Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stigmatic Representation of Intellectual Disability and Termination of Parental Custody Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intellectual Disability and Stigma

Abstract

This chapter will argue that the long-standing stigma toward people with intellectual disabilities which underpinned eugenic ideologies in the early twentieth century continues to influence contemporary practice and attitudes and is very much evident in child protection work. Despite the existence of a number of international human rights treaties intended to safeguard the right of people with disabilities to form relationships and have and raise children, these rights continue to remain under threat. We contend that the regulatory focus has shifted from directly governing the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities to governing one of the potential outcomes of sexuality—children—specifically in the area of child protection and child custody proceedings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aunos, M., & Feldman, M. (2008). There’s no place like home: The child’s right to family. In T. O’Neill & D. Zinga (Eds.), Children’s rights: Multidisciplinary approaches to participation and protection (pp. 137–162). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. J. (2010). Constructing normalcy. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (5th ed., pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekema, D. S. (2003). Involuntary sterilization of persons with mental retardation: An ethical analysis. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 9(1), 21–26. doi:10.1002/mrdd.10053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, E., & Brigham, P. (2014). The developmental health of children of parents with intellectual disabilities: Cross sectional study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 917–921. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. A. (1994). Parenting education for parents with intellectual disabilities: A review of outcome studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15(4), 299–332. doi:10.1016/0891-4222(94)90009-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S., & Dodd, K. (2014). ‘Normal people can have a child but disability can’t’: The experiences of mothers with mild learning disabilities who have had their children removed. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 25–35. doi:10.1111/bld.12006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, G., Traustadóttir, R., McConnell, D., & Sigurjónsdóttir, H. B. (2010). Conclusion: Taking stock and looking to the future. In L. G. Llewellyn, R. Traustadóttir, D. McConnell, & H. B. Sigurjónsdóttir (Eds.), Parents with intellectual disabilities: past, present and futures (pp. 241–262). London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsdóttir, U. (1998). Mannkynbætur: Hugmyndir um bætta kynstofna hérlendis og erlendis á 19. og 20. öld. [Eugenic ideas in Iceland and other countries in the 19th and 20th century]. Reykjavík, Iceland: University of Iceland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D., & Llewellyn, G. (2002). Stereotypes, parents with intellectual disability and child protection. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 24(3), 297–317. doi:10.1080/09649060210161294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D., & Llewellyn, G. (2000). Disability and discrimination in statutory child protection proceedings. Disability & Society, 15, 883–895. doi:10.1080/713662015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., & Snyder, S. (2003). The eugenic Atlantic: Race, disability, and the making of an international eugenic science, 1800–1945. Disability and Society, 18, 843–864. doi:10.1080/096875903200012728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Disability (2012). Rocking the cradle: Ensuring the rights of parents with disabilities and their children. Washington, DC: NCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. M., Solomon, P., & Mandell, D. S. (2006). Involvement in the child welfare system among mothers with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 57, 493–497. doi:10.1176/ps.2006.57.4.493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M. (2003). Disability: A life course approach. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. G. (2010). Questions of disempowerment in disability specific entitlements in Iceland. In O. Ólafs & H. Proppé (Eds.), Rannsóknir í félagsvísindum XI [Research in Social Sciences XI] (pp. 99–105). Reykjavík, Iceland: Social Science Research Institute and the University of Iceland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Series, L. (2015). Mental capacity and the control of sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities in England and Wales. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), Disability research today: International perspectives (pp. 149–165). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M. (2012). Alcohol and intellectual disability: Personal problem or cultural exclusion? Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 16(3), 183–192. doi:10.1177/1744629512455595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M. K. (2011). Othering intellectual disability: Two models of classification from the 19th century. Theory and Psychology, 22(5), 541–555. doi:10.1177/0959354310378375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slayter, E. M. (2010). Disparities in access to substance abuse treatment among people with intellectual disabilities and serious mental illness. Health and Social Work, 35(1), 49–59. doi:10.1093/hsw/35.1.49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stefánsdóttir, G. V. (2014). Sterilisation and women with intellectual disability in Iceland. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 39(2), 188–197. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.899327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefánsdóttir, G. V., & Traustadóttir, R. (2015). Life histories as counter-narratives against dominant and negative stereotypes about people with intellectual disabilities. Disability and Society, 30, 368–380. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1024827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubblefield, A. (2007). “Beyond the pale”: Tainted whiteness, cognitive disability, and eugenic sterilization. Hypatia, 22(2), 162–181. doi:10.1111/j.15272001.2007.tb009-87.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, L., McLaughlin, D., Quinn, B., & McFarlane, C. (2007). Listening to people with intellectual disabilities who misuse alcohol and drugs. Health and Social Care in the Community, 15, 360–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tøssebro, J., Bonfils, I. S., Teittinen, A., Tideman, M., Traustadóttir, R., & Vesala, H. T. (2012). Normalization fifty years beyond—Current trends in the Nordic Countries. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(2), 134–146. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2012.00340.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tymchuk, A. J., & Andron, L. (1990). Mothers with mental retardation who do or do not abuse or neglect their children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 14, 313–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, C., Llewellyn, G., & Matthews, J. (2008). Review of parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21, 351–366. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00449.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfensberger, W. (1980). A brief overview of the principle of normalization. In R. J. Flynn & K. E. Nitsch (Eds.), Normalization, social integration and community service (pp. 7–30). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2014). Eliminating forced, coercive and otherwise involuntary sterilization: An interagency statement. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112848/1/9789241507325_eng.pdf

Legislation

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Disability Studies, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland

    Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir & James G. Rice

Authors
  1. Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James G. Rice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom

    Katrina Scior

  2. Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Shirli Werner

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sigurjónsdóttir, H.B., Rice, J.G. (2016). Stigmatic Representation of Intellectual Disability and Termination of Parental Custody Rights. In: Scior, K., Werner, S. (eds) Intellectual Disability and Stigma. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52499-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation