Skip to main content

Notes on Clause Structure

  • Chapter
Elements of Grammar

Part of the book series: Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics ((KIHL))

Abstract

The present article will review, and elaborate upon, some of the many recent proposals concerning sentential functional projections, verb incorporation and “checking theory” (see Chomsky 1992) that have been published or circulated in recent years. In particular an effort will be made to identify the various functional projections distinguished under the so-called “Split Inflection Hypothesis” (henceforth SIH) in English and French and develop a theory of what it is that makes them [±strong] or [±opaque], in the terminology of Pollock (1989), Chomsky (1989) and Chomsky (1992).

This article was written in 1992. I had planned to revise it for publication in this volume by including comments on, and alternatives to, the relevant literature published between 1987 and 1995. (Un)fortunately the amount of work on clause structure and functional projections done over the last five years is so staggering that it has forced me to take a more realistic view of what ground I could cover in an introductory article. I have therefore pretty much stuck to the original text. Had I tried to integrate the more recent forward in Chomsky (1995: chapter 4) I would have had to rewrite the article entirely and the points it does make would have been lost. For some suggestions see Pollock (1997, Chapter 13). The text of this article is based on may notes for a class on funtional structure I taught in Montreal in June and July 1991 and Seouls, Korea, in July 1991. I would like to thank all the participants of the UQAM seminar, in particular Monique Lemieux, and all the participants of the Seoull summer school, in particular professor Dong-Whee Yang and the two other guest speakers, Kyle Johnson and Ian Roberts. Naturally, the usual disclaimers about the responsibility of the persons cited hold of the present work. Finally I would like to dedicate this article to the memory of C. L. Baker: the great respect in which I hold his work should not be masked by the disagreement I voice here with some of his views on the functional structure of English sentences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bak, Jung-Sup (1990) Accord Casuel et sujets multiples en coreén, unpublished thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. L. (1991) ‘The syntax of English not: The limits of core grammar’, LI 22(3), 387–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (1988) Incorporation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battistella, E. and A. Lobeck (1991) ‘On verb fronting, inflection movement and aux support’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics, revue candienne de linguistique 36(3), 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, A. (1990) Generalized Verb Movement. Rosenberg & Sellier, Torino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H. (1993) ‘The ups and downs of Hebrew berb movement’. Unpublished article, UMass Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. (1991) ‘Tense and agreement in different tenses’. The Linguistic Review 8, 159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1955) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures, Mouton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986), Barriers, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1989) ‘Some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, MIT working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 10, 43–75 (also in Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar (Freidin (ed), MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1992) ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 1, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program, MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, A.-M. and E. Williams (1987) On the Definition of Word, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emonds, J. (1978) ‘The verbal complex V’ -V in French’, LI 9, 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, M. (1991) ‘On the absence of present tense in English’, unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassi-Fehri, A. (forthcoming) ‘Temporal reference, finiteness, and the inflectional structure of S in Arabic’, to appear as a (revised) chapter in (interim title) Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses, Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeze, R. (1992) ‘Existentials and other locatives’. Language 68, 553–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, L. and R. Zanuttini (1991) ‘Negative heads and the Neg criterion’, The Linguistic Review 8, 233–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. (1985) ‘On semantics’, LI 16, 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschbühler, P. and M. Labelle (1994) ‘Changes in verb position in French negative infinitival clauses’. Language Variation and Change 6, 149–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, T. R. (1969) ‘La transformation de remplacement du constituant “passé” et ses rapports avec le système modal de l’ anglais’, in Languages 14, 28–43. Larousse, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, A. (1991) ‘The structure of INFL and the finite clause in Finnish’, unpublishedpaper. University of Upsala, Sueden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Yong-Tcheol (1992) Théorie de l’ incorporation et théorie du cas: leurs implications sur la structure phrastique de la structure du groupe nominal en coréen, unpublished thesede doctorat. Université de Paris VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulk, A. and A. van Kemenade (1993) ‘Subjects, nominative case, agreement and functional heads’, Lingua 89, 181–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, S. (1990) ‘About AGR(P)’, in LI 21(4), 551–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (1991) ‘Object Positions’, NNLT 9, 577–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (1992) ‘On the typology of the V+Adverb+NP word order’, unpublished article. University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1984) Connectedness and Binary Brancing, Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1985) ‘L’ accord du participe passé en français et en italien’. Modèles Linguistiques VII, 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1987) ‘Null subjects and clitic climbing’, in: O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.). The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1989) ‘Notes on English Agreement’, CIEFL Bulletin 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1992) ‘Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection’, unpublished article, the Graduate Center, CUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Y. (1986) Subjects in Japanese and English, unpublished dissertation, UMass, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, A. (1990) ‘Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change’, Journal of Language Variation and Change 1(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laka, I. (1990) Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections,unpublished MIT Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonzi, L. (1991) ‘Which adverbs in Spec VP?’, Rivista di grammatica Generativa 15,141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, F. (1993) ‘Movement of negative adverbs in French infinitival clauses’, unpublished article, University of Ottawa, to appear in Journal of French Language Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, Tomita. M. (1992) ‘From Infl features to V movement: The subjunctive in English’, unpublished MA thesis, University of Hawaii at Manoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouhalla, J. (1990) ‘Sentential negation, relativised minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliarioes’. The Linguistic Review 7(2), 183–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D. (1989) ‘Language-particular processes and the earliness principle’, unpublished article, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.-Y. (1989) ‘Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP’, LI 20(3), 365–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.-Y. (1992) ‘A review of A. Belletti’ s generalized verb movement’, Language 68(4), 836–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.-Y. (1994) ‘Checking theory and bare verbs’, in: Paths Towards Universal Grammar, studies in honor of Richard Kayne, Cinque et al. (eds.), Georgetown UniversityPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.-Y. (1996) ‘Case checking and particle constructions’, unpublished article, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.-Y. (1997) Langage et cognition, introduction au programme minimaliste de la grammaire generative, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potsma, G. (1993) ‘The syntax of the morphological defectivity of be’, unpublished article. University of Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, M. L. (1990) ‘Adverb incorporation and the syntax of adverbs in modern Greek’, unpublished paper, University of Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, M. L. (1994) ‘Clause structure and V-Movement in the languages of the Balkans’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1(1), 63–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, M. L. (forthcoming) ‘Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian yes-no questions: Vo-raising to -li vs Li-Hopping’, to appear in LI 24(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. (1985) ‘Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries’, NLLT 3, 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I. (1993) Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (1982) The Syntax of Words, LI Monograph 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speas, M. (1991) ‘Inflectional heads and inflectional morphemes’, The Linguistic Review 8, 389–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, E. C. (1972) A History of English Syntax, New York, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. (1984) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, unpublished MIT Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1981) ‘On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”, LI 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttini, R. (1991), Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A Comparative Study in Romance Languages, unpublished dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Liliane Haegeman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pollock, JY. (1997). Notes on Clause Structure. In: Haegeman, L. (eds) Elements of Grammar. Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4298-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5420-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics