Abstract
This chapter introduces the utility of photography in social research and outlines different data collection methods that researchers can employ. The power of the photograph is discussed and then questions about representation are examined. The idea of the photograph as a ‘fold’ is proposed as one way of helping to integrate varying perspectives on the issue of representation. An examination of commonly used photographic research methods is presented that explains their uses and relative strengths and weaknesses. A new approach is proposed called the ‘snapshot’ that provides opportunities for gaining new and unique insights into people’s lives. The chapter concludes with an examination of the emic and etic qualities of research photography and why this matters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aubusson, K. (2015, August 21). The story behind the heartbreaking photo of refugee family shared by thousands. The Sydney Morning Herald.
Allen, L. (2009). ‘Snapped’: Researching the sexual cultures of schools using visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(5), 549–561.
Allen, Q. (2012). Photographs and stories: Ethics, benefits and dilemmas of using participant photography with Black middle-class male youth. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 443–458.
Allen, Q. (2016). ‘Tell your own story’: Manhood, masculinity and racial socialization among black fathers and their sons. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(10), 1831–1848.
Amerson, R., & Livingston, W. G. (2014). Reflexive photography: An alternative method for documenting the learning process of cultural competence. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 25(2), 202–210.
Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage Publications.
Bateson, G., & Mead, M. (1942). Balinese character: A photographic analysis. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Baum, F., MacDougall, C., & Smith, D. (2006). Glossary: Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1979-), 60(10), 854–857.
Becker, H. S. (1974). Photography and sociology. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1(1), 3–26.
Bell, E., & Davison, J. (2013). Visual management studies: Empirical and theoretical approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 167–184.
Berger, J. (1968). Understanding a photograph. New Society, 12(316), 572–573.
Berreman, G. D. (1966). Anemic and emetic analyses in social anthropology. American Anthropologist, 68(2), 346–354.
Bignante, E. (2010). The use of photo-elicitation in field research. Exploring Maasai representations and use of natural resources. EchoGéo, 11, doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.11622.
Bolton, A., Pole, C., & Mizen, P. (2001). Picture this: Researching child workers. Sociology, 35(2), 501–518.
Boxall, K., & Ralph, S. (2009). Research ethics and the use of visual images in research with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34(1), 45–54.
Brekke, J.-P. (2003). Photography as tool in social research. Institute for Social Research, 11, 1–5.
Bridger, L. (2013). Seeing and telling households: A case for photo elicitation and graphic elicitation in qualitative research graduate. Journal of social Science, 10(2), 106–131.
Brummitt, W. (1973). Photography is. U.S.: Amphoto Books.
Burgin, V. (1982). Looking at photographs. In V. Burgin (Ed.), Thinking photography (Vol. 1, pp. 142–153, Vol. 2).
Byrne, E., Daykin, N., & Coad, J. (2016). Participatory photography in qualitative research: A methodological review. Visual Methodologies, 4(2), 1–12.
Cartier-Bresson, H. (1952). The decisive moment: Photography by Henri Cartier-Bresson. Si Mon and Schuster.
Catalani, C., & Minkler, M. (2010). Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Education & Behavior, 37(3), 424–451.
Chaplin, E. (2002). Sociology and visual representation. Routledge.
Chapman, M. V., Wu, S., & Zhu, M. (2016). What is a picture worth? A primer for coding and interpreting photographic data. Qualitative Social Work, 1–15.
Chapman, T. K. (2005). Expressions of “voice” in portraiture. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 27–51.
Clark-Ibáñez, M. (2004). Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1507–1527.
Close, H. (2007). The use of photography as a qualitative research tool: With reference to her own study of children with long-term conditions, Helen Close considers whether photography as a research method can be both valuable and ethical. Nurse Researcher, 15(1), 27–36.
Coe, B., & Gates, P. (1977). The Snapshot photograph: The rise of popular photography, 1888–1939. University of California, Ash & Grant.
Collier, J. (1957). Photography in anthropology: A report on two experiments. American Anthropologist, 59(5), 843–859.
Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New York Press.
Cope, V., Jones, B., & Hendricks, J. (2015). Portraiture: A methodology through which success and positivity can be explored and reflected. Nurse Researcher, 22(3), 6–12.
Coulter, G. (2013). Gerhard Richter’s use of photography to challenge our understanding of the real. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(10), 83–92.
Covert, H. H., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Layers of narratives, images, and analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 15(3), 306–318.
Dados, N. (2010). Liminal transformations: Folding the surface of the photograph. Conserveries mémorielles. Revue transdisciplinaire, 7, 1–16.
Davies, D. (2008). How photographs “signify”: Cartier-Bresson’s “reply” to Scruton (pp. 167–186). Photography and philosophy: Essays on the pencil of nature.
Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. University of Minnesota Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dixson, A. D., Chapman, T. K., & Hill, D. A. (2005). Research as an aesthetic process: Extending the portraiture methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 16–26.
East, L., Jackson, D., O’Brien, L., & Peters, K. (2010). Storytelling: an approach that can help to develop resilience: Relating personal experiences can help participants to cope with their conditions and improve research, explain Leah East, Debra Jackson, Louise O’Brien and Kathleen Peters. Nurse Researcher, 17(3), 17–25.
Evans-Agnew, R. A., & Rosemberg, M.-A. S. (2016). Questioning photovoice research: Whose voice? Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1019–1030.
Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Walters, S. (2004). Images, interviews and interpretations: Making connections in visual research. In C. J. Pole (Ed.), Seeing is believing? Approaches to visual research (Vol. 7, pp. 105–121). Burlington: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Fitzgerald, M. (2015, August 18). An entire country’s pain captured in one father’s face. Syrian refugee family arrives at Kos. Pic by @DanielEtterFoto [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/maryfitzger/status/633704828217241601.
Flusser, V. (1983). Towards a philosophy of photography. London: Reaktion Books.
Freshwater, D., & Rolfe, G. (2001). Critical reflexivity: A politically and ethically engaged research method for nursing. NT Research, 6(1), 526–537.
Goessling, K., & Doyle, C. (2009). Thru the Lenz: Participatory action research, photography, and creative process in an urban high school. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 4(4), 343–365.
Gothóni, R. (2015). Emic, etic and ethics. Some remarks on studying a foreign religion. Studia Orientalia Helsinki, 50, 29–41.
Hannes, K., & Parylo, O. (2014). Let’s play it safe: Ethical considerations from participants in a photovoice research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 255–274.
Harley, A. (2012). Picturing reality: Power, ethics, and politics in using photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 320–339.
Harper, D. (1988). Visual sociology: Expanding sociological vision. The American Sociologist, 19(1), 54–70.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
Harrington, C. E., & Schibik, T. J. (2003). Reflexive photography as an alternative method for the study of the freshman year experience. NASPA Journal, 41(1), 23–40.
He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2017). Choosing an adequate design and analysis in cross-cultural personality research. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 3(1).
Heisley, D. D., & Levy, S. J. (1991). Autodriving: A photoelicitation technique. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 257–272.
Higgins, J. (2013). Why it does not have to be in focus: Modern photography explained. Thames & Hudson.
Higgins, M. (2016). Placing photovoice under erasure: A critical and complicit engagement with what it theoretically is (not). International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(5), 670–685.
Hill, L. (2014). ‘Some of it I haven’t told anybody else’: Using photo elicitation to explore the experiences of secondary school education from the perspective of young people with a diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorder. Educational and Child Psychology, 31(1), 79–89.
Hirsch, R. (1992). Nathan Lyons on the Snapshot. CEPA, Winter 1992–1993, 6–9.
Hurworth, R. (2004). Photo-interviewing. Qualitative Research Journal, 4(1), 73–79.
Johnsen, S., May, J., & Cloke, P. (2008). Imag (in) ing ‘homeless places’: Using auto-photography to (re) examine the geographies of homelessness. Area, 40(2), 194–207.
Johnston, G. (2016). Champions for social change: Photovoice ethics in practice and ‘false hopes’ for policy and social change. Global Public Health, 11(5–6), 799–811.
Kanstrup, A. M. (2002). Picture the practice—Using photography to explore use of technology within teachers’ work practices. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), Art. 17.
Keene, D. E., & Padilla, M. B. (2014). Spatial stigma and health inequality. Critical Public Health, 24(4), 392–404.
Lapenta, F. (2011). Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201–214). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Latham, A. (2004). Researching and writing everyday accounts of the city: An introduction to the diary-photo diary-interview method. Routledge.
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. Basic Books.
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1986). On goodness in schools: Themes of empowerment. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(3), 9–28.
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (2005). Reflections on portraiture: A dialogue between art and science. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 3–15.
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. Jossey-Bass Incorporated Pub.
Lomax, Y. (1995). Folds in the photograph. Third Text, 9(32), 43–58.
Lorenz, L. S., & Kolb, B. (2009). Involving the public through participatory visual research methods. Health Expectations, 12(3), 262–274.
Marks, L. U. (2008). Experience—Information—Image: A historiography of unfolding. Arab cinema as example. Cultural Studies Review, 14(1), 85–98.
Meo, A. I. (2010). Picturing students’ habitus: The advantages and limitations of photo-elicitation interviewing in a qualitative study in the city of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(2), 149–171.
Miller, K. (2015). Dear Critics: Addressing concerns and justifying the benefits of photography as a research method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), Art. 27.
Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(6), 684–697.
Mitchell, C., de Lange, N., & Nguyen, X. T. (2016). Visual ethics with and through the body: The participation of girls with disabilities in Vietnam in a photovoice project. In Learning Bodies (pp. 241–257). Springer.
Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 781–796.
Munir, K. A., & Phillips, N. (2005). The birth of the ‘Kodak Moment’: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1665–1687.
Ngunjiri, F. W. (2007). Painting a counter-narrative of African womanhood: Reflections on how my research transformed me. Journal of Research Practice, 3(1), 4.
Nickel, D. R. (2000). Roland Barthes and the snapshot. History of Photography, 24(3), 232–235.
Noland, C. M. (2006). Auto-photography as research practice: Identity and self-esteem research. Journal of Research Practice, 2(1), 1.
O’Brien, P. (2015, August 19). All the words and TV reporting of the refugee crisis in a single photo. Humbled by @DanielEtterFoto [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/paraicobrien/status/633935385882697728.
Packard, J. (2008). ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: The power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies, 23(1), 63–77.
Padgett, D. K., Smith, B. T., Derejko, K.-S., Henwood, B. F., & Tiderington, E. (2013). A picture is worth…? Photo elicitation interviewing with formerly homeless adults. Qualitative Health Research, 23(11), 1435–1444.
Parker, L. D. (2009). Photo-elicitation: An ethno-historical accounting and management research prospect. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(7), 1111–1129.
Peters, M., & Mergen, B. (1977). “Doing the rest”: The uses of photographs in American studies. American Quarterly, 29(3), 280–303.
Pike, K. L. (1954). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton.
Plummer, S. (2015). Photography as expanding form: Virtual and actual expansion in the work of Saron Hughes and Martina Corry. Photographies, 8(2), 137–153.
Plunkett, R., Leipert, B. D., & Ray, S. L. (2013). Unspoken phenomena: Using the photovoice method to enrich phenomenological inquiry. Nursing Inquiry, 20(2), 156–164.
Radley, A., Hodgetts, D., & Cullen, A. (2005). Visualizing homelessness: A study in photography and estrangement. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15(4), 273–295.
Ray, J. L., & Smith, Anne D. (2011). Worth a thousand words: Photographs as a novel methodological tool in strategic management. In Building Methodological (Ed.), Bridges (pp. 289–326). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Richard, V. M., & Lahman, M. K. (2015). Photo-elicitation: Reflexivity on method, analysis, and graphic portraits. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 3–22.
Richter, G. (1995). The daily practice of painting: Writings and interviews 1962–1993 (H. U. Obrist, & D. Britt, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, in association with Anthony d’Offay Gallery, London.
Roberts, B. (2011). Photographic portraits: Narrative and memory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(2), Art. 6.
Rose, G. (2000). Practising photography: An archive, a study, some photographs and a researcher. Journal of Historical Geography, 26(4), 555–571.
Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Ryan, L., & Mackinnon, S. L. (2016). Photovoice: Through the lens-a case study. Youth Engagement in Health Promotion, 1(1), 1–10.
Schroeder, J. E. (2012). Style and strategy: Snapshot aesthetics in brand culture. In P. Quattrone, N. Thrift, C. Mclean, & F.-R. Puyou (Eds.), Imagining organizations: Performative imagery in business and beyond. London: Routledge.
Schulze, S. (2007). The usefulness of reflexive photography for qualitative research: A case study in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(5), 536–553.
Schwartz, D. (1989). Visual ethnography: Using photography in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 12(2), 119–154.
Scruton, R. (1981). Photography and representation. Critical Inquiry, 7(3), 577–603.
Seligman, M. (1991). Learned optimism (cultural studies review). New York: AA Knopf.
Smith, C. Z., & Woodward, A.-M. (1998). Photo-elicitation method gives voice and reactions of subjects. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 53(4), 31–41.
Soszynski, M. (2006). How do pictures represent? Philosophy Now, 57, 20–21.
Spencer, S. (2011). Visual research methods in the social sciences: Awakening visions. London: Routledge.
Strack, R. W., Magill, C., & McDonagh, K. (2004). Engaging youth through photovoice. Health Promotion Practice, 5(1), 49–58.
Tanjasiri, S. P., Lew, R., Kuratani, D. G., Wong, M., & Fu, L. (2011). Using Photovoice to assess and promote environmental approaches to tobacco control in AAPI communities. Health Promotion Practice, 12(5), 654–665.
Tinkler, P. (2014). Getting started: Using photos in research. Using photographs in social and historical research (pp. 3–27). London: SAGE Publications.
Torre, D., & Murphy, J. (2015). A different lens: Using photo-elicitation interviews in education research. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(111), 1–26.
Van House, N. A. (2006). Interview viz: Visualization-assisted photo elicitation. In CHI’06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, Quebac, Canada, 2006 (pp. 1463–1468). ACM.
Wallace, L. (2015). Reflexive photography, attitudes, behavior, and CALL: ITAs improving spoken English intelligibility. Calico Journal, 32(3), 449–479.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1994). Empowerment through photo Novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 171–186.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.
Wang, C. C., Yi, W. K., Tao, Z. W., & Carovano, K. (1998). Photovoice as a participatory health promotion strategy. Health Promotion International, 13(1), 75–86.
Warren, S. (2005). Photography and voice in critical qualitative management research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 861–882.
Waterhouse, J. (2007). From narratives to portraits: Methodology and methods to portray leadership. The Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 271–286.
West, N. M. (2000). Kodak and the Lens of Nostalgia. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Woodward, S. (2008). Digital photography and research relationships: Capturing the fashion moment. Sociology, 42(5), 857–872.
Yoshihama, M. (2016). Images of the invisible and visions for the future: Photovoice following the great East Japan Disasters. In Third ISA forum of sociology (July 10–14, 2016), Vienna, Austria, 2016. Isaconf.
Yoshihama, M., & Carr, E. S. (2002). Community participation reconsidered: Feminist participatory action research with Hmong women. Journal of Community Practice, 10(4), 85–103.
Zuromskis, C. (2013). Snapshot photography: The lives of images. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Langmann, S., Pick, D. (2018). Research Photography Is…. In: Photography as a Social Research Method. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7279-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7279-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7277-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7279-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)