Skip to main content

Dialectical Creativity: Sketch-Negate-Create

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity

Abstract

Dialectical Creativity is the act of formulating a new concept through the original idea (the thesis), developing opposing contradictory ideas (the antithesis), and culminating on a more developed concretized idea that both negates and encompasses both the thesis and the antithesis (the synthesis). Sketching is a fundamental part of ideation. The act of performing ideation with an inherently abstract hand-drawn sketch, complete with messiness, allows the sketcher, through the misinterpretation of their own strokes, to evoke antithetical concepts, enabling the sketcher to quickly develop a creative synthetic idea. In the dialectical process there is a constant tension between creative change and the natural tendency to seek stability. Sketch recognition is the automated understanding of hand drawn diagrams by a computer, and can be used to both enhance creativity and/or idea stability. This paper discusses the Sketch Dialectic and its impact on the field of sketch recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarado C, Davis R (2001). Resolving ambiguities to create a natural computer-based sketching environment. In Proc. of IJCAI ’01, pp 1365–1371

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper BMA (1997). Plato: complete works. Hackett, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  3. David J, Eoff B, Hammond T (2010) CoSke: An Exploration in Collaborative Sketching. Posters at the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Savannah, Georgia, February 6–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deleuze G (1986) Foucault. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deleuze G, Guattari F (1987) A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dennis AR, Williams ML (2003) Electronic brainstorming: theory, research, and future directions. In: Paulus P (ed) Group creativity. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dixon D, Prasad M, Hammond T (2010) iCanDraw? using sketch recognition and corrective feedback to assist a user in drawing human faces. In Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction (CHI 2010), ACM Press, Atlanta, Georgia. April 10-17:2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards B (1998) Drawing on the right side of the brain. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 139–140

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards B (1999) The new drawing on the right side of the brain. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fox M (2005) The accessible Hegel. Prometheus, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  11. Furnham A, Yazdanpanahi T (1995) Personality differences and group versus individual brainstorming. Personality Individ Differ 19:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gross M (1996) The electronic cocktail napkin: a computational environment for working with design diagrams. Des Stud 17(1):53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hammond T, Davis R (2002) Tahuti: a geometrical sketch recognition system for uml class diagrams. AAAI Symposium on Sketch Understanding (AAAI 2002), San Francisco, CA. July 28–August 1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hammond T, Davis R (2004) Automatically transforming symbolic shape descriptions for use in sketch recognition, The Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-04)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammond T, Gajos K, Davis R, Shrobe H (2002) An agent-based system for capturing and indexing software design meetings. Workshop on Agents in Design, August 28

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hegel GWF (1977) The phenomenology of the spirit, [Trans. A.V.Miller]. Claredon, Gloucestershire

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horn R (1998) Visual language: global communication for the 21st century. MacroVU, Bainbridge Island

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Des Stud 12(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LaViola Jr. JJ, Zeleznik RC (2004) MathPad2: a system for the creation and exploration of mathematical sketches. ACM Trans Graphics 23(3):432–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oh Y, Do EY-L (2004) Intelligent critiquing of design sketches. In: AAAl Fall Symposium, Making Pen-Based Interaction Intelligent and Natural. AAAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oltmans M, Davis R (2001) Naturally conveyed explanations of device behavior. In Proceedings of PUI ’01, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roediger HL, Karpicke JD (2006) The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Association Psychol Sci 1(3):181–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rose A (2005) Graphical communication using hand-drawn sketches in civil engineering. J Profess Issues Eng Educ Pract. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:4(238)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saund E, Mahoney J, Fleet D, Larner D, Lank E (2002) Perceptual organization as a foundation for intelligent sketch editing. In Sketch Understanding, Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, pp 118–125

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shah J, Vargas-Hernandez N, Smith S (2003) Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 111–134

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shum S, MacLean A, Bellotti V, Hammond N (1996) Graphical argumentation and design cognition. Hum Computer Interact 12(3):267–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tversky T (2002) What do sketches say about thinking? Sketch understanding, Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, pp 148–151,March 25–27 2002

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yan B, Arlin P (1999) Dialectical thinking: implications for creativethinking. In: Runco M, Pritzker S (eds) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 551–555

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the DARPA Computer Science Study Panel. Much of the work described above was performed in collaboration with past and current graduate and undergraduate student members of the Sketch Recognition Lab at Texas A&M University, with a special shout out going to Daniel Dixon, Manoj Prasad, Jessica David, and Nic Lupfer. Additionally, thanks to Jennifer Mease, Christopher Swift, Stace Treat, Christopher Zebo, Tobias Tolland, and Kerre Cole for their help formulating the concept of Dialectic Creativity and the Sketch Dialectic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy Hammond .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hammond, T. (2015). Dialectical Creativity: Sketch-Negate-Create. In: Gero, J. (eds) Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9296-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9297-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics