Abstract
Stimulus-Response Coding is treated in the framework of compatibility. A taxonomy is presented based on the dimensional overlap model (Kornblum, Hasbroucq, and Osman, 1990) that includes four different types of S-R ensembles. Some of the literature on human performance with each type of ensemble is reviewed, and new data are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., and Donchin, E. A. (1985). Psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529–553.
Eriksen, C. W., and Schultz, D. W. (1979).Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249–263.
Fitts, P. M., and Deininger, R. L.(1954).S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 498–492.
Fitts, P. M., and Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Fitts, P. M., and Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46,199–210.
Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
Green, E. J., and Barber, P. J. (1988). Interference effects in an auditory Stroop task: Congruence and correspondence. Acta Psychologica, 53, 183–194.
Keele, S W. (1967). Compatibility and time sharing in serial reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 529–539.
Keele, S. W. (1972). Attention demands of memory retrieval. J. Experimental Psychology, 93,245–248.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., and Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy.Psychological Review, 97,253–270.
Proctor, R. W., and Reeve, G. T. (190). Stimulus-response compatibility, An integrated perspective. North-Holland: Amsterdam.
Schvaneveldt, R. W., and Staudenmayer, H. (1970). Mental arithmetic and the uncertainty effect in choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 111–117.
Simon, J. R. and Small, A. M. (1969) Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433–435.
Simon, J. R., and Sudalaimuthu, P. (1979). Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop task. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 176–187.
Smith, G. A. (1978). Studies of compatibility and investigations of a model of reaction time. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Adelaide.
Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.
Welford, A. T. (1976).Skilled performance: Perceptual and motor skills. Glenview, IL: Foreman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kornblum, S. (1991). Stimulus-Response Coding in Four Classes of Stimulus-Response Ensembles. In: Requin, J., Stelmach, G.E. (eds) Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience. NATO ASI Series, vol 62. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3626-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3626-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5609-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3626-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive