Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 11))

Abstract

The use of both evaluation and accountability in education systems has been of long standing, although the ways in which they are used have changed markedly over the past century. Where schools and universities are run as private, fee paying organisations, the clients, who are the students and their parents, must make their own judgments of the effectiveness and value of the education provided. However, where schools and universities are paid for out of public funds the need arises to evaluate and account for the spending of public monies. With the expansion across the world of the education systems in each country, province and municipality, the call for evaluation and accountability of those systems has increased, because of the substantial and rising expenditures involved. Over the past 100 years, not only has the size of the school-aged population grown markedly, but the demand has also grown, initially for universal primary education, subsequently for widespread secondary and technical education, and more recently for greatly increased provision of higher education and training in technology and commerce. The costs of providing these services are substantial and often relatively larger in those countries that can least afford to provide such services, but have the greatest need. This article considers the nature of both evaluation and accountability and examines how they are practised and developed in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aikin, W. M. (1942). Adventure in American Education, Volume 1, The Story of the Eight-Year Study. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amara Sawadisevee, Abu Bakar Nordin & Jiyono (1982). Six educational evaluation projects in South East Asia. Evaluation in Education, 6 (1), 1–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1, Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. University of California Comment, 1(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Hastings, T. J., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook of Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1997a). Monitoring effectiveness: Conceptual and practical possibilities and dilemmas in developing a framework. In Meng Hong Wei et al. (1997), School Based Indicators of Effectiveness: Experiences and Practice (pp. 179–206 ). Guilin, China: Guangxi Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y. C. (1997b). A framework of indicators of education quality in Hong Kong primary schools: Development and application. In Meng Hong Wei et al. (1997), School Based Indicators of Effectiveness: Experiences and Practices (pp. 207–249 ). Guilin, China: Guangxi Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubberley, E. P. (1917). Editor’s introduction. In W. S. Munroe (1924), Educational Tests and Measurements (pp. xi—xv). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, W. E. (1872). Payment by Results in Primary Education. Melbourne: Stellwell and Knight. Keeves, J. P. (1994). National Examinations: Design, Procedures and Reporting. Paris: UNESCO, IIEP. Keeves, J. P. ( 1999 ). Research into curriculum change. In J. P. Keeves & K. Marjoribanks (Eds.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education: Review of Research (pp. 113–144). Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. (1975). Evaluation of the mastery learning project in Korea. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1 (1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook 2, Affective Domain. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madaus, G. F., & Kallaghan, T. (1992). Curriculum evaluation and assessment. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.) (1992), Handbook of Research in Curriculum (pp. 119–154 ). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing Objectives for Programmed Instruction. San Francisco: Fearon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng Hong Wei, Zhou Yigun & Fang Yihua (1997). School Based Indicators of Effectiveness: Experiences and Practices. Guilin, China: Guangxi Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Kamens, D. H., & Benavot, A. with Yun-Kyung Cha and Suk-Ying Wong (1992). School Knowledge for the Masses. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, W. S. (1917). Educational Tests and Measurements. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Evaluation and Accountability in Asian and Pacific Countries 121

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1985). Accountability in education. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 19–29 ). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (1997). Developing indicators on the performance of education systems in an international context: The OECD education indicators. In Meng Hong Wei et al. (1997), School Based Indicators of Effectiveness: Experiences and Practices (pp. 251–264 ). Guilin, China: Guangxi Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1918). The nature, purposes and general methods of measurements of educational products. In G. M. Whipple (Ed.), The Measurement of Educational Products (17th NSSE Yearbook) IL (pp. 16–24 ). Bloomington: Public School Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (1973). Testing for accountability. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed.), Accountability for Teachers and School Administrators. Belmont, CA: Fearon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. W. (1986). Changing concepts of educational evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research, 10 (1), 1–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mohandas, R., Wei, M.H., Keeves, J.P. (2003). Evaluation and Accountability in Asian and Pacific Countries. In: Keeves, J.P., et al. International Handbook of Educational Research in the Asia-Pacific Region. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3368-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3368-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6167-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3368-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics