Skip to main content

Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Pacemaker Malfunction

  • Chapter
What’s New in Electrocardiography

Abstract

The widespread use of cardiac pacemakers [1] has added a new dimension to clinical electrocardiography because about 99% of all cases of pacemaker malfunction can be detected with the conventional electrocardiogram (ECG). This chapter outlines our approach to the problem of pacemaker malfunction (Table 1) with emphasis on some of the newer concepts. The large variety of pacemaker models from a proliferating number of manufacturers has rendered the subject increasingly complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldman BS, Parsonnet V: World survey on cardiac pacing. Pace 2(5):W-1, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon AJ: Vector analysis of the stimulus artifact in patients with endocardial pacemakers. J Electrocardiol 4:91, 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Escher DJW, Furman S.: Modern methods of follow-up of the patient with an implanted cardiac pacemaker. Am J Cardiol 28:359, 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Green GD, Forles W, Bain WH, Shaw GB, Kenmure ACF: Detection of faults in implanted cardiac pacemakers. Br Heart J 31:707, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Green GD: Assessment of cardiac pacemakers: pacemaker frontal plane vector. Am Heart J 81:1, 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fontaine G, Sautel JM, Bonnet M, Stoltz J, Grossgogeat Y, Welti JJ: Le syndrome de fuite électrique chez les porteurs de pacemaker. Arch Mal Coeur 65:190, 1972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaeger M, Rivier JL: L’electrocardiogramme du spike chez les porteurs de pacemaker. Detection des fuites électriques sur sondes bipolaires. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 103:14, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Preston TA: Electrocardiographic diagnosis of pacemaker catheter displacement. Am Heart J 85:445, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheridan DJ, Reid DS, Williams DO, Gold RG: Mechanical failure causing current leakage with unipolar pacemakers. Significance and detection. Eur J Cardiol 8:1, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coumel P, Mugica J, Barold SS: Demand pacemaker arrhythmias caused by intermittent incomplete electrode fracture. Diagnosis with testing magnet. Am J Cardiol 36:105, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mugica J, Dubos M, Duconge R, Ricordeau G: Inhibition d’un stimulateur à la demande par courant de rupture dans un cas particulièrement typique de fracture d’électrode. Cœur 8:875, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barold SS, Scovil J, Ong LS, Heinle RA: Periodic pacemaker spike attenuation with preservation of capture: an unusual electrocardiographic manifestation of partial pacing electrode fracture. Pace 1:375, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mugica J, Duconge R, Dubos M, Lazarus B: Methods for recording intermittent contact signals in demand pacemaker arrhythmias (11 cases). Pace 1:222, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mower MM, Aranage CE, Tabatznik B: Unusual patterns of conduction produced by pacemaker stimuli. Am Heart J 74:24, 1967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barold SS, Narula OS, Javier RP, Linhart JW, Lister JW, Samet P: Significance of right bundle branch block patterns during pervenous ventricular pacing. Br Heart J 31:285, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Barold SS, Linhart JW, Hildner FJ, Samet P: Hemodynamic comparison of endocardial pacing of outflow and inflow tracts of the right ventricle. Am J Cardiol 23:697, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Castellanos A Jr, Maytin O, Lemberg L, Castillo C: Unusual QRS complexes produced by pacemaker stimuli. Am Heart J 77:732, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Castellanos A Jr, Lemberg L: Electrophysiology of pacing and cardioversion. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969, p 1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Castellanos A Jr, Ortiz JM, Pastis N, Castillo C: The electrocardiogram in patients with pacemakers. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 13:190, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barold SS, Gaidula JJ: Selected electrographic manifestations of cardiac pacing. Cardiol Dig 7:16, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barold SS, Ong LS, Heinle RA: Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with transvenous pacemakers. J Electrocardiol 9:99, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barold SS, Ong LS: Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with transvenous ventricular pacemakers. In: Norman J, Richards A (eds) Proceedings of colloquium on cardiac pacing. Arnheim, The Netherlands, Vitatron Med, 1976, p 164.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Castellanos A Jr, Zoble R, Procacci PM, Myerburg RJ, Berkovits BV: St-qR pattern: new sign of diagnosis of anterior myocardial infarction during right ventricular pacing. Br Heart J 35:1161, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barold SS: Clinical problems with temporary ventricular pacing. In: Furman S, Escher DJW (eds) Modern cardiac pacing. A clinical overview. Bowie MD, Brady, 1975, p 115.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Castellanos A, Befeler B, Myerburg RJ, Castillo C, Agha AS, Vagueiro MC: Functional properties of the ventricular muscle and distal conducting system during right ventricular stimulation. Eur J Cardiol 1:41, 1973.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gulotta SJ: Transvenous cardiac pacing. Techniques for optimal electrode positioning and prevention of coronary sinus placement. Circulation 42:701, 1970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kemp A, Kjersgaard J, Kjoegaard E: Malplacement of endocardial pacemaker electrodes in the middle cardiac vein. Acta Med Scand 199:7, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Colvard MC Jr, Whalen RE, Johnsrude I, Oldham N: Transvenous pacing, alternate bilateral bundle branch block, and syncope. Arch Intern Med 132:411, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barold SS, Banner R: Unusual Electrocardiographic pattern during transvenous pacing from the middle cardiac vein. Pace 1:31, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stillman MT, Richards AM: Perforation of the intraventricular system by transvenous pacemaker catheter. Diagnosis by change in pattern of depolarization on the electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol 24:269, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng TO: Coronary sinus pacing masquerading as interventricular septal perforation by transvenous catheter. I. Am J Cardiol 26:547, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Castellanos A Jr, Castillo C: Coronary sinus pacing masquerading as interventricular septal perforation by transvenous catheter. II. Am J Cardiol 26:548, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bauman DJ, Lamb KC, Tsagaris TJ: Unusual QRS waveforms associated with permanent pacemakers. Chest 64:480, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. O’Reilley MV, Murnaghan DP, Williams MB: Transvenous pacemaker failure induced by hyperkalemia JAMA 228:336, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gay RJ, Brown DF: Pacemaker failure due to procaineamide toxicity. Am J Cardiol 34:728, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mehta J, Kahn AH: Pacemaker Wenckebach phenomenon due to antiarrhythmic drug toxicity. Cardiology 61:189, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Moss AJ, Goldstein S: Clinical and pharmacological factors associated with pacemaker latency and incomplete pacemaker capture. Br Heart J 31:112, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Klein HO, DiSegni E, Kaplinsky E, Schamroth L: The Wenckebach phenomenon between electric pacemaker and ventricle. Br Heart J 38:961, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Peter T, Harper R, Hunt D, Sloman G: Wenckebach phenomenon in the exit area from a transvenous pacing electrode. Br Heart J 38:201, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Barold SS, Center S: Electrographic diagnosis of perforation of the heart by pacing catheter electrode. Am J Cardiol 24:274, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. VanDurme JP, Heyndrickx G, Snoeck J, Vermeire P, Pannier R: Diagnosis of myocardial perforation by intracardiac electrograms recorded from the indwelling catheter. J Electrocardiol 6:97, 1973.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Vera Z, Mason DT, Awan N, Klein R, Olson H, Williams DO, Janzer D, McMillin D: Perforation of right ventricle by endocardial pacemaker electrodes: clinical observations with special reference to role of intracardiac electrography. In: Meere C (ed) Cardiac pacing, Proceedings of the 6th world symposium on cardiac pacing, ch 14–15. Montreal, Pacesymp, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ven Kataraman K, Bilitch M: Intracardiac electrocardiography during permanent pacemaker implantation: predictors of cardiac perforation. Am J Cardiol 44:225, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dolora A, Camilli L: Supernormal excitation and conduction. Electrocardiographic observations during subthreshold stimulation in two patients with implanted pacemaker. Am J Cardiol 21: 746, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dressler W, Jonas S, Schwartz J: Supernormal phase of myocardial excitability in man. Circulation [Suppl 2] 32:79, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Parker DP, Kaplan MA: Demonstration of the supernormal period in the intact human heart as a result of pacemaker failure. Chest 59:461, 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Driller J, Barold SS, Parsonnet V: Normal and abnormal function of the pacemaker magnetic reed switch. J Electrocardiol 9:283, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kreis DJ Jr, LiCalzi L, Shaw RK: Air entrapment as a cause of transient cardiac pacemaker malfunction. Pace 2:641, 1979.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fiedman A, Dobrow RJ: Phantom pacemaker programming. Pace 1:166, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Barold SS, Ong LS, Scovil J, Heinle RA, Wright T: Reprogramming of implanted pacemaker following external defibrillation. Pace 1:514, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Barold SS, Ong LS, Falkoff MD, Heinle RA: Selection of optimal pacing system for the individual patient. In: Rapaport E (ed) Cardiology update. New York, Elsevier, 1981, p 283.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Harper R, Peter T, Hunt D, Smith D, Sloman G: Runaway pacemaker rhythm after 36 hours of electrical inactivity. Br Heart J 36:610, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Chudasama L, Ernest AC, Greif E, Nejat M: Runaway temporary pacemaker: case report of a “runaway temporary pacemaker” with a rate over 1500/min. Pace 1:529, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Odabashian HC, Brown DF: “Runaway” in a modern generation pacemaker. Pace 2:152, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Inoue H, Veda K, Ohkawa SI, Mifune JI, Sugiura M: Runaway pacemaker. A case report with a runaway rate of 2100 ppm. Pace 2:608, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Barold SS: Clinical significance of pacemaker refractory periods. Am J Cardiol 28:27, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Barold SS: Current problems with demand pacemakers. Eur J Cardiol 1:339, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Barold SS, Ong LS, Heinle RA: Demand pacemakers. Normal and abnormal mechanisms of sensing. In: Samet P, El-Sherif N (eds) New York, Grune and Stratton, 1980, p 551.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Furman S, Hurzeler P, DeCapio V: The ventricular endocardial electrogram and pacemaker sensing. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 73:258, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Thorman J, Schwarz F, Ensslen R: Evaluation of implanted faulty demand pacemakers by magnet waving and electrical chest wall stimulation. Eur J Cardiol 5:139, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Barold SS, Gaidula JJ: Evaluation of normal and abnormal sensing functions of demand pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 28:201, 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Barold SS, Pupillo GA, Gaidula JJ, Linhart JW: Chest wall stimulation in evaluation of patients with implanted ventricular-inhibited demand pacemakers. Br Heart J 32:783, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Barold SS, Gaidula JJ, Castillo R, Masood A, Keller JW: Evaluation of demand pacemakers by chest wall stimulation. Chest 63:598, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Samet P, Abbas SZ, Hildner FJ, Javier RP, Befeler B, Schoenfeld CD: Effect of chest wall stimulation on cardiac pacemaker function. Am J Med Sci 260:285, 1970.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Levine PA, Klein MD: Discrepant electrocardiographic and pulse analyzer endocardial potentials: a possible source of pacemaker sensing ch 34–16. In: Meere C (ed) Cardiac pacing, Proceedings of the 6th world congress on cardiac pacing. Montreal, Pacesymp, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Myers GH, Kresh YM, Parsonnet V: Characteristics of intracardiac electrograms. Pace 1:90, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Kleinen M, Elmqvist H, Strandberg H: Spectral properties of atrial and ventricular endocardial signals. Pace 2:11, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Furman S, Hurzeler P, DeCaprio V: Cardiac pacing and pacemakers III: sensing the cardiac electrogram. Am Heart J 93:794, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Hurzeler P, DeCaprio V, Furman S: Endocardial electrograms and pacemaker sensing. In: Schaldach M, Furman S (eds) Advances in pacemaker technology. Heidelberg, Springer, 1975, p 307.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Vera Z, Mason DT, Awan NA, Hilliard G, Massumi RA: Lack of sensing by demand pacemakers due to intraventricular conduction defects. Circulation 51:815, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Fontaine GH, Frank R, Fillette F, Grosgogeat Y: Electrophysiology of pseudofusion. In: Meere C (ed) Cardiac pacing, Proceedings of the 6th world symposium on cardiac pacing, ch 2–5. Montreal, Pacesymp, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Castellanos A Jr, Agha AS, Befeler B, Castillo CA, Berkovits BV: A study of arrival of excitation at selected ventricular sites during human bundle branch block using close bipolar electrodes. Chest 63:815, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Falkoff M, Ong LS, Heinle RA, Barold SS: The noise sampling period: a new cause of apparent sensing malfunction of demand pacemakers. Pace 1:250, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Furman S: Pacemaker emergencies. Med Clin North Am 63:113, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Barold SS, Keller JS: Sensing problems with demand pacemakers. In: Samet P (ed) Cardiac pacing. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1973, p 385.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sung RJ, Castellanos A Jr, Thurer RJ, Myerburg RJ: Partial pacemaker recycling of implanted QRS-inhibited pulse generators. Pace 1:189, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Yokoyama M, Wada J, Hirosawa K: Unusual demand pacemaker arrhythmia due to partial recycling in the relative refractory period. Pace 2:225, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Friedberg HD, Barold SS: On hysteresis in pacing. J Electrocardiol 6:1, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Furman S, Escher DJW: Arrhythmias associated with hysteresis ventricular inhibited pacing. Chest 64:666, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Thompson ME, Shaver JA: Undesirable cardiac arrhythmias associated with rate hysteresis pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 38:685, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Preston TA, Preston AW: The automatic rate adjustment pacemaker. The possibilities of rate hysteresis. Pace 1:178, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Azulay A, Vagnini FJ, Saha CK, Frantz SL: Permanent prophylactic ventricular demand pacing with VVI extended negative rate/hysteresis, ch 16–5. In: Meere C (ed) Cardiac pacing, Proceedings of the 6th world symposium on cardiac pacing. Montreal, Pacesymp, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Irnich W, Parsonnet V, Myers GH: Compendium of pacemaker technology II. Definitions and glossary, part 2. Pace 2:634, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Chatterjee K, Sutton R, Davis JG: Low intracardiac potentials in myocardial infarction as a cause of failure of inhibition of demand pacemakers. Lancet 1:511, 1968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. DeCaprio V, Hurzeler P, Furman S: A comparison of unipolar and bipolar electrograms for cardiac pacemaker sensing. Circulation 56:750, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Barold SS, Gaidula JJ: Failure of demand pacemaker from low bipolar ventricular electrograms. JAMA 215:923, 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Ohm OJ: The interdependence between electrogram, total electrode impedance and pacemaker input impedance necessary to obtain adequate functioning of demand pacemakers. Pace 2:465, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Haberern N, Ingram J, Oravec J, Spevak R, Rockland R, McCredy M, Barold SS: Effects of antiarrhythmic drugs and hyperkalemia on the ventricular electrogram in dogs with acute myocardial infarction. In: Watanabe Y (ed) Cardiac pacing. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1977, p 44.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Gaspar HCG, DeCaprio V, Escher DJW, Furman S: Influence of lidocaine and propranolol on temporary pacer sensing. Circulation [Suppl 2] 51 and 52: 11–187, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Haberern-Boyer N, Ingram J, Spevac R, Rockland R, Barold SS: Comparison of the electrogram of ventricular extrasystoles to the normally conducted beats in dogs. In: Meere C (ed) Cardiac pacing, Proceedings of 6th world symposium on cardiac pacing, ch 3–6. Montreal, Pacesymp, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Amundson DC: Sensing properties of pacemaker electrodes. Proc Eng Med Biol 17:83, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Raber MB, Cuddy TE, Israel DA: Pacemaker electrodes act as high-pass filters on the electrogram. In: Watanabe Y (ed) Cardiac pacing. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1977, p 506.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Hughes HC, Brownlee RR, Tyers GFO: Failure of demand pacing with small surface area electrodes. Circulation 54:128, 1976.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Amundson DC: Sensing thresholds. Impulse, April 1977, p 7.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Salem DN, Bornstein A, Levine PA, Costello D, Banas JS Jr: Fracture of pacing electrode mimicking failure of pulse generator. Chest 74:673, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Nevins MA, Landau S, Lyon JL: Failure of demand pacemaker sensing due to electrode fracture. Chest 59:110, 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Keller JW, Gosselin AJ, Nathan DA, Stults RH, Bhavati S, Lister J: Rhythm anomalies in contemporary demand pacing. Am J Cardiol 29:572, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Barold SS, Carroll M: Double reset of demand pacemakers. Am Heart J 84:276, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Taniguchr K, Takaoka T, Fujiwara H, Tabuchi K, Takeuchi T: Clinical experiences and experimental studies of false sensing with demand pacemakers. In: Watanabe Y (ed) Cardiac pacing. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1977, p 333.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Gould L, Reddy CVR, Singh BK, Bujung Z: Inappropriate slowing of the pacemaker rate with programmable demand pacemaker. Pace 2:370, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Barold SS, Ong LS, Falkoff M, Heinle RA: Complex demand pacemaker arrhythmias. The differential diagnosis of pacemaker pauses. In: Thalen HJTh, Harthorne JW (eds) To pace or not to pace. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1978, p 312.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Lasseter KC, Buchanan JW, Yoshonis KF: A mechanism for “ false” inhibition of demand pacemakers. Circulation 42:1093, 1970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Furman S, DeCaprio V: Electrode causation of pacemaker inhibition. Chest 72:117, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Yokoyama M, Hori M, Grechko M: Suppression of demand mechanism by inactive myocardial electrodes. Pace 1:126, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Chandra MS, Patel MR, Laughlin DE, Rossi NP: “False inhibition” of demand pacemaker due to leakage of fluid into the pacemaker lead socket. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 75:765, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Widmann WC, Mangolia S, Lubow LA, Dolan FM: Suppression of demand pacemakers by inactive pacemaker electrodes. Circulation 45:319, 1972.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Waxman HL, Lazzara R, El-Sherif N: Apparent malfunction of demand pacemakers due to spurious potentials generated by contact between two endocardial electrodes. Pace 1:531, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Williams DO, Thomas DJ: Muscle potentials simulating pacemaker malfunction. Br Heart J 38:1096, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Hillis JS: Arm raising: an unusual cause of intermittent pacemaker malfunction. J Indiana Med Assoc 65:114, 1972.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Widlansky S, Zipes DP: Suppression of a ventricular-inhibited bipolar pacemaker by skeletal muscle activity. J Electrocardiol 7:371, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Amikam S, Peleg H, Lemer L, Riss E: Myopotential inhibition of a bipolar pacemaker caused by electrode insulation defect. Br Heart J 39:1279, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Barold SS, Ong LS, Falkoff MD, Heinle RA: Inhibition of bipolar demand pacemaker by diaphragmatic myopotentials. Circulation 56:679, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Furman S, Escher DJW, Lister J, Schwedel JB: A comprehensive scheme for management of pacemaker malfunction. Ann Surg 63:611, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Waxman MB, Berman ND, Sanz G, Downar E, Mendler P, Taylor KWG: Demand pacemaker malfunction due to abnormal sensing. Circulation 50:389, 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Geddes JS: Auto-interference by a demand pacemaker. Eur J Cardiol 5:87, 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Levine PA: Pacemaker puzzles, vol 1, no. 7. Sylmar CA, Pacesetter System, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Massumi RA, Mason DT, Amsterdam EA, Salel AF: Apparent malfunction of demand pacemaker caused by non-propagated (concealed) ventricular extrasystoles. Chest 61:426, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Rosen KM, Rahimtoola SH, Gunnar RM: Pseudo A-V block secondary to premature non-propagated His bundle depolarizations. Documentation by His bundle electrocardiography. Circulation 42:367, 1970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Fontaine G, Frank R, Petitot JC, Grosgogeat Y: Risks of delayed potentials in pacemaker patients prone to ventricular tachycardia. Pace 1:465, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Wirtzfeld A, Lampadius M, Ruprecht EO: Unterdrückung von Demand-Schrittmachern durch Muskelpotentiale. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 97:61, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Irnich W, de Bakker JM: Filter characteristics of pacemaker amplifiers. Med Biol Eng 13:889, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Mymin D, Cuddy TE, Sinha SN, Winter DA: Inhibition of demand pacemakers by skeletal muscle potentials. JAMA 223:527, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Peter T, Harper R, Sloman G: Inhibition of demand pacemakers caused by potentials associated with inspiration. Br Heart J 38:211, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Baggioni GF, Antonioli GE: Cause apparentemente insolite di inibizione dei pacemakers unipolari a domanda. G Ital Cardiol 8:61, 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. El Gamal M, Van Gelder B: Suppression of an external demand pacemaker by diaphragmatic myopotentials: a sign of electrode perforation? Pace 2:191, 1979.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Sutton R, Elsberry D: Stimulation threshold and waveform analysis of atrial endocardial leads in atrial pacemaker design. In: Meere C (ed) Cardiac pacing, Proceedings of the 6th world symposium on cardiac pacing, ch 34–12. Montreal, Pacesymp, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Castillo CA, Berkovits BV, Castellanos A Jr, Lemberg L, Gallard G, Jude JR: Bifocal demand pacing. Chest 59:360, 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Furman S, Reicher-Reiss H, Escher DJW: Atrioventricular sequential pacing and pacemakers. Chest 63:783, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Lévy S, Gérard R, Jausseran JM, Boyer C, Clementy J, Baudet E, Bricaud H: Long-term results of permanent atrioventricular sequential demand pacing. Pace 2:175, 1979.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Barold SS, Falkoff MD, Ong LS, Heinle RA: Characterization of pacemaker arrhythmias due to normally functioning AV demand (DVI) pulse generators. Pace 3:712, 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barold, S.S., Falkoff, M.D., Ong, L.S., Heinle, R.A. (1981). Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Pacemaker Malfunction. In: Wellens, H.J.J., Kulbertus, H.E. (eds) What’s New in Electrocardiography. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8239-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8239-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2452-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8239-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics