Abstract
International assessments show that the performance of Spanish students in core cognitive competencies is close to the international average and its socioeconomic gradient is below the mean of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Additionally, the performance gap between students in socioeconomically advantaged and socioeconomically disadvantaged schools is relatively small. While these may be seen as remarkable facts, given the comparatively low socioeconomic level of Spanish families and the depth of the scars of the economic crisis, a closer look uncovers a more complex reality. For example, the likelihood of low performance and grade repetition among socioeconomically disadvantaged students relative to non-disadvantaged students is high and important differences across regions still prevail. In this chapter, we describe the recent evolution and situation of socioeconomic inequalities of school-aged Spanish students and discuss the policies that have been applied to tackle the socioeconomic-based performance gap. These policies have been developed within the framework of changing state-level general education acts and designed and applied at the regional level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For the distribution of students according to the ownership of the school, see Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (MECD, 2017) and Eurostat on-line database.
- 2.
Source: Retrieved from the EUROSTAT Database: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=t2020_40.
- 3.
Source: Retrieved from the INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística) Database: http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es.
- 4.
For Spain, the selected definition of SES underestimates the socioeconomic differences between natives and immigrants. The use of alternative definitions, such as occupational category or the ESCS index provided by PISA, increases these differences.
- 5.
The MECD published in 2010 a document with a series of possible agreements, entitled Pacto social y político por la educación. Some of these possible agreements concern the following areas: evaluation of education, promotion of Professional Training, use of ICTs, promotion of plurilingualism, modernization and internationalization of the universities, scholarships and study aids, professional and social recognition of teachers and inclusive education, diversity and interculturality.
- 6.
All of the data referring to the distribution of the population by education level come from the European Union Labour Force Survey. Retrieved from the EUROSTAT Database: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/microdata/european-union-labour-force-survey.
References
Aparicio-Fenoll, A. (2016). Returns to education and educational outcomes: The case of the Spanish housing boom. Journal of Human Capital, 10(2), 235–265. https://doi.org/10.1086/686154.
Berkowitz, R., Moore, H., Astor, R. A., & Benbenishty, R. (2017). A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 425–469. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669821.
Calero, J., & Escardíbul, J. O. (2017). La calidad del profesorado en la adquisición de competencias de los alumnos. Un análisis basado en PIRLS-2011. Madrid, Spain: Fundación Ramón Areces, Fundación Europea Sociedad y Educación. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/efse/docs/la-calidad-del-profesorado.
Choi, Á., & Calero, J. (2013). Determinantes del riesgo de fracaso escolar en España en PISA-2009 y propuestas de reforma. Revista de Educación, 362, 562–593. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2013-362-242.
Choi, Á., Gil, M., Mediavilla, M., & Valbuena, J. (2017). The evolution of educational inequalities in Spain: Dynamic evidence from repeated cross-sections. Social Indicators Research, 138(3), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1701-6.
Choi, Á., & Jerrim, J. (2016). The use (and misuse) of PISA in guiding policy reform: The case of Spain. Comparative Education, 52(2), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1142739.
Guio, J., Choi, Á., & Escardíbul, J.-O. (2018). Labor markets, academic performance and school dropout risk: Evidence for Spain. International Journal of Manpower, 39(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-08-2016-0158.
Manacorda, M. (2012). The cost of grade retention. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(2), 596–606. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00165.
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. (2010). Pacto social y político por la educación. Madrid, Spain: Author. Retrieved from http://www.apega.org/attachments/article/254/pacto-educativo-final-22-abril.pdf.
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. (2013). El alumnado gitano en secundaria. Un estudio comparado. Madrid, Spain: Author. Retrieved from https://www.gitanos.org/upload/92/20/EstudioSecundaria.pdf.
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. (2017). Sistema estatal de indicadores de la educación. Edición 2017. Madrid, Spain: Author. Retrieved from http://www.mecd.gob.es/dctm/inee/indicadores/2017/2017-seie-final-21-julio-2017.pdf?documentId=0901e72b8260b0e1.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016a). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016b). PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en.
Ou, S.-R., & Reynolds, A. J. (2008). Predictors of educational attainment in the Chicago longitudinal study. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.199.
Schleicher, A. (2007). Can competencies assessed by PISA be considered the fundamental school knowledge 15-year-olds should possess? Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9042-x.
Zinovyeva, N., Felgueroso, F., & Vazquez, P. (2014). Immigration and student achievement in Spain: Evidence from PISA. SERIEs—Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 5(1), 25–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Choi, Á., Calero, J. (2019). Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes in Spanish Schools. In: Volante, L., Schnepf, S., Jerrim, J., Klinger, D. (eds) Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes. Education Policy & Social Inequality, vol 4. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9863-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9863-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9862-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9863-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)