Skip to main content

The Assessment Phase of the Intervention Research Framework: Study Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intervention Research
  • 955 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is the first of four chapters providing details about the Assessment phase of the Intervention Research Framework. This chapter provides information about the three distinct types of longitudinal behavioural assessment that contributes to proof of evidence: efficacy; effectiveness, and efficiency research. This chapter also considered the elements of research design that are required for a well-designed and rigorously conducted research study. These elements include: the composition of the study team; the components of a high quality study design with particular emphasis on: statement of hypotheses and objectives; the inclusion of a control group; the development of a study analysis plan; considerations around validity and reliability; various forms of bias which threaten the viability of a study; ethical considerations associated with intervention research particularly in schools; and costs associated with intervention research. This chapter also provides a summary of the costs associated with the SHAHRP study, and outlines the limitations (or potential areas of bias) in the SHAHRP study.

Objectives: By the end of this chapter readers will be able to:

  • Describe the efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency research components of the Intervention Research Framework and the contribution that they make to evidence

  • Identify the composition of an effective study team

  • Identify the basic components of ‘good quality’ study design

  • Identify potential sources of bias to a research study

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Holman D. The value of intervention research in health promotion. Presented at the Western Australian Health Promotion Foundation ‘Enriching and improving health promotion research’ seminar, 16 Oct 1996. Perth, Western Australia. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Windsor R, Baranowski T, Clark N, Cutter G. Evaluation of health promotion, health education and disease prevention programs. Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neuman L. Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Young J. Breaking down boaders: overcoming research isolation to build global collaborations. National Drug Research Seminar Series, 27th June. Perth, Western Australia. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Graziano A, Raulin M. Research methods: a process of inquiry. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gorman D, Huber C. The social construction of “evidence-based” drug prevention programs: A reanalysis of data from the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program. Eval Rev. 2009;33(4):396–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gandhi A, Murphy-Graham E, Petrosino A, Chrismer S, Weiss C. The Devil is in the detail. Examining the evidence for ‘proven’ school-based drug abuse prevention programs. Eval Rev. 2007;31(1):43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pannucci C, Wilkins E. Identifing and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McBride N, Farringdon F, Meuleners L, Midford R. School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project. Intervention development and research procedures: Monograph 59. Perth: National Drug Research Institute; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McBride N, Farringdon F, Midford R, Meuleners L, Philip M. Harm minimisation in school drug education. Final results of the school health and alcohol harm reduction project (SHAHRP). Addiction. 2004;99:278–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McKay M, McBride N, Sumnall H, Cole J. Reducing the harm from adolescent alcohol consumption: results from an adapted version of SHAHRP in Northern Ireland. J Subst Use 2012; Early Online: 2012; 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Australian Government, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council. Australian code for the responsible conduct of research. Australian Government Printing Services: Canberra; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organisation. Standards and operational guidence for ethics review of health-related research with human participants. ISBN 978 924 150294 8. World Health Organisation: Geneva; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McBride N. School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project: Reducing Alcohol Related Harms in Young People. PhD thesis. National Drug Research Institute: Perth 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nyanda McBride .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McBride, N. (2016). The Assessment Phase of the Intervention Research Framework: Study Design. In: Intervention Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1011-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1011-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1009-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1011-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics