Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Preservice Teachers’ Approaches to Learning and Their Learning Outcomes: A Malaysian Experience

  • Chapter
The Psychology of Asian Learners

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to establish the validity of a Malay language “approaches to learning” questionnaire, the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), for use with Malaysian preservice teachers by undertaking psychometrical testing, including confirmatory factor analysis. Upon its validation, the study subsequently set out to gain greater insight into the associations between Malaysian preservice teachers’ approaches to learning and their learning outcomes as measured by their CGPA, acquisition of generic skills (problem-solving, critical and analytical skills, and the ability to work together as a team), and overall satisfaction. The two-factor structure of the Malay language R-SPQ-2F was confirmed at the main scale level (deep and surface approaches). A scatter plot showed that preservice teachers had higher scores for the deep approach than for surface approach to learning. Strong correlations were found between deep approaches to learning and greater acquisition of generic skills, between deep approaches to learning and higher overall satisfaction, and between greater acquisition of generic skills and higher overall satisfaction. Inversely, negative correlations were found between surface approaches and overall satisfaction. However, there were no associations between preservice teachers’ approaches to learning and CGPA scores. Several explanations and implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akande, A. (1998). Towards the multicultural validation of a western model of student learning approaches. Education, 119(1), 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 389–444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, J. M., & Gunstone, R. (2003). Going deeper than deep and surface approaches: A study of students’ perceptions of time. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 55–69. doi:10.1080/1356251032000052320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1998). Approaches to learning and forms of understanding. In B. Dart & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 72–101). Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijbels, D., van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, P. S. C. (2006). Assessing the approaches to learning of twinning programme students in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 3, 93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, P. S. C. (2008). Teaching practices that hinder deep approaches to learning of twinning program students in Malaysia: A qualitative perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, P. S. C., Wong, K. T., & Osman, R. (2012). Student-teachers’ approaches to learning, academic performance and teaching efficacy. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 9, 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C., & Debus, R. (2002). Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 483–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C., Simpson, T., & Debus, R. (2001). Improving quality learning in a preservice teacher education program. Retrieved January 23, 2014 from http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/gor01441.htm

  • Hassan, M. (2002). Academic satisfaction and approaches to learning among United Arab Emirates university students. Social Behaviour and Personality, 30(5), 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Watkins, D. (1981). Australian and Filipino investigations of the internal structure of Biggs’ new study process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(2), 241–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immekus, J. C., & Imbrie, R. K. (2010). A test and cross-validation of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire factor structure among western university students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 495–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1990). Cultural specificity of approaches to study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60(3), 356–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Ng, S., Tse, H., Wong, E. T. T., & Pomfret, M. (1996). An examination of the interrelationships between workload, study time, learning approaches and academic outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Wong, A., & Leung, D. (1999). Reconsidering the dimensions approach to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. B., Ganotice, F. A., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). Validation of the Chinese version of the sense of self (SOS) scale. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(2), 323–331. doi:10.1007/s12564-011-9195-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2002). Embracing a philosophy of lifelong learning in higher education. Starting with faculty’s beliefs about their role as educators. To Improve the Academy, 21, 288–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C., Cranton, P. A., & Allen, K. (2000). If lifelong learning is important: The relationships between students’ self-directed learning readiness, their psychological type, learning style, and creative thinking and logical reasoning abilities. In H. Long (Ed.), Theory and practice in self-directed learning (pp. 97–115). Schaumburg, IL: Motorola Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, D. Y. P., Ginns, P., & Kember, D. (2008). Examining the cultural specificity of approaches to learning in universities in Hong Kong and Sydney. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2003). Broadening understanding of the phenomenon of dissonance. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning – I outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbashian, A., Huon, G. F., & Bird, K. D. (2004). Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams. Higher Education, 47(2), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, M., & Child, D. (1984). Biggs’ SPQ: A British study of its internal structure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(2), 228–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petegem, P., Donche, V., & Vanhoof, J. (2005). Relating pre-service teachers’ approaches to learning and preferences for constructivist learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 8(3), 309–332. doi:10.1007/s10984-005-1564-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramburuth, P. (2000, July 5–9). Cross cultural learning behaviour in higher education: perceptions versus practice. In Ultibase Articles, paper originally presented at the seventh international Literacy and Education Research Network (LERN) conference on learning, RMIT University, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. (2005). Bias-corrected estimation of noncentrality parameters of covariance structure models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(1), 120–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1994). Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education: A literature survey. Higher Education, 27(4), 449–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2005). An investigation into student approaches to learning in multicultural university using the revised study process questionnaire. In A. Brew & C. Asmar (Eds.), Higher education in a changing world: Higher educational research and development (pp. 533–541). Sydney, Australia: HERDSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S., Renshaw, P., & Tietzel, K. (1994). A short-term longitudinal investigation of cross-cultural differences in study approaches using Biggs’ SPQ questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(2), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (1996). Learning theories and approaches, a cross-cultural perspective. In D. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 3–24). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D., & Akande, A. (1992). Assessing the approaches to learning of Nigerian students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 17(1), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (1981). The learning processes of Australian university students: Investigations of contextual and personological factors. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(3), 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D., & Regmi, M. (1990). An investigation of the approach to learning of Nepalese tertiary students. Higher Education, 20(4), 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achieving goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. F. (2000). University students’ learning approached in three cultures: An investigation of Biggs’ 3P model. The Journal of Psychology, 134(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education & Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjung Malim, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia

    Pauline Swee Choo Goh

Authors
  1. Pauline Swee Choo Goh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pauline Swee Choo Goh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Ronnel B. King

  2. Department of Psychology Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China

    Allan B. I. Bernardo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goh, P.S.C. (2016). Preservice Teachers’ Approaches to Learning and Their Learning Outcomes: A Malaysian Experience. In: King, R., Bernardo, A. (eds) The Psychology of Asian Learners. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-575-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-576-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation