Skip to main content

Enhanced Wiener Filter for Ultrasound image denoising

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
EMBEC & NBC 2017 (EMBEC 2017, NBC 2017)

Abstract

Speckle phenomenon strongly affects Ultra-Sound (US) images. Over the past last years, several efforts have been done in order to provide an effective denoising methodology. Although good results have been achieved in terms of noise reduction effectiveness, most of the proposed approaches are characterized by a high computational load and require the supervision of an external operator for tuning the input parameters. Within this manuscript, a novel approach for noise reduction is investigated, based on Wiener filter. With respect to classical Wiener filter, the proposed Enhanced Wiener filter is able to locally adapt itself. By automatically tuning its kernel a good combination of edges and details preservation with effective noise reduction can be reached. This behavior is achieved by implementing a Local Gaussian Markov Random Field for modeling the image. Due to its intrinsic characteristics, the computational burden of the algorithm is sensibly low compared to other widely adopted filters and the parameter tuning effort is minimal. Results on a simulated dataset are reported, showing the interesting performances of the approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Loupas T., McDicken W. N., Allan P. L.. An adaptive weighted medianfilter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images IEEETransactions on Circuits and Systems. 1989;36:129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karaman M., Kutay M. A., Bozdagi G.. An adaptive speckle suppressionfilter for medical ultrasonic imaging IEEE Transactions on MedicalImaging. 1995;14:283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mateo Juan L., Fernndez-Caballero Antonio. Finding out generaltendencies in speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images ExpertSystems with Applications. 2009;36:7786–7797.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wiener N.. Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of StationaryTime Series. Wiley, New York 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Perona P., Malik J.. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropicdiffusion IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and MachineIntelligence. 1990;12:629–639.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baselice F., Ferraioli G., Pascazio V.. A 3D MRI denoising algorithmbased on Bayesian theory BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 2017;16:25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu Yongjian, Acton S. T.. Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion IEEETransactions on Image Processing. 2002;11:1260–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baselice F., Ferraioli G., Pascazio V., Sorriso A.. Bayesian MRIdenoising in complex domain Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2017;38:112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baselice F., Ferraioli G., Pascazio V., Schirinzi G.. EnhancedWiener Filter for Desplecking Ultra-Sound Images in 2016IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blackledge J.M.. Quantitative Coherent Imaging. Academic, London1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lim J.S.. Two dimensional signal and image processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ) 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kay Steven M.. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory. Prentice-Hall PTR.1 ed. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baselice Fabio, Ferraioli Giampaolo, Pascazio Vito. A BayesianApproach for Relaxation Times Estimation in MRI Magnetic ResonanceImaging. 2016;34:312–325.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baselice Fabio, Caivano Rocchina, Cammarota Aldo, FerraioliGiampaolo, Pascazio Vito. T1 and T2 estimation in complex domain:First results on clinical data Concepts in MagneticResonance Part A. 2014;43:166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ambrosanio M., Baselice F., Ferraioli G., Pascazio V., Schirinzi G.. Enhanced Wiener filter for ultrasound image restorationyComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2017;underreview.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ramos-Llordn G., Vegas-Snchez-Ferrero G., Martin-Fernandez M.,Alberola-Lpez C., Aja-Fernndez S.. Anisotropic Diffusion Filter WithMemory Based on Speckle Statistics for Ultrasound Images IEEETransactions on Image Processing. 2015;24:345–358.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dabov K., Foi A., Katkovnik V., Egiazarian K.. Image Denoising bySparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering IEEETransactions on Image Processing. 2007;16:2080–2095.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen J. A., Svendsen N. B.. Calculation of pressure fields fromarbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducersIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and FrequencyControl. 1992;39:262–267.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tay P. C., Acton S. T., Hossack J. A.. Ultrasound Despeckling Usingan Adaptive Window Stochastic Approach in 2006 InternationalConference on Image Processing:2549-2552 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Baselice .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baselice, F., Ferraioli, G., Pascazio, V., Schirinzi, G. (2018). Enhanced Wiener Filter for Ultrasound image denoising. In: Eskola, H., Väisänen, O., Viik, J., Hyttinen, J. (eds) EMBEC & NBC 2017. EMBEC NBC 2017 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 65. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5121-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5122-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics