Abstract
Let us now use the material of the [earlier sections of ‘Against Method’] to throw light on the following features of contemporary empiricism: first, the distinction between a context of discovery and a context of justification; second, the distinction between observational terms and theoretical terms; third, the problem of incommensurability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Papirer, ed. by P. A. Heiberg (Copenhagen, 1909), VII, Part I, see A, No. 182. Cf. also Sections 7ff of my forthcoming paper ‘Abriss einer anarchistischen Erkenntnislehre’.
This seems to occur in certain versions of the general theory of relativity. Cf. A. Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffmann, ‘The Gravitational Equations and the Problem of Motion’, Annals of Mathematics 39 (1938), 65, and Sen, Fields andjor Particles, pp. 19ff.
This seems to occur in certain versions of the general theory of relativity. Cf. A. Einstein, L. Infeld, and B. Hoffmann, ‘The Gravitational Equations and the Problem of Motion’, Annals of Mathematics 39 (1938), 65, and Sen, Fields andjor Particles, pp. 19ff.
For this point and further arguments see A. S. Eddington, The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1963, p. 33. The more general problem of concepts and numbers has been treated by Hegel, Logik, I, Das Mass.
R. Carnap, ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. I, ed. by H. Feigl and M. Scriven ( University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1956 ), p. 47.
As an example the reader is invited to consult J. Piaget, The Construction of Reality in the Child, Basic Books, New York, 1954.
Ibid., pp. 5ff.
Carnap, ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts’, p. 40. Cf. also C. G. Hempel, Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966, pp. 74ff.
Carnap, ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts’, p. 40. Cf. also C. G. Hempel, Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966, pp. 74ff.
Cf. B. Brecht, ‘Ueber das Zerpfluecken von Gedichten’, Über Lyrik (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1964 ). In my lectures on the theory of knowledge I usually present and discuss the thesis that finding a new theory for given facts is exactly like finding a new production for a well-known play. For painting see also E. Gombrich, Art and Illusion ( Pantheon, New York, 1960 ).
Cf. B. Brecht, ‘Ueber das Zerpfluecken von Gedichten’, Über Lyrik (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1964 ). In my lectures on the theory of knowledge I usually present and discuss the thesis that finding a new theory for given facts is exactly like finding a new production for a well-known play. For painting see also E. Gombrich, Art and Illusion ( Pantheon, New York, 1960 ).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feyerabend, P.K. (1976). The Rationality of Science. In: Harding, S.G. (eds) Can Theories be Refuted?. Synthese Library, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0630-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1863-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive