Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 69))

Abstract

For the past few years, Mark Johnson and I have been exploring early infant preferences for looking at faces and face-like stimuli (Morton and Johnson, 1991). At the time we started this work, the dominant experimental methodology was the infant control procedure. Maurer (1985) considered this technique to be more sensitive than the preference techniques used by other workers. Earlier, she had found that two-month olds looked significantly longer at a schematic face than control stimuli but failed to demonstrate any such preference with one-month old infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, J., Braddick, O. and French, J. (1979). Contrast sensitivity of the human neonate measured by the visually evoked potential. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 18, 210–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. S. and Ginsberg, A. P. (1985). Infant visual preferences: a review and new theoretical treatment. In H. W. Reese (ed), Advances in child development and behaviour (Vol. 19) (New York: Academic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. S. and Salapatek, P. (1981). Infant pattern vision: A new approach based on the contrast sensitivity function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushneil, I. W. R., Sai, F. and Mullin, J. T. (1989). Neonatal recognition of the mother’s face. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (1976). Habituation of infant visual attention. In T. Tighne and G. Leeton (eds), Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior, and neurophysiology. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goren, C. C., Sarty, M. and Wu, P. Y. K. (1975). Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics, 56, 544–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H. (1990). Information processing and storage during filial imprinting. In P. G. Hepper (ed) Kin Recognition (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H., Bolhuis, J. J. and Horn, G. (1985). Interaction between acquired preferences and developing predispositions during imprinting. Animal Behaviour, 33, 1000–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Bartrip, J. and Morton, J. (1992). The effects of movement of internal features on infants’ preferences for face-like stimuli. Infant Behaviour and Development, 15, 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H. D., and Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H. and Horn, G. (1986). Dissociation of recognition memory and associative learning by a restricted lesion of the chick forebrain. Neuropsychologia, 24, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H. and Horn, G. (1988). Development of filial preferences in dark-reared chicks. Animal Behavior, 36, 675–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H. and Morton, J. (1991). Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, K. A. (1987). Amplitude and phase spectra as indices of infant’s pattern preferences. Infant Behaviour and Development, 10, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner, K. A. and Banks, M. S. (1987). Stimulus energy does not account for 2-month-old preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 594–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, D. (1985). Infants’ Perception of Facedness. In Field, T. N. and Fox, N. (eds). Social Perception in Infants, (New Jersey: Ablex).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, D. and Barrera, M. (1981). Infants’ perception of natural and distorted arrangements of a schematic face. Child Development, 47, 523–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. and Johnson, M. H. (1991). Conspec and Conlern: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., Johnson, M. H. and Maurer, D. (1990). On the reasons for newborns responses to faces. Infant Behavior and Development, 13, 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morton, J. (1993). Mechanisms in Infant Face Processing. In: de Boysson-Bardies, B., de Schonen, S., Jusczyk, P., McNeilage, P., Morton, J. (eds) Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life. NATO ASI Series, vol 69. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8234-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8234-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4251-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8234-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics