Abstract
In the Principles and Parameters theory representational conditions on various levels carried most of the burden of restricting syntax. In the minimalist framework representational conditions will only hold at interface levels, the only levels that exist. Let us assume the strong version of the minimalist hypothesis according to which syntactic interface conditions are “bare output conditions”, that is conditions forced on syntax by the interpretive systems that are fed by the syntactic computations. Suppose furthermore that most of the effects of representational conditions of the Principles and Parameters theory turn out to be the effects of either bare output conditions or of conditions holding within the syntax-external systems. If so, then we may expect the syntactic computation, whose task is to assemble interface representations from a set of lexical items, to be near-trivial.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boskovic, Zeljko (1994) ‘Selection and the categorial status of infinitival complements’, NLLT.
Brody, Michael (1990) ‘Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian’, UCLWP 2, University College, London.
Brody, Michael (1993a) Lexico-Logical Form. Ms., University College, London.
Brody, Michael (1993b) ‘Theta theory and arguments’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 1–23.
Brody, Michael (1994) ‘Dependence and phrase structure’, UCLWP 6, University College, London.
Brody, Michael (1995a) Lexico-Logical Form. A Radically Minimalist Theory. MIT Press,Cambridge, Mass.
Cambridge, Mass. Brody, Michael (1995b) Phrase Structure and Projection. Ms., University College, London, to appear in Linguistic Inquiry.
Brody, Michael (1995c) ‘Hungarian focus and bare checking theory’, in Arheitspapiere des Sonderforschungshereichs 340, University of Tubingen.
Chierchia, G. (1991) ‘Functional wh and weak crossover’, The Proceedings of the WCCFL 10. Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford, pp. 75–90.
Chomsky, Noam (1986) Barriers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, Noam (1993) ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, Noam (1994) Bare Phrase Structure, ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Chomsky, Noam (1995) ‘Chapter 4’. ms., MIT.
Cinque, Guglielmo (1991) Types of A’-dependencies. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Cinque, Guglielmo (1995) ‘Adverbs and the universal hierarchy of functional projections’, Tromso GLOW abstract.
Hornstein, Norbert (1994) LF: The Grammar of Logical Form. From GB to Minimalism. Ms., University of Maryland.
Jaeggli, Osvaldo (1981) Topics in Romance Syntax. Foris, Dordrecht.
Johnson, Kyle (1991) ‘Object positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 577–636.
Kawashima, R and Hisatsugu Kitahara (1995) ‘Strict cyclicity, linear ordering and derivational c-command’, to appear in WCCFL 14.
Kayne, Richard (1981) ‘ECP extensions’, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 93–133.
Kayne, Richard (1983) ‘Connectedness’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 223–249.
Kayne, Richard (1995) The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Koizumi, Masatoshi (1993) ‘Object Agreement Phrases and the Split VP Hypothesis’, MITWPL 18. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Lasnik, Howard (1994) Antecedent contained deletion and/or pseudo-gapping. Talk, presented at MIT.
Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito (1992) Move α. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Longobardi, Giuseppe (1991) ‘In defense of the correspondence hypothesis: island effects and parasitic constructions in logical form’, in: C.-T. James Huang and Robert May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Martin, Roger (1992) On the Distribution and Case Features of PRO. Ms., University of Connecticut.
Pesetsky, David (1987) ‘WH-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in: Eric Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 98–129.
Pesetsky, David (1989) Language Particular Processes and the Earliness Principle. Ms., MIT.
Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland (1993) ‘Reflexivity’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 657–720.
Rizzi, Luigi (1982) Issues in Italian Syntax. Foris, Dordrecht.
Rizzi, Luigi (1990) Relativized Minimality. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Rizzi, Luigi (1991) Residual Verb Second and the Wh-Criterion. Ms., Universite de Geneve.
Stowell, Timothy (1982) ‘The tense of infinitives’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 561–570.
Ura, Hiroyuki (1994) Varieties of Raising and the Feature-based Phrase Structure Theory (chapter 1). Ms., MIT.
Watanabe, Akira (1991) Wh-in-situ, Subjacency and Chain Formation. Ms., MIT.
Williams, Edwin (1980) ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 208–238.
Williams, Edwin (1994) Thematic Structure in Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Williams, Edwin (1995) Blocking and Anaphora. Ms., University of Princeton.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brody, M. (1997). Perfect Chains. In: Haegeman, L. (eds) Elements of Grammar. Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4298-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5420-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive