Abstract
This chapter presents critical participatory action research as a response to the critique of traditional social enquiry traditions of research. By reconceptualising the traditional view of the relationship between theory and practice participants seek to transform for themselves (1) their understandings of their practices; (2) the conduct of their practices, and (3) the conditions under which they practise. Transformation of a social practice requires critical participatory action researchers to take a critical stance: to ask whether a practice is irrational, sustainable and/or unjust. The chapter describes different traditions in the study of practice and locates critical participatory action research as a form of research from within practice traditions—research by participants themselves, into their shared practices. The chapter aims to disrupt tendencies to ‘scientise’ social research, and suggests instead that critical participatory action researchers see themselves as writing and changing the histories of the settings in which they live and work. The chapter suggests that critical participatory action researchers view their research as a process of gathering local historical evidence about their changing practices and the changing conditions under which they practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For an extended critique of the positivist approach to social and educational research, see Carr and Kemmis (1986).
- 2.
For a view of critical history, see R. G. Collingwood’s (1946) The Idea of History; for his view on what counts as evidence in history, see pp. 249–283 Epilegomena 3: ‘Historical evidence’. You can find it online at: http://www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/Collingwood/1946_3.html.
References
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.
Collingwood, R. G. (1946). The idea of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463–474.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research (Chapter 23). In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005) Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere (Chapter 23). In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–604). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (Eds.). (2008). Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense.
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., Nixon, R. (2014). A New View of Research: Research Within Practice Traditions. In: The Action Research Planner. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-66-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-67-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)