right with its own grammar and its own theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher (2003) addresses the need to include empirical and theoretical analyses of response processes as part of developing a validity argument for a test.

    Google Scholar 

Reading

  • Alderson (2000) provides a comprehensive account of reading research and theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe and Stoller (2002) offer a comprehensive and readable account of reading theory, research and practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart and Weir (1998) provide further detail on the conceptualization of reading adopted in this chapter. A thoughtful, if occasionally irreverent, overview of practice, process and product in reading.

    Google Scholar 

Listening

  • Rost (2002) provides an excellent overview of teaching and researching listening and provides a thorough treatment of the linguistic and pragmatic processes involved in listening.

    Google Scholar 

Writing

  • Hyland (2002) offers a wide review of writing research and teaching.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Cyril J. Weir

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weir, C.J. (2005). Theory-based Validity in Action. In: Language Testing and Validation. Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514577_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics