Skip to main content

Abstract

Transition has been described as the passage from one place, stage, style or subject to another over time’. Throughout a lifetime a person will move through numerous transitions, many simultaneously. For a young child, two important and overlapping transitions are starting school and learning to write. Each brings new and different processes and expectations for the child. It has been widely acknowledged that successful school transition plays an important role in later school success. However, the idea that starting school and learning to write are two overlapping transitions has not seen the same level of scrutiny. Starting school and learning to write may also overlap, interact or intersect with further transitions involving, for example, parental separation or a change in location. This chapter examines how the starting school transition could affect the learning to write transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). Australian Curriculum (Version 3.0). http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/ Accessed 16 Oct 2012.

  • Board of Studies, NSW. (2007). English K-6 syllabus. Sydney: Board of Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies, NSW. (2011). Home education in NSW information package. Sydney: Board of Studies. http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/parents/pdf_doc/home-edu-info-pack-11.pdf Accessed 18 Oct 2012.

  • Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development (2nd ed., Vol. 3). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. N. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 993–1029). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J. P., & Wasik, B. A. (2009). Language and literacy development: What educators need to know. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, M. (2005). ‘They do it anyway’: A study of Primary 1 teachers’ perceptions of children’s transition into primary education. Early Years, 25(2), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L., Cheng, Z. J., & Chan, L. F. (2008). Chinese preschool children’s literacy development: from emergent to conventional writing. Early Years, 28(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. M. (1975). What did I write? Beginning writing behaviour. Auckland: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Auckland: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. M. (2001). Change over time in children’s literacy development. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Angiulli, A., Siegal, L. S., & Hertzman, C. (2004). Schooling, socioeconomic context and literacy development. Educational Psychology, 24(6), 867–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datar, A. (2006). Does delaying kindergarten entrance give children a head start? Economics of Education Review, 25(1), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, T., Goouch, K., & Jago, M. (2001). Cultural constructions of childhood and early literacy. Reading, 35(2), 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra: Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D. K., & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drouin, M., & Harmon, J. (2009). Name writing and letter knowledge in preschoolers: Incongruities in skills and the usefulness of name writing as a developmental indicator. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(3), 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A. H. (2001). Writing and children’s symbolic repertoires: Development unhinged. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 1, pp. 126–141). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsdóttir, J. (2006). From pre-school to primary school: When different contexts meet. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (2003). The first grade challenge: Transition stress. Childcare Information Exchange (November/December), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farver, J. A. M., Xu, Y., Eppe, S., & Lonigan, C. J. (2006). Home environments and young Latino children’s school readiness. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(2), 196–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Exeter: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. A., Lambert, R., Abbott-Shim, M., McCarty, F., & Franze, S. (2005). A model of home learning environment and social risk factors in relation to children’s emergent literacy and social outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(1), 13–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genishi, C., & Dyson, A. H. (2009). Children, language and literacy: Diverse learners in diverse times. New York/London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas Dyson, A. (1985). Individual differences in emerging writing. In M. Farr (Ed.), Advances in writing research (Vol. 1, pp. 59–126). Norwood: Ablex Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. L., Carrol, J., Comer, J. P., & Catherine, S.-L. (2006). A missing link in early childhood transitions. Young Children, 61(5), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamii, C., Long, R., & Manning, M. (2001). Kindergarteners’ development toward “invented” spelling and a glottographic theory. Linguistics & Education, 12(2), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenner, C. (2000). Symbols make text: A social semiotic analysis of writing in a multilingual nursery. Written Language & Literacy, 3(2), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, Y.-I. (2002). Changing curriculum for early childhood education in England. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 4(2). http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4n2/kwon.html Accessed 5 Oct 2012.

  • Lynch, J. (2009). Preschool teachers’ beliefs about children’s print literacy development. Early Years, 29(2), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, N. M. (2011). From drawing to writing: What happens when you shift teaching priorities in the first six months of school? Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 34(3), 322–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, N. M., Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2011). How does teaching experience affect attitudes towards literacy learning and teaching in the early years? Issues in Educational Research, 21(3), 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margetts, K. (2002). Transition to school – Complexity and diversity. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 10(2), 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyles, J. (2007). Foreword. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years: Research, policy and practice (pp. xv–xvii). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Early Literacy Panel (NELP). (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the national early literacy panel. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S. B., Koh, S., & Dwyer, J. (2008). CHELLO: The child/home environmental language and literacy observation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSW Department of Education and Training. (2010). Best start. http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/beststart/index.htm Accessed 1 Aug 2010.

  • NSW Department of Education and Training. (2012). Language, learning and literacy (L3). http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/beststart/lll/index.htm Accessed 12 Oct 2012.

  • Peters, S. (2000, August). Multiple perspectives on continuity in early learning and the transition to school. Paper presented at the “Complexity, diversity and multiple perspectives in early childhood” Tenth European Early Childhood Education Research Association Conference, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. C. (1994). The limits of family influence. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, C., & Cope, P. (2003). An inclusive perspective on transition to primary school. European Educational Research Journal, 2(2), 262–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, M., & Parsons, M. (2007). Expectations: Effects of curriculum change as viewed by children, parents and practitioners. In A.-W. Dunlop & H. Fabian (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years: Research, policy and practice (pp. 137–148). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, E. (1995). Beginning writers in the zone of proximal development. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., Rowe, K., Underwood, C., & Peck, R. (2005). Numeracy in the early years: Project Good Start (Final Report). Canberra: Department of Education Science and Training. http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/GOODSTART_FinalReport.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2012.

  • Tolchinsky, L. (2006). The emergence of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 83–95). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 4). (R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, J. G., Sullivan, A., & Justice, L. M. (2003). That’s my letter!: What preschoolers’ name writing representations tell us about emergent literacy knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(2), 757–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing Jan, L. (2009). Write ways: Modelling writing forms (3rd ed.). South Melbourne: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noella Mackenzie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mackenzie, N. (2014). Transitions and Emergent Writers. In: Perry, B., Dockett, S., Petriwskyj, A. (eds) Transitions to School - International Research, Policy and Practice. International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7350-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics