Skip to main content

The Utility of Coping When Considering Resilience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Coping and the Challenge of Resilience
  • 2159 Accesses

Abstract

In popular vernacular, resilience has acquired a meaning that is much like buoyancy, and the concept of ‘bounce back’ is frequently incorporated into the numerous definitions. It is applied to the economy, the community, and the individuals. Whilst well-validated approaches to measurement are yet to be developed, there is a greater clarity on how we assess individual resilience rather than collective or communal resilience. Assessment post-event can be an indicator of a resilient outcome whilst coping provides evidence of the process that leads to resilience. Moreover, coping has established predictive power for health and well-being (see series of studies in Chap. 5).

How do you eat an elephant – one bite at a time. (Robyn, musician)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, it should be noted that in recent years Shelley Taylor has challenged this theorising, saying that whilst it is true that in situations of extreme stress both males and females ‘fight or flee’, in situations which are not extreme females are more inclined to look after their young and join with their friends. She termed this ‘tend and befriend’ (Taylor, 2010).

References

  • Aldwin, C. (2010). Stress and coping across the lifespan. In The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 15–34). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195375343.013.0002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, L. G. (2005). The psychology of future-oriented thinking: From achievement to proactive coping, adaptation, and aging. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 203–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R., & Thomas-Knowles, C. (1991). Emotional creativity. In K. T. Strongman (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (Vol. 1, pp. 269–299). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Exline, J. J. (2000). Self-control, morality, and human strength. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1984). Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 877–891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. B. (1989). Wisdom of the body (Special ed.). Birmingham, AL: Classics of Medicine Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1994). All emotions are basic. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 15–19). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. (1997). Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Social Science & Medicine, 45(8), 1207–1221, 1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. (2008). The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 21(1), 3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. (2010). Stress, coping, and hope. Psycho-Oncology, 19(9), 901–908. doi:10.1002/pon.1836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S. (2011). The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). The relationship between coping and emotion: Implications for theory and research. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 26(3), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Stress, positive emotion, and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(4), 115–118. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., Moskowitz, J. T., Ozer, E. M., & Park, C. L. (1997). Positive meaningful events and coping in the context of HIV/AIDS. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Coping with chronic stress (pp. 293–314). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The Broaden-and-Build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1367–1377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S., & Safran, J. D. (1987). Emotion in psychotherapy: Affect, cognition, and the process of change. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenglass, E., & Schwarzer, R. (1998). The Proactive Coping Inventory (PCI). In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Advances in health psychology research (CD-ROM). Berlin, Germany: Free University of Berlin. Institut for Arbeits, Organizations-und Gesundheitspsychologie. (IBN 3-00-002776-9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress culture and community: The psychology and philosophy of stress. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2010). Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockenbury, D. H., & Hockenbury, S. E. (2001). Discovering psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11(2), 213–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1993). Organizational and motivational functions of discrete emotions. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 631–641). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In L. C. MacLean & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making. Part I, World scientific handbook in financial economics series (Vol. 4, pp. 99–127). Hackensack, NJ/Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality, and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaption. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55(3), 234–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. The American Psychologist, 55(6), 665–673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., Kanner, A., & Folkman, S. (1980). Emotions: A cognitive phenomenological analysis. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion-Theory research and experience: Vol. I. Theories of emotion. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. J. (1991). Human change processes: The scientific foundations of psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, J. T., Shmueli-Blumberg, D., Acree, M., & Folkman, S. (2012). Positive affect in the midst of distress: Implications for role functioning. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 22(6), 502–518. doi:10.1002/casp.1133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19(1), 2–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (2012). Resilience as a dynamic concept. Development and Psychopathology, 24(2), 335–344. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saarni, C. (1997). Emotional competence and self-regulation in childhood. In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 35–66). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saklofske, D. H., Austin, E. J., Mastoras, S. M., Beaton, L., & Osborne, S. E. (2012). Relationships of personality, affect, emotional intelligence and coping with student stress and academic success: Different patterns of association for stress and success. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 251–257. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185–211 .doi: 0.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG.

  • Schumm, J. A., Briggs-Phillips, M., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2006). Cumulative interpersonal traumas and social support as risk and resiliency factors in predicting PTSD and depression among inner-city women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(6), 825–836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Parks, A. C., & Steen, T. (2004). A balanced psychology and a full life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1379–1381.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1976). Stress in health and disease. Boston, MA: Butterworths, c1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanan, J., De-Nour, A. K., & Garty, I. (1976). Effects of prolonged stress on coping style in terminal renal failure patients. Journal of Human Stress, 2(4), 19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A. (1991). The self, appraisal, and coping. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook for social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 116–137). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (2010). Health handbook of social psychology. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 25–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weigold, I. K., & Robitschek, C. (2011). Agentic personality characteristics and coping: Their relation to trait anxiety in college students. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81(2), 255–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. D., Hobfoll, S. E., & Lavin, J. (1999). When it rains, pours: The greater impact of resource loss compared to gain on psychological distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9), 1172–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21(2), 152–169, 118p. doi:10.1017/S0959259810000420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamani, G. H., Gorgievski-Duijvesteijn, M. J., & Zarafshani, K. (2006). Coping with drought: Towards a multilevel understanding based on conservation of resources theory. Human Ecology, 34, 677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frydenberg, E. (2017). The Utility of Coping When Considering Resilience. In: Coping and the Challenge of Resilience. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56924-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics