Abstract
A key goal of feminists in psychology has been to understand and challenge social relations of inequality, privilege, and oppression. Several orienting assumptions of mainstream psychology present obstacles to achieving this goal. For example, one assumption is internalism—focusing on inner motives, traits, and capacities as the determinants of human behaviour, while ignoring the sociocultural context. Another is universalism—the assumption that psychological theories and explanations can hold for all people everywhere and at all times. The chapter also reviews the history of feminism in psychology and provides an overview of methods and practices utilized by feminist psychologists.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1: Theory and method. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Aronson, E. (1972). The social animal. San Francisco: Freeman.
Becker, D. (2014). One nation under stress: The trouble with stress as an idea. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Becker, D., & Marecek, J. (2008). Dreaming the American dream: Positive psychology and individualism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1767–1780.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18.
Bishop, R. C. (2007). The philosophy of the social sciences. London: Continuum.
Bohan, J. (Ed.). (1992). Seldom seen, rarely heard: Women’s place in psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Bowleg, L. (this volume).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
Christopher, J. C., Wendt, D., Marecek, J., & Goodman, D. (2014). Critical cultural awareness: Contributions to a globalizing psychology. American Psychologist, 69, 646–655.
Crawford, M., & Marecek, J. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female: 1968–1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147–165.
Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Dobson, A. S. (2014). Performative shamelessness on young women’s social network sites: Shielding the self and resisting gender melancholia. Feminism & Psychology, 24, 97–114.
Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas, and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189–228). London: Sage.
Fleck, L. (1935/1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fox-Genovese, E. (1991). Feminism without illusions: A critique of individualism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
Freud, S. (1926/1959). The question of lay analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 20, p. 212). London: Hogarth.
Gavey, N. (1992). Technologies and effects of heterosexual coercion. Feminism & Psychology, 2, 325–351.
Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape. London: Routledge.
Haavind, H. (1973). Myten om den gode mor [The Myth of the Good Mother]. In H. Haavind (Ed.), Myten om den gode mor [The Myth of the Good Mother] (pp. 35–98). Oslo, Norway: Pax Publishers.
Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1986). Autonomy and gender: Some questions for therapists. Psychotherapy: Theory, Practice, and Research, 23, 205–212.
Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist, 43, 455–464.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 65–83.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1916). Sex differences in mental traits. Psychological Bulletin, 12, 377–384.
Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative, and the interview method. London: Sage.
Hornstein, G., & Star, S. (1990). Universality biases: How theories about human nature succeed. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 20, 421–436.
Jayawardena, K. (1986). Feminism and nationalism in the Third World. London: Zed.
Jellison, K. (1987). History in the courtroom: The Sears case in perspective. The Public Historian, 9, 9–19.
Kitzinger, C. (Ed.). (1994). Should psychologists study sex differences? [Special Feature]. Feminism & Psychology, 4, 501–546.
Kitzinger, C. (2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 163–193.
Kravetz, D., Marecek, J., & Finn, S. E. (1983). Factors influencing women’s participation in consciousness-raising groups. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 7, 257–271.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
Magnusson, E. (2005). Gendering or equality in the lives of Nordic heterosexual couples with children: No well-paved avenues yet. Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 13, 153–163.
Magnusson, E. (2011). Women, men and all the other categories: Psychologies for theorizing human diversity. Nordic Psychology, 63, 88–114.
Magnusson, E., & Marecek, J. (2012). Gender and culture in psychology: Theories and practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Magnusson, E., & Marecek, J. (2015). Doing interview-based qualitative research: A learner’s guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Marecek, J. (1995). Gender, politics, and psychology’s ways of knowing. American Psychologist, 50, 162–163.
Melbin, A., Sullivan, C. M., & Cain, D. (2003). Transitional supportive housing programs: Battered women’s perspectives and recommendations. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 18, 445–460.
Mill, J. S. (1869/1929). The subjection of women. London: Everyman’s Library.
Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
Miller, P. H., & Scholnick, E. K. (2015). Feminist theory and contemporary developmental psychology: The case of children’s executive function. Feminism & Psychology, 25, 266–283.
Morawski, J., & Bayer, B. (2013). Social psychology. In D. Freedheim & I. Weiner (Eds.), The history of psychology (2nd ed., pp. 248–278). New York: Wiley.
Parlee, M. B. (1982). Changes in moods and activation levels during the menstrual cycle in experimentally naive subjects. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 7, 119–131.
Radtke, H. L. (2009). Theorizing mothering in the context of intimate partner violence. In T. Teo, P. Stenner, & A. Rutherford (Eds.), Varieties of theoretical psychology: ISTP 2007. Concord, Ontario, Canada: Captus Press.
Ray, R. (1999). Fields of protest: Women’s movements in India. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Ray, R. (2012). Handbook of gender. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
Riger, S. (1988). Comment on “Women’s history goes to trial: EEOC v. Sears, Roebuck and Company”. Signs, 13, 897–903.
Riley, S. (this volume).
Rutherford, A., Capdevila, R., Undurti, V., & Palmary, I. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of international feminisms. New York: Springer.
Rutherford, A., Marecek, J., & Sheese, K. (2012). The psychology of women and gender. In D. Freedheim (Ed.), The history of psychology (2nd ed., pp. 241–268). New York: Wiley.
Sampson, E. E. (1977). Psychology and the American ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 767–782.
Sampson, E. E. (1993). Celebrating the other: A dialogic account of human nature. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Segal, L. (1996). Freud and feminism: A century of contradiction [Introduction to Special Feature]. Feminism & Psychology, 6, 290–297.
Sherif, C. W. (1978/1992). Bias in psychology. In J. Bohan (Ed.), Seldom seen, rarely heard: Women’s place in psychology (pp. 107–146). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Shields, S. A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. American Psychologist, 30, 739–754.
Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59, 301–331.
Spence, J., & Helmreich, R. (1978). Masculinity and femininity. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Stewart, A., & McDermott, C. (2004). Gender in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 519–544.
Thompson Woolley, H. (1910). Psychological literature. A review of the recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 335–342.
Torre, M. E., Fine, M., & Fox, M. (2012). Critical participatory action research as public science. In H. Cooper et al. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychology, and biological (pp. 171–184). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Unger, R. K. (Ed.). (2004). Handbook of the psychology of women and gender. New York: Wiley.
Warner, L., & Shields, S. A. (2013). The intersections of sexuality, gender, and race: Identity research at the crossroads. Sex Roles, 68, 803–810.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Weisstein, N. (1968/1993). Psychology constructs the female; or the fantasy life of the male psychologist (with some attention to the fantasies of his friends the male biologist and the male anthropologist). Feminism & Psychology, 3, 194–210.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.
Wilkinson, S. (Ed.). (1986). Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Wilkinson, S. (1988). The role of reflexivity in feminist psychology. Women’s Studies International Forum, 11, 493–502.
Wilkinson, S. (Ed.). (1996). Feminist social psychologies: International perspectives. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Wilkinson, S. (1997). Prioritizing the political: Feminist psychology. In T. Ibañez & L. Íñiguez (Eds.), Critical social psychology (pp. 178–194). London: Sage.
Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 177–199). London: Sage.
Wilson, R. (2004). Boundaries of the mind: The individual in the fragile sciences: Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1792/1996). A vindication of the rights of woman. Mineola, NY: Dover Thrift Editions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magnusson, E., Marecek, J. (2017). Feminisms, Psychologies, and the Study of Social Life. In: Gough, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51017-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51018-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)