Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adapting to Western Norms of Critical Argumentation and Debate

  • Chapter
Researching Chinese Learners

Abstract

The number of Chinese students coming to the UK to undertake postgraduate courses has been steadily growing over the past decades and comprises a large proportion of the international students at master’s level in the UK. Given their importance to the income and culture of UK universities, it is important to research the difficulties and challenges many students encounter in adapting to Western-style critical argumentation and debate. Critical debate is a defining concept in Western universities, and is rooted in the Socratic/Aristotelian pursuit and discovery of ‘truth’ through the disciplined process of critical thinking. Critical-thinking theorists, such as Paul (1993), Ennis (1996) and Siegel (1988), advocate this type of thinking as the highest form of reasoning for all human beings, though critics argue that this is an ethnocentric view, and that different cultures employ and value different styles of reasoning (Gee, 1994; Street, 1994).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, R. (2007) Argumentation, critical thinking and the postgraduate dissertation, Educational Review, 59(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailin, S. (1995) Is critical thinking biased? Clarifications and implications. Educational Theory, 45(2), 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. and trans. Carl Emerson. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1997) Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. B., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R. & Tarule, J. R. (1986) Women’s Ways of Knowing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1973) The Relevance of Education. New York: Vintage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprioni, P. & Arias, M. E. (1997) Managerial skills training from a critical perspective, Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 292–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. L. (1990) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria, Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David-Neel, A. (1979) Buddhism, its Doctrines and its Methods. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daymon, C. & Holloway, I. (2002) Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doi, T. (1981) The Anatomy of Dependence. New York: Kodansha International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P. & Mullen, M. R. (1998) Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust, The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. & Martin, J. (2007) Confucian philosophy for teaching twenty first values in Australian schools, International Journal of Humanities, 7(5), 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1996) Critical Thinking. London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A., Sanchez, C. A., Facione, N. C. & Gainen, J. (1995) The disposition toward critical thinking, Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, G. & Ting-Toomey, S. (1998) Communicating Effectively with the Chinese, vol. 5 of Communicating Effectively in Multicultural Contexts. Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1994) From ‘the savage mind’ to ‘ways with words’. In J. Maybin (ed.) Language and Literacy in Social Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters and The Open University, pp. 168–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, D. H. (1978) Balance the Basics: Let them Write. New York: Ford Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1976) Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Turner, C. & Trompenaars, F. (2000) Building Cross-Cultural Competence. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hird, B. (1999) English for academic purposes: cultural impediments to academic objectivity, Prospect, 14(1), 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. & Bond, M. H. (1984) Hofstede’s culture dimensions: an independent validation using Rokeach’s value survey, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, C. (1951) Buddhism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, J. (2001) Narrowing the concept of marketing. In M. T. Ewing (ed.) Social Marketing. New York: Best Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (1993) Cultural orientation and academic language use. In D. Graddol, L. Thompson & M. Byram (eds) Language and Culture. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (1998) The culture the learner brings: a bridge or a barrier? In M. Byram & M. Fleming (eds) Language Learning in Intercultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Tae-Seop (2002) Language and verbal communication across cultures. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (eds) Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, Y. (1988) Re-examination of the universality of face: politeness phenomena in Japanese, Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2000) What is it to be critical? Teaching a critical approach to management undergraduates, Management Learning, 31(2), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Andrea (1990) Words of Power: A Feminist Reading of the History of Logic. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, Deborah (1989) Just the facts ma’am: informal logic, gender and pedagogy, Informal Logic, 11(1), Winter, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. (1993) Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World (3rd edn). Robert Park, CA: The Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) (2007) Subject Benchmark Statements: Master’s Degrees in Business Management. QAA 158 02/07. Section 3:10. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/statements/BusinessManagementMasters.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, Marlene & Bereiter, Carl (1994) Development of dialectical processes in composition. In B. Stierer & J. Maybin (eds) Language, Literacy and Learning in Educational Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters and The Open University, pp. 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, R. (1995) Students as customers: a mangled managerial metaphor. Paper presented at the Carolinas Speech Communication Association Convention, October, Charlotte, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (1988) Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking and Education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. V. (1994) Cross cultural perspectives on literacy. In J. Maybin (ed.) Language and Literacy in Social Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters and The Open University, pp. 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990) You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1998) The Argument Culture. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarnas, R. (1991) The Passion of the Western Mind. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B. (1992) Is modern critical thinking sexist?, Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, September, 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B. (1993) Caring and its relationship to critical thinking, Educational Theory, 43(3), Summer, 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. (1999) Communicating Across Cultures. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting-Toomey, S. & Kurogi, A. (1998) Facework competence in intercultural conflict: an updated face-negotiation theory, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22, 187–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995) Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, Fons (1993) Riding the Waves of Culture. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1994) Extracts from ‘Thought and Language’ and ‘Mind and Society’. In B. Stierer & J. Maybin (eds) Language, Literacy and Learning in Educational Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters and The Open University, pp. 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkner, P. & Finney, N. (1999) Skill development and critical thinking in higher education, Teaching in Higher Education, 4(4), 531–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, K. (2002) Understanding Identity. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Z. (2000) An Introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kathy Durkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. De Montfort University, UK

    Lixian Jin (Reader in Linguistics and Health Communication) (Reader in Linguistics and Health Communication)

  2. University of Warwick, UK

    Martin Cortazzi (Visiting Professor) (Visiting Professor)

Copyright information

© 2011 Kathy Durkin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Durkin, K. (2011). Adapting to Western Norms of Critical Argumentation and Debate. In: Jin, L., Cortazzi, M. (eds) Researching Chinese Learners. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299481_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation