Abstract
This chapter is the first of four chapters providing details about the Assessment phase of the Intervention Research Framework. This chapter provides information about the three distinct types of longitudinal behavioural assessment that contributes to proof of evidence: efficacy; effectiveness, and efficiency research. This chapter also considered the elements of research design that are required for a well-designed and rigorously conducted research study. These elements include: the composition of the study team; the components of a high quality study design with particular emphasis on: statement of hypotheses and objectives; the inclusion of a control group; the development of a study analysis plan; considerations around validity and reliability; various forms of bias which threaten the viability of a study; ethical considerations associated with intervention research particularly in schools; and costs associated with intervention research. This chapter also provides a summary of the costs associated with the SHAHRP study, and outlines the limitations (or potential areas of bias) in the SHAHRP study.
Objectives: By the end of this chapter readers will be able to:
-
Describe the efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency research components of the Intervention Research Framework and the contribution that they make to evidence
-
Identify the composition of an effective study team
-
Identify the basic components of ‘good quality’ study design
-
Identify potential sources of bias to a research study
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Holman D. The value of intervention research in health promotion. Presented at the Western Australian Health Promotion Foundation ‘Enriching and improving health promotion research’ seminar, 16 Oct 1996. Perth, Western Australia. 1996.
Windsor R, Baranowski T, Clark N, Cutter G. Evaluation of health promotion, health education and disease prevention programs. Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company; 1994.
Neuman L. Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.; 2011.
Young J. Breaking down boaders: overcoming research isolation to build global collaborations. National Drug Research Seminar Series, 27th June. Perth, Western Australia. 2013.
Graziano A, Raulin M. Research methods: a process of inquiry. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2012.
Gorman D, Huber C. The social construction of “evidence-based” drug prevention programs: A reanalysis of data from the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program. Eval Rev. 2009;33(4):396–414.
Gandhi A, Murphy-Graham E, Petrosino A, Chrismer S, Weiss C. The Devil is in the detail. Examining the evidence for ‘proven’ school-based drug abuse prevention programs. Eval Rev. 2007;31(1):43–74.
Pannucci C, Wilkins E. Identifing and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(2):619–25.
McBride N, Farringdon F, Meuleners L, Midford R. School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project. Intervention development and research procedures: Monograph 59. Perth: National Drug Research Institute; 2006.
McBride N, Farringdon F, Midford R, Meuleners L, Philip M. Harm minimisation in school drug education. Final results of the school health and alcohol harm reduction project (SHAHRP). Addiction. 2004;99:278–91.
McKay M, McBride N, Sumnall H, Cole J. Reducing the harm from adolescent alcohol consumption: results from an adapted version of SHAHRP in Northern Ireland. J Subst Use 2012; Early Online: 2012; 1–24.
Australian Government, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council. Australian code for the responsible conduct of research. Australian Government Printing Services: Canberra; 2007.
World Health Organisation. Standards and operational guidence for ethics review of health-related research with human participants. ISBN 978 924 150294 8. World Health Organisation: Geneva; 2011.
McBride N. School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project: Reducing Alcohol Related Harms in Young People. PhD thesis. National Drug Research Institute: Perth 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McBride, N. (2016). The Assessment Phase of the Intervention Research Framework: Study Design. In: Intervention Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1011-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1011-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1009-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1011-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)