Abstract
I started working in Hong Kong in 1987. David Watkins arrived at the University of Hong Kong shortly after. At the time there were some very negative perceptions of the way Chinese students approached learning tasks, but little in the way of credible research into the topic. This chapter tries to tell the story of how a better understanding was gained of the body of research which was often referred to as the ‘paradox of the Chinese learner’. Chinese students were perceived as employing learning approaches which had been associated with poor learning outcomes in Western research. Yet international comparison studies showed Chinese students performing very well.
A group in Hong Kong were interested in gaining a better understanding of Hong Kong students through research following the students’ approaches to learning paradigm. Much of the research aimed to improve student learning outcomes through helping teachers design teaching and learning in such a way as to promote meaningful learning outcomes. This brings in the chapter’s second focus of teaching the Chinese learner, which gives the chapter a practical focus as the insights gained from the research should help teachers better understand how to bring out the positive side of Chinese, and possibly other Asian, learners.
Two strands of evidence are advanced to explain the paradox. Research in Hong Kong and China has uncovered evidence of a set of approaches to learning, intermediate between pure surface and deep approaches, which combine memorisation and understanding. Observations of Chinese students apparently attempting to memorise material could have been misinterpreted as rote memorisation, when in fact the memorisation was combined with attempts to reach understanding and was therefore not a surface approach. When Chinese students do employ a surface approach, it is likely to be a response to perceptions of contextual factors in the teaching and learning environment, rather than as a characteristic of a cultural group or a predominant regional trait.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.
Bond, M. H. (Ed.). (1996). The handbook of Chinese psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bond, M. H. (Ed.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Case, J., & Marshall, D. (2004). Between deep and surface: Procedural approaches to learning in engineering education contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 29(5), 605–615.
Entwistle, N., & Entwistle, D. (2003). Preparing for examinations: The interplay of memorising and understanding, and the development of knowledge objects. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 19–41.
Hess, R. D., & Azuma, M. (1991). Cultural support for schooling: Contrasts between Japan and the United States. Educational Researcher, 20(9), 2–8.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1981). Americans and Chinese: Passage to differences (3rd ed.). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Kember, D. (1996). The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning? Higher Education, 31, 341–351.
Kember, D. (2000a). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40(1), 99–121.
Kember, D. (2000b). Action learning and action research: Improving the quality of teaching and learning. London: Kogan Page.
Kember, D. (2001). Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 205–221.
Kember, D. (2007). Reconsidering open and distance learning in the developing world: Meeting students’ learning needs. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Kember, D. (2010). Opening up the road to nowhere: problems with the path to mass higher education in Hong Kong. Higher Education, 59(2), 167–179.
Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1990). Cultural specificity of approaches to study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 356–363.
Kember, D., Jenkins, W., & Ng, K. C. (2003). Adult students’ perceptions of good teaching as a function of their conceptions of learning – Part 1. Influencing the development of self-determination. Studies in Continuing Education, 25(2), 240–251.
Kember, D., & McNaught, C. (2007). Enhancing university teaching: Lessons from research into award winning teachers. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Kember, D., et al. (2001). Reflective teaching and learning in the health professions. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1989). Cultural specificity of approaches to study. Paper presented the 6th annual conference of the Hong Kong Educational Research Association, Hong Kong.
Lee, W. O. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learners: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 25–41). Melbourne, Australia/Hong Kong: Australian Council for Educational Research and the Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Leung, D. Y. P., Ginns, P., & Kember, D. (2008). Examining the cultural specificity of approaches to learning in universities in Hong Kong and Sydney. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 251–266.
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Kun, T. L. (1996). Memorising and understanding: The keys to the paradox? In D. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 69–84). Melbourne, Australia/Hong Kong: Australian Council for Educational Research and the Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning, outcome and process I. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15 year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Stevenson, H. W., & Lee, S. Y. (1996). The academic achievement of Chinese students. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
Tang, K. C. C. (1991). Effects of different assessment methods on tertiary students’ approaches to studying. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hong Kong.
Tang, T. (1993). Inside the classroom: The students’ view. In J. B. Biggs & D. A. Watkins (Eds.), Learning and teaching in Hong Kong: What is and what might be (pp. 35–52). Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, Hong Kong.
University Grants Committee of Hong Kong. (2006). Facts and figures 2005. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee Secretariat. Retrieved August 16, 2006, from http://www.ugc.edu.hk/english/documents/figures/
Watkins, D. (1996). Hong Kong secondary school learners: A developmental perspective. In D. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 107–119). Melbourne, Australia/Hong Kong: Australian Council for Educational Research and the Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Watkins, D. & Biggs, J.B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Melbourne/Hong Kong: Australian Council for Educational Research and the Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Yang, K. S., & Yu, A. B. (1988). Social- and individual-oriented achievement motivation: Conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the symposium on Chinese personality and social psychology, 24th international congress of psychology, Sydney.
Yu, E. S. H. (1974). Achievement motive, familism and hsiao: A replication of McClelland-Winterbottom studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Notre Dame.
Yu, A. B. (1996). Ultimate life concerns, self, and Chinese achievement motivation. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 227–246). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kember, D. (2016). Understanding and Teaching the Chinese Learner: Resolving the Paradox of the Chinese Learner. In: King, R., Bernardo, A. (eds) The Psychology of Asian Learners. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-575-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-576-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)