Abstract
In temporal reproduction, participants produce a motor response which is intended to reflect the duration of a previously presented stimulus or event. There are various ways of doing this. In early research by Vierordt (1868), for example, two taps were made on a glass plate, with some interval between them, and the participant made a single tap such that the time between the second tap on the plate and the participant’s response was the same as the time between the two taps. This may sound like a rather crude method, but in fact it is in principle very similar to the “ready-set-go” procedure used in more recent research (Jazayeri & Shadlen, 2010). The interval to be reproduced is the time between a “Ready” and “Set” cue, and the participant must then respond once such that the time between the “Set” and the response is the same as that between the two previously presented cues. In Jazayeri and Shadlen’s experiment, feedback was provided as to reproduction accuracy. If the interval reproduced was within some time window around the target, a green signal was then presented, although in many reproduction experiments, no feedback is given with regard to performance accuracy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allan, L. G., & Gibbon, J. (1991). Human bisection at the geometric mean. Learning and Motivation, 22, 39–58.
Boltz, M. G. (1994). Changes in internal tempo and effects on the learning and remembering of event durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1154–1171.
Bovet, P. (1968). Echelles subjectives de durée obtenues par une méthode de bissection. L’Année Psychologique, 68, 23–36.
Catania, A. C. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and psychophysical judgments. In W. N. Schoenfeld (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules (pp. 1–42). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Church, R. M., & Deluty, M. Z. (1977). Bisection of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 216–228.
Church, R. M., & Gibbon, J. (1982). Temporal generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 165–186.
Craik, F. I. M., & Hay, J. F. (1999). Aging and judgments of duration: Effects of task complexity and method of estimation. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 549–560.
Droit-Volet, S. (2010). Stop using time reproduction tasks in a comparative perspective without further analyses of the role of the motor response on the temporal performance: The case of children. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 130–148.
Droit-Volet, S., & Wearden, J. H. (2001). Temporal bisection in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 142–159.
Franssen, V., & Vandierendonck, A. (2002). Time estimation: Does the reference memory mediate the effect of knowledge of results? Acta Psychologica, 109, 239–267.
Hellstrom, A. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive comparing. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 35–61.
Jazayeri, M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2010). Temporal context calibrates interval timing. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 1021–1028.
Lejeune, H., & Wearden, J. H. (2009). Vierordt’s “The experimental study of the time sense” (1868) and its legacy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 941–960.
Malapani, C., Deweer, B., & Gibbon, J. (2002). Separating storage from retrieval dysfunction of temporal memory in Parkinson ’s disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 311–322.
Fraisse, P. (1967). Psychologie du temps. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rakitin, B. C., Gibbon, J., Penney, T. B., Malapani, C., Hinton, S. C., & Meck, W. H. (1998). Scalar expectancy theory and peak-interval timing in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 15–33.
Rammsayer, T. G., & Brandler, S. (2007). Performance on temporal information processing as an index of general intelligence. Intelligence, 35, 123–139.
Roberts, S. (1981). Isolation of an internal clock. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 242–268.
Ryan, L. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Erroneous knowledge of results affects decision and memory processes on timing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1468–1482.
Vierordt, K. (1868). Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen. Tubingen: Laupp.
Wackerman, J., & Ehm, W. (2006). The dual klepsydra model of time representation and time reproduction. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 239, 482–493.
Wearden, J. H. (1991b). Human performance on an analogue of an interval bisection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 59–81.
Wearden, J. H. (1992). Temporal generalization in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 134–144.
Wearden, J. H. (2003). Applying the scalar timing model to human time psychology: Progress and challenges. In H. Helfrich (Ed.), Time and mind II: Information-processing perspectives (pp. 21–39). Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
Wearden, J. H., & Bray, S. (2001). Scalar timing without reference memory: Episodic temporal generalization and bisection in humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 289–310.
Wearden, J. H., & Farrar, R. (2007). Effects of feedback and calibration on the verbal estimation of the duration of tones. Acta Psychologica, 126, 1–17.
Wearden, J. H., & Ferrara, A. (1995). Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 289–310.
Wearden, J. H., & McShane, B. (1988). Interval production as an analogue of the peak procedure: Evidence for similarity of human and animal timing processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40B, 363–375.
Wearden, J. H., Wearden, A. J., & Rabbitt, P. (1997). Age and IQ effects on stimulus and response timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 962–979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wearden, J. (2016). Methods Commonly Used in Time Perception Research. In: The Psychology of Time Perception. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40883-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40883-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-40882-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40883-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)