Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Augmentative and Alternative Communication Applications for Persons with ASD and Complex Communication Needs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prelinguistic and Minimally Verbal Communicators on the Autism Spectrum

Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to the concepts of intentional and non-intentional communicative acts as they relate to the emergence of a learner’s attempts to influence others. In addition, critical terminologies related to these concepts are defined. Second, this chapter describes the variables involved in the implementation of augmentative communication systems that can greatly expand contexts for independent social interaction. Specifically, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is defined and specific types of AAC (i.e., aided and unaided) are described. Third, topics related to the selection of communicative mode(s), functions, and symbols to teach during the early stages of intervention are discussed. Fourth, the authors address whether implementing an augmentative communication system is likely to have a negative or positive effect on the probability of acquiring other communicative behavior, specifically vocal mode communication. Additionally, the authors discuss potential collateral gains that have been reported in learners who were taught to use augmentative communication systems. Fifth, the authors address instructional formats that are available to communication interventionists along with the need to consider overall intervention intensity and specific intervention parameters of dosage when selecting a format. Last, authors examine generalization of AAC responding and discuss strategies to enhance it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adkins, T., & Axelrod, S. (2001). Topography-based versus selection-based responding: Comparison of mand acquisition in each modality. The Behavior Analyst Today, 2, 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R., Avery, D. L., DiPietro, E. K., Edwards, G. L., & Christian, W. P. (1987). Intensive home-based early intervention with autistic children. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 352–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. (2012a). Optimal intervention intensity. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(5), 401–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. (2012b). Optimal intervention intensity in speech language pathology: Discoveries, challenges, and uncharted territories. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(5), 478–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. (1979). Intentions, conventions and symbols. In E. Bates, L. Benigni, I. Bretherton, L. Camaioni, & V. Volterra (Eds.), The emergence of symbols (pp. 69–140). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. R., Stoner, J. B., & Dennis, M. L. (2009). An investigation of aided language stimulation: Does it increase AAC use with adults with developmental disabilities and complex communication needs? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(1), 42–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. C., & Engelmann, S. (1978). Analysis of achievement data on six cohorts of low-income children from 20 school districts in the University of Oregon Direct Instruction Follow Through Model (Follow Through Project, Technical Report #78-1). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43. doi:10.1080/07434610600807470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbrauer, J. S., & Leach, D. J. (1993). The Murdoch Early Intervention Program after 2 years. Behavior Change, 10(2), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, M. C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., & Hsu, N. (2013). Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects of social-communicative skills and speech development. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 197–209. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.818059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9(3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvillian, J. D., & Nelson, K. E. (1976). Sign language acquisition in a mute autistic boy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 339–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, N. C. (2000). Improved comprehension of object names following voice output communication aid use: Two case studies. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandel, J., & Loeb, D. F. (2011). Program intensity and service delivery models in the schools: SLP survey results. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(4), 461–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, J., & Trembath, D. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(4), 300–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cafiero, J. (2001). The effect of an augmentative communication intervention on the communication behavior and academic progress of an adolescent with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(3), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calculator, S. (2002). Use of enhanced natural gestures to foster interactions between children with Angelman syndrome and their parents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 340–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M. (2003). Efficacy of behavioral interventions for reducing problem behavior in persons with autism: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 120–138. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(03)00014-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carnine, D. W., & Becker, W. C. (1982). Theory of instruction: Generalisation issues. Educational Psychology, 2(3-4), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D., Wilkinson, K. M., Blackman, D., & McIlvane, W. J. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 101–114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G. (1979). Teaching autistic children to use sign language: Some research issues. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 9, 345–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(2), 111–126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 sites, United States, 2008 (Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries, 61(SS03), pp. 1–19). Atlanta, GA: U.S, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadsey-Rusch, J., Drasgow, E., Reinoehl, B., Halle, J., & Collet-Klingenberg, L. (1993). Using general-case instruction to teach spontaneous and generalized requests for assistance to learners with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 18(3), 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, M., & Rehfeldt, R. (2003). Assessing the acquisition and generalization of two mand forms with adults with severe developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 265–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., & Reichle, J. (2013). Evaluating generalization and conditional use. A discussion of strategies. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K., Spetch, M. L., & Johnston, M. (1997). Spatial peak shift and generalization in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23(4), 469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2009). The effect of aided language stimulation on vocabulary acquisition in children with little or no functional speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(1), 50–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day, H. M., & Horner, R. H. (1986). Response variation and the generalization of a dressing skill: Comparison of single instance and general case instruction. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 7(2), 189–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drager, K. D., Light, J. C., Speltz, J. C., Fallon, K. A., & Jeffries, L. Z. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2 1/2-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(2), 298–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drager, K., Light, J., Currall, J., Muttiah, N., Smith, V., Kreis, D., Nilam-Hall, A., Parratt, D., Schuessler, K., Shermetta, K., & Wiscount, J. (2014, July). Just-in-time technology and visual scene displays: Adolescents with severe disabilities. Paper presented at the International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drager, K. D. R., Postal, V. J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in 2 preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112–125. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2006/012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, V. M. (1999). Functional communication training using assistive devices: Recruiting natural communities of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 247–267. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, V. M., & Merges, E. (2001). Functional communication training: A contemporary behavior analytic intervention for problem behaviors. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 110–119, 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyches, T. T. (1998). Effects of switch training on the communication of children with autism and severe disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 151–162. doi:10.1177/108835769801300303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikeseth, S., Smith, T., Jahr, E., & Eldevik, S. (2002). Intensive behavioral treatment at school for 4-7-year-old children with autism: A 1-year comparison controlled study. Behavior Modification, 26, 49–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eldevik, S., Hastings, R. P., Hughes, J. C., Jahr, E., Eikeseth, S., & Cross, S. (2009). Meta-analysis of early intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38, 439–450. doi:10.1080/15374410902851739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falcomata, T. S., Roane, H. S., Feeney, B. J., & Stephenson, K. M. (2010). Assessment and treatment of elopement maintained by access to stereotypy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 513–517.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, M. E., Yoder, P. J., Warren, S. F., & Bredin-Oja, S. L. (2013). Is more better? Milieu communication teaching in toddlers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(2), 679–693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) training manual (2nd ed.). Newark, NJ: DE: Pyramid Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B. (2014). Aided augmentative and alternative communication for people with ASD. In J. Matson (Series Ed.), Autism and child psychopathology series. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0814-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., Boles, M. B., Goodwyn, F. D., & Flores, M. M. (2014). Efficacy of handheld electronic visual supports to enhance vocabulary in children with ASD. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29, 3–12. doi:10.1177/108835761350491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Heath, A. K., Parker, R. I., Rispoli, M. J., & Duran, J. B. (2012). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 60–74. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1212-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., Goodwyn, F. D., Boles, M. B., Hong, E. R., Rispoli, M. J., Lund, E. M., et al. (2013). Impacts of PECS instructional coaching intervention on practitioners and children with autism. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 210–221. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.818058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., & Hong, E. R. (2014). AAC intervention mediated by natural communication partners. In J. B. Ganz (Ed.), Aided augmentative and alternative communication for people with ASD (pp. 77–93). In J. Matson (Series Ed.), Autism and child psychopathology series. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0814-1_6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., Hong, E. R., Gilliland, W., Morin, K., & Svenkerud, N. (2015). Comparison between visual scene displays and exchange-based communication in augmentative and alternative communication for children with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 11, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., Hong, E. R., & Goodwyn, F. D. (2013). Effectiveness of the PECS phase III app and choice between the app and traditional PECS among preschoolers with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 973–983. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., Rispoli, M. J., Mason, R. A., & Hong, E. R. (2014). Moderation of effects of AAC based on setting and types of aided AAC on outcome variables: An aggregate study of single-case research with individuals with ASD. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 184–192. doi:10.3109/17518423.2012.748097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., Simpson, R. L., & Lund, E. M. (2012). The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS): A promising method for improving communication skills of learners with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevarter, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Rojeski, L., Sammarco, N., Lang, R., Lancioni, G. E., et al. (2013). Comparisons of intervention components within augmentative and alternative communication systems for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4404–4414. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glogowska, M., Roulstone, S., Enderby, P., & Peters, T. J. (2000). Randomised controlled trial of community based speech and language therapy in preschool children. British Medical Journal, 321(7266), 923–926.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (2002). Communication intervention for children with autism: A review of treatment efficacy. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 32, 373–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens, C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with Cerebral Palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, C. G., & Golinkoff, R. M. (1979). The origins of intentional vocalizations in prelinguistic infants. Child Development, 50(1), 33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haring, N. G. (Ed.). (1988). Generalization for students with severe handicaps: Strategies and solutions. Washington, DC: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. D., & Reichle, J. (2004). The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13(2), 155–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. L., Handleman, J. S., Gordon, R., Kristoff, B., & Fuentes, F. (1991). Changes in cognitive and language functioning of preschool children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21, 281–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1992). American parenting of language-learning children: Persisting differences in family-child interactions observed in natural home environments. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1096–1105. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. K., Ganz, J. B., Parker, R., Burke, M., & Ninci, J. (2015). A meta-analytic review of functional communication training across mode of communication, age, and disability. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2(2), 155–166. doi:10.1007/s40489-014-0044-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4(3), 267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E. R., Ganz, J. B., Gilliland, W., & Ninci, J. (2014). Teaching caregivers to implement an augmentative and alternative communication intervention to an adult with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 570–580. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., & Albin, R. W. (1988). Research on general-case procedures for learners with severe disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 11(4), 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., Bellamy, G. T., & Colvin, G. T. (1984). Responding in the presence of nontrained stimuli: Implications of generalization error patterns. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9(4), 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., & Day, H. M. (1991). The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 719–732.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., Jones, D. N., & Williams, J. A. (1985). A functional approach to teaching generalized street crossing. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., Williams, J. A., & Stevely, J. D. (1987). Acquisition of generalized telephone use by students with moderate and severe disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 229–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. S., Sparkman, C. R., Cohen, H. G., Green, G., & Stanislaw, H. (2005). A comparison of intensive behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 359–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howlin, P., Magiati, I., & Charman, T. (2009). Systematic review of early intensive behavioral interventions for children with autism. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, 23–41. doi:10.1352/2009.114:23-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyppa Martin, J., Reichle, J., Dimian, A., & Chen, M. (2013). Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44(4), 327–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, S., Reichle, J., Feeley, K., & Jones, E. (2012). Augmentative and alternative communication strategies for individuals with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. A., & Bailey-Orr, M. (2012). Using AAC to support language comprehension. In S. S. Johnston, J. Reichle, K. M. Feeley, & E. A. Jones (Eds.), AAC strategies for individuals with moderate to severe disabilities (pp. 311–345). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, A., Kristoffersson, L., Ferm, U., & Thunberg, G. (2011). The ComAlong communication boards: Parents’ use and experiences of aided language stimulation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 103–116. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.580780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, L. M., & Konrad, M. (2009). Teaching students with intellectual or developmental disabilities to write: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(1), 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., … Sigafoos, J. (2013). Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay-Raining Bird, E., Lamond, E., & Holden, J. (2012). Survey of bilingualism in autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47, 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kee, S. B., Casey, L. B., Cea, C. R., Bicard, D. F., & Bicard, S. E. (2012). Increasing communication skills: A case study of a man with autism spectrum disorder and vision loss. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106, 120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. M., & Fahsl, A. J. (2012). Supporting social competence in children who use augmentative and alternative communication. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45, 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantareas, M. M., Hunter, D., & Sloman, L. (1982). Training a blind autistic child to communicate through signs. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 12, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Cuvo, A. J., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., & Didden, R. (2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2006.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Light, J. (1997). “Let’s go star fishing”: Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, J., Drager, K., McCarthy, J., Mellott, S., Parrish, C., Parsons, A., … Welliver, M. (2004). Performance of typically developing four and five year old children with AAC systems using different language organization techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, J. C., Roberts, B., Dimarco, R., & Greiner, N. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 153–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, N. B., Mulley, G. P., Jones, A. C., McGuirk, E., Lendrem, W., & Mitchell, J. R. A. (1984). Effectiveness of speech therapy for aphasic stroke patients: A randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 323(8388), 1197–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I., & Schreibman, L. (1971). Stimulus overselectivity of autistic children in a two stimulus situation. Behavior Research and Therapy, 9, 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, S. K., & Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II-communicative interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 1–15. doi:10.1080/07434610600720442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. H., Reichle, J., Dimian, A., & Chen, M. (2013). Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 327–336. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0108).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinty, A. S., Breit-Smith, A., Fan, X., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2011). Does intensity matter? Preschoolers’ print knowledge development within a classroom-based intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(3), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, L., & Reed, P. (2007). Age trends in stimulus overselectivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 369–380.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McLay, L., van der Meer, L., Schäfer, M. C. M., Couper, L., McKenzie, E., O’Reilly, M. F., … Sutherland, D. (2015). Comparing acquisition, generalization, maintenance, and preference across three AAC options in four children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27, 323–339. doi:10.1007/s10882-014-9417-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, J. E., McLean, L. K., Brady, N. C., & Etter, R. (1991). Communication profiles of two types of gesture using nonverbal persons with severe to profound mental retardation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34(2), 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillian, J. M. (2008). Teachers make it happen: From professional development to integration of augmentative and alternative communication technologies in the classroom. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 32, 199–211. doi:10.1080/10300110802047467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.784930.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, D., Light, J., & Schlosser, R. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: Manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirenda, P., & Iacono, T. (2009). Autism spectrum disorders and AAC. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, L. C., Ganz, J. B., & Crittenden, J. (2013). Use of an iPad play story to increase play dialog of preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 2174–2189. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1770-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, D., & Hanline, M. F. (2007). Enhancing the alternative and augmentative communication use of a child with autism through a parent implemented naturalistic intervention. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54, 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, R. E., & Sweetland-Baker, M. (2001). Brief report: An assessment of stimulus generalization and contingency effects in functional communication training with two students with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 31, 235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogletree, B. T., Davis, P., Hambrecht, G., & Phillips, E. W. (2012). Using milieu training to promote photograph exchange for a young child with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27, 93–101. doi:10.1177/1088357612441968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, G., Ivancic, M., Edwards, G., Iwata, B., & Page, T. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforce value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249–255.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H., Alber-Morgan, S., & Cannella-Malone, H. (2011). Effects of mother-implemented Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) training on independent communicative behaviors of young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker-McGowan, Q., Chen, M., Reichle, J., Pandit, S., Johnson, L., & Kreibich, S. (2014). Describing treatment intensity in milieu teaching interventions for children with developmental disabilities: A review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(4), 351–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. M., Marinova-Todd, S. H., & Mirenda, P. (2012). Brief report: An exploratory study of lexical skills in bilingual children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1499–1503. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1366-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., & Brady, N. C. (2012). Teaching pragmatic skills to individuals with severe disabilities. In S. Johnston, J. Reichle, K. M. Feeley, & E. A. Jones (Eds.), AAC strategies for individuals with moderate to severe disabilities (pp. 3–23). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., & Drager, K. D. (2010). Examining issues of aided communication display and navigational strategies for young children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22(3), 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., Drager, K., & Davis, C. (2002). Using requests for assistance to obtain desired items and to gain release from nonpreferred activities: Implications for assessment and intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., & McComas, J. (2004). Conditional use of a request for assistance. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1255–1262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., Rogers, N., & Barrett, C. (1984). Establishing pragmatic discriminations among the communicative functions of requesting, rejecting, and commenting in an adolescent. Journal for the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., & Wacker, D. (2015). Functional communication training. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, B., & Clarke, S. (1983). Acquisition of expressive signing by autistic children: An evaluation of the relative effects of simultaneous communication and sign-alone training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 315–328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rincover, A., & Ducharme, J. M. (1987). Variables influencing stimulus overselectivity and “tunnel vision” in developmentally delayed children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 91, 422–430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romanczyk, R. G., Lockshin, S., & Matey, L. (2001). The children’s unit for treatment and evaluation. In J. S. Handleman & S. L. Harris (Eds.), Preschool education programs for children with autism (pp. 49–94). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (1993). Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9(4), 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 3, 363–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (2005). Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants and Young Children, 18, 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Pate, J. L. (1988). Establishment of symbolic communication in persons with severe mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 94–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rotholz, D. A., Berkowitz, S. F., & Burberry, J. (1989). Functionality of two modes of communication in the community by students with developmental disabilities: A comparison of signing and communication books. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreibman, L., Dawson, G., Stahmer, A. C., Landa, R., Rogers, S. J., McGee, G. G., … Halladay, A. (2015). Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: Empirically validated treatments for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 2411–2428. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2407-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Serna, R. W., Jeffery, J. A., & Stoddard, L. T. (1998). Blank-comparison assessment of stimulus-stimulus relations in individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 60–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seung, H., Siddiqi, S., & Elder, J. H. (2006). Intervention outcomes of a bilingual child with autism. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, H. C., Abramson, J. S., Corley, K., Fadie, H., Flynn, S., Laubscher, E., … Sorce, J. (2015). Enhancing communication for individuals with autism: A guide to the visual immersion system. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, H. C., Blackstone, S., Vanderheiden, G., Williams, M., & DeRuyter, F. (2012). Using AAC technology to access the world. Assistive Technology, 24(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, S., & Wetherby, A. M. (2009). Communicative acts of children with autism spectrum disorders in the second year of life. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1139–1156. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0280).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J., & Drasgow, E. (2001). Conditional use of aided and unaided AAC: A review and clinical case demonstration. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(3), 152–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M. F., Seely-York, S., Weru, J., Son, S. H., Green, V. A., et al. (2004). Transferring AAC intervention to the home. Disability & Rehabilitation, 26, 1330–1334. doi:10.1080/09638280412331280361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T., Groen, A. D., & Wynn, J. W. (2000). Randomized trial of intensive early intervention for children with pervasive developmental disorder. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105(269), 285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, S., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. E. (2006). Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 389–395. doi:10.1080/13638490500519984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, J. R., & Horner, R. H. (1984). The effects of single instance, multiple instance, and general case training on generalized vending machine use by moderately and severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17(2), 273–278.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steere, D. E., Strauch, J. D., Powell, T. H., & Butterworth, J. (1990). Promoting generalization from a teaching setting to a community-based setting among persons with severe disabilities: A general case programming approach. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, J. V., Cameron, M. J., Dorsey, M. F., & Fleming, E. (2004). Task analysis, correspondence training, and general case instruction for teaching personal hygiene skills. Behavioral Interventions, 19(2), 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tincani, M. (2004). Comparing the Picture Exchange Communication System and sign language training for children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trottier, N., Kamp, L., & Mirenda, P. (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 27, 26–39. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.546810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, L. A., Dofny, E. M., & Dutka, S. (1994). Effect of strategy and attribution training on strategy maintenance and transfer. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 445–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valicenti-McDermott, M., Tarshis, N., Schouls, M., Galdston, M., Hottinger, K., Seijo, R., … Shinnar, S. (2013). Language differences between monolingual English and bilingual English-Spanish young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Neurology, 28, 945–948. doi:10.1177/0883073812453204.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, L., Didden, R., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Comparing three augmentative and alternative communication modes for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24, 451–468. doi:10.1007/s10882-012-9283-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1247–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkert, V. M., Lerman, D. C., Call, N. A., & Trosclair-Lasserre, N. (2009). An evaluation of resurgence during treatment with functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 145–160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, D., Lee, J., Padilla Dalmau, Y., Kopelman, T., Lindgren, S., Kuhle, J., … Waldron, D. (2013). Conducting functional communication training via telehealth to reduce the problem behavior of young children with autism. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 25, 35–48. doi:10.1007/s10882-012-9314-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, V. L., & Snell, M. E. (2013). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on challenging behavior: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 117–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. F., Fey, M. E., & Yoder, P. J. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(1), 70–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westling, D., & Fox, L. (2009). Teaching students with severe disabilities (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, A. M., & Prizant, B. M. (1993). Profiling communication and symbolic abilities in young children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 15(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, A., & Prizant, B. (1989a). The expression of communicative intent: Assessment guidelines. Seminars in Speech and Language, 10, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, A., & Prizant, B. (1989b). The expression of communicative intent: Assessment guidelines. Seminars in Speech and Language, 10, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, A., & Prutting, C. (1984). Profiles of communicative and cognitive-social abilities in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 364–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherby, A., Reichle, J., & Pierce, P. (1998). The transition to symbolic communication. In A. Wetherby, S. Warren, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Transitions in prelinguistic communication (Vol. 7, pp. 197–230). Baltimore: Paul H Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, H., & Lovaas, O. I. (1976). Stimulus overselectivity: A common feature in autism and mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81, 26–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L., Lasker, J., Siegel-Causey, E., Beukelman, D., & Ball, L. (1998). Input framework for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(4), 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worley, J. A., & Matson, J. L. (2012). Comparing symptoms of autism spectrum disorders using the current “DSM-IV-TR” diagnostic criteria and the proposed “DSM-V” diagnostic criteria. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 965–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Mirenda, P., Wang, H., & Chen, M. (2010). Assessment and treatment of stereotypic vocalizations in a Taiwanese adolescent with autism: A case study. International Journal of Special Education, 25, 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeaton, W. H., & Sechrest, L. (1981). Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(2), 156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, USA

    Joe Reichle & Quannah Parker-McGowan

  2. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Jennifer Ganz

  3. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Kathryn Drager

Authors
  1. Joe Reichle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer Ganz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kathryn Drager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Quannah Parker-McGowan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Reichle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Schl of Educational and Profess Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Deb Keen

  2. Department of Special Education, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, USA

    Hedda Meadan

  3. University of Kansas, Department of Speech Language Hearing Sc, Lawrence, Kansas, USA

    Nancy C. Brady

  4. Department of Special Education, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, USA

    James W. Halle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reichle, J., Ganz, J., Drager, K., Parker-McGowan, Q. (2016). Augmentative and Alternative Communication Applications for Persons with ASD and Complex Communication Needs. In: Keen, D., Meadan, H., Brady, N., Halle, J. (eds) Prelinguistic and Minimally Verbal Communicators on the Autism Spectrum. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0713-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation