Skip to main content

Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes

Part of the book series: Education Policy & Social Inequality ((EPSI,volume 4))

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of (a) the Australian education system (including a historical overview from 1970 to today); (b) an exploration of socioeconomic inequality in IQ, academic achievement in high-stakes tests, and critical non-cognitive factors from the start of school to near the end of middle school; (c) an exploration of socioeconomic inequality in achievement in adolescent birth cohorts from the 1960s to 2000; and (d) a reflection on how education policy has influenced inequality and what may need to be done to redress it in the future. We find that inequalities present at the beginning of school tend to get larger as children age and that historical inequalities have also tended to increase over time. While Australia has had a large number of private schools since the 1970s, we argue that recent cultural changes have resulted in schools being seen as a market and that this has driven up ability stratification between schools and may account for increased inequality over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., & Lehr, C. A. (2004). Check & connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42(2), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1993). Education markets, choice and social class: The market as a class stratergy in the UK and the USA. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, A., Gillard, J., Firth, V., Scrymgour, M., Welford, R., Lomax-Smith, J., … Constable, E. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for Young Australians. USA: ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of higher education in Australia: Final report. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., & Proctor, H. (2014). A history of Australian schooling. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., Proctor, H., & Sherington, G. (2009). School choice: How parents negotiate the new school market in Australia. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). PPVT-III: Peabody picture vocabulary test. American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsey, M., Proctor, H., & Stacey, M. (2017). A most poisonous debate: Legitimizing support for Australian private schools. In T. Koinzer, R. Nikolai, & F. Waldow (Eds.), Private schools and school choice in compulsory education (pp. 49–66). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2009). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, K. J., Mitrou, F., Povey, J., Campbell, A., & Zubrick, S. R. (2018). Educational inequality across three generations in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 53(1), 34–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J., & Rubinstein, Y. (2001). The importance of noncognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. American Economic Review, 91(2), 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, D. (2018). What price the gap? Education and inequality in Australia. Retrieved from https://publiceducationfoundation.org.au/what-price-the-gap-education-and-inequality-in-australia/.

  • Holme, J. J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 177–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerrim, J., Parker, P. D., Katyn Chmielewski, A., & Anders, J. (2015). Private schooling, educational transitions, and early labour market outcomes: Evidence from three anglophone countries. European Sociological Review, 32(2), 280–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kautz, T., Heckman, J. J., Diris, R., Ter Weel, B., & Borghans, L. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills: Improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledgar, J. (1996). Overview of the Australian education system. Higher Education in Europe, 21(4), 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. N., & Rothman, S. (2003). Longitudinal studies of Australian youth. Australian Economic Review, 36(4), 428–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, M., Dobia, B., Yeung, A. S., Barker, K. L., Power, A., & Watson, K. (2008). Positive behaviour for learning: Investigating the transfer of a United States system into the New South Wales Department of Education and Training Western Sydney Region Schools: Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R., & Weinhardt, F. (2018). Top of the class: The importance of ordinal rank (No. w24958). National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, A. (2016). Inequality in children’s contexts: Income segregation of households with and without children. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 549–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, P. D., Jerrim, J., Schoon, I., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A multination study of socioeconomic inequality in expectations for progression to higher education: The role of between-school tracking and ability stratification. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 6–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Anders, J., Shure, N., & Dicke, T. (2018a). An information distortion model of social class differences in math self-concept, intrinsic value, and utility value. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 445–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Jerrim, J. P., Guo, J., & Dicke, T. (2018b). Inequity and excellence in academic performance: Evidence from 27 countries. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 836–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, G., & Sanson, A. (1999). The association of behavioural adjustment to temperament, parenting and family characteristics among 5-year-old children. Social Development, 8(3), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petermann, F., & Petermann, U. (2011). Wechsler intelligence scale for children® (4th ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, A., & Margaret, W. (2003). PISA Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) PISA 2000 technical report: PISA 2000 technical report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research, A. C. O. E. (2018). Youth in transition, 1961 Cohort (Publication no. doi/https://doi.org/10.4225/87/gb0kc4) from ADA Dataverse http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/87/GB0KC4.

  • Rowe, E. E., & Lubienski, C. (2017). Shopping for schools or shopping for peers: Public schools and catchment area segregation. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 340–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanson, A., Nicholson, J., Ungerer, J., Zubrick, S., Wilson, K., Ainley, J., … Harrison, L. (2002). Longitudinal study of Australian children (Discussion Paper 1). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2014). Age of opportunity: Lessons from the new science of adolescence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Parker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parker, P., Guo, J., Sanders, T. (2019). Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes in Australia. In: Volante, L., Schnepf, S., Jerrim, J., Klinger, D. (eds) Socioeconomic Inequality and Student Outcomes. Education Policy & Social Inequality, vol 4. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9863-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9863-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9862-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9863-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics