Skip to main content

The Assessment Phase of the Intervention Research Framework: Selecting a Study Sample

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intervention Research
  • 933 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is the second of four providing details about the Assessment phase of the Intervention Research Framework. This chapter provides details of how to describe the study population with enough detail to be meaningful to readers of the research. This chapter also details the importance and methods of selecting a study sample that is representative of the target population and therefore generalizable to the target group. Issues discussed in this chapter include: methods of selecting a random sample including a simple random sample, a systematic random sample, cluster and stratified sample, and how to use power calculations to determine sample size. Other issues discussed in this chapter include methods for random selection and allocation, and reducing non-respondent rate. A summary of the SHAHRP study sample is provided noting the study sample, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and attrition.

Objectives: By the end of this chapter readers will be able to:

  • Clearly define a study population

  • Identify the impact that the selection process will have on the generalizability of study results

  • Identify different methods for selecting a random study sample, including simple random sample and systematic random sample

  • Define cluster and stratified samples

  • Understand how to determine the size of the study sample using power calculations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Neuman L. Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Windsor R, Baranowski T, Clark, Cutter G. Evaluation of health promotion, health education and disease prevention programs. Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Graziano A, Raulin M. Research methods: a process of inquiry. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Australian National Statistical Service. Sample size calculator. http://www.nss.gov.au/nss/home.nsf/NSS/0A4A642C712719DCCA2571AB00243DC6?opendocument Dec, 2014. 2014.

  5. Office of Economic and Statistical Research, Queensland Treasury and Trade. Census 2011: Aboriginal and TorresStrait Islander Population in Queensland. Brisbane: Queensland Government; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McBride N. School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project: Reducing Alcohol Related Harms in Young People. PhD thesis. National Perth: Drug Research Institute; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nyanda McBride .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McBride, N. (2016). The Assessment Phase of the Intervention Research Framework: Selecting a Study Sample. In: Intervention Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1011-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1011-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1009-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1011-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics