Skip to main content

Metaphor and the Folk Understanding of Anger

  • Chapter
Everyday Conceptions of Emotion

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 81))

Abstract

The issue I wish to address in this paper is this: What is the role of metaphor in the naive or folk understanding of anger? This is an interesting theoretical question in itself because it raises the more general issue of the nature of the relationship between metaphor and culture. The issue has also become a topical one in recent years. Quinn (1991) suggested that, contrary to a claim made by Lakoff and Kövecses (1987), metaphor simply reflects culture. Quinn (1991:60) writes: “I will be arguing that metaphors, far from constituting understanding, are ordinarily selected to fit a preexisting and culturally shared model.” In contrast, Lakoff and Kövecses claimed that metaphors largely constitute the naive understanding of anger, as based on their study of American English. Thus, we have two diametrically opposed views here: in one, metaphor reflects cultural models and in the other, metaphor constitutes cultural models. I will try to show that neither of these views is fully adequate to explain the relationship in the case of anger, and that a compromise view is both possible and necessary. To demonstrate the feasibility of such a composite compromise view, I will continue to use the concept of anger as an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doi, T. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Levenson, R. W., & Friesen, W.V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. Science, 221, 1208–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1991). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. Preprints of the Katholieke Universitait Leuven, Belgium, preprint nr. 133(1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and rea.son. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, .

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. (1989). The conceptual structure of emotional experience in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (1991a). A linguist’s quest for love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kövecses, Z. (1991b). Happiness: A definitional effort. Journal ofMetaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Kövecses Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds) Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L L, Friesen, W. V., & Ekman, P. (1991). Emotion, physiology, and expression in old age. Psychology and Aging, 6, 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). Voluntary facial action generates emotion-specific autonomic nervous system activity. Psychophysiology, 27, 363–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, R. W., Ekman, P., Heider, K., & Friesen, W. V. (1992). Emotion and autonomic nervous system activity in the Minangkabau of West Sumatra. Journal of Personality and Social P.sychology, 62, 972–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, R. I. (1973). Tahitians. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, C. (1987). Goals, events, and understanding in Ifaluk emotion theory. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 290–312). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural emotions. Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and their challenge to Western theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuki, K. (1989). Metaphors of anger in Japanese. Paper presented at the symposium Cognitive Grammar and Related Topics, LSA, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, P. (1991). ANGER IS HEAT: Some data for a crosslinguistic survey. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Linguistics, UC, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning Yu. (1993). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Uunpublished manuscript, Program in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, N. (1991). The cultural basis of metaphor. In J. Fernandez (Ed), Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 56–93). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reischauer, E. O. (1964). Japan: Past and pra.sent (3rd edition)., New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. (1984). Getting angry. The Jamesian theory of emotion in anthropology. In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds), Culture theory (pp. 238–254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kövecses, Z. (1995). Metaphor and the Folk Understanding of Anger. In: Russell, J.A., Fernández-Dols, JM., Manstead, A.S.R., Wellenkamp, J.C. (eds) Everyday Conceptions of Emotion. NATO ASI Series, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8484-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8484-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4551-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8484-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics