Skip to main content

Supporting Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reading Comprehension
  • 5216 Accesses

Abstract

Reading comprehension often involves a collaborative approach incorporating techniques such as questioning and reciprocal teaching in which children adopt collaborative roles to analyse texts. The instructional environment for students with reading problems should provide positive language and vocabulary experiences within a problem-solving framework. A large body of research has demonstrated that interventions using trained tutors can have positive effects on students’ reading performance. The chapter will highlight the need for the adequate training of tutors and group members in cooperative learning situations. A number of principles will be discussed to enable procedures to be put into place in any intervention. They should also provide flexible and supportive structures to enable children to set reading goals, monitor their own progress by making informed choices, and to reflect on the adequacy of their learning. It discusses the optimum conditions for cooperative learning and what educators should consider in these learning situations such as a) creating a learning community by involving parents, teacher aides, or peers, b) knowing students as individuals, and c) focusing on success rather than on failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alfassi, M. 1998. Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal 35: 309–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, R., and C. Ames. 1984. Research on motivation in education: Student motivation, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D.S., C.J. Lonigan, G.J. Whitehurst, and J.N. Epstein. 1994. Accelerating language develop­ment through picture book reading: Replication and extension of a videotape training format. Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1993. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development functioning. Educational Psychologist 28: 117–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1999. Social cognitive theory of personality. In The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organisation, ed. D. Cervone and Y. Shoda, 185–241. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D.V.M., and L.B. Leonard. 2000. Speech language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Hove: Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D.F., and J.W. Jacobs. 1985. Associative and categorical processes in children’s memory: The role of automaticity in the development of organisation in free recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39: 599–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, C.C. 2004. Teaching comprehension: The comprehension process approach. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M. 2004. Academic motivation in self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal orientations, and attributional beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research 97(6): 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J.D., M. Carr, E. Rellinger, and M.G. Pressley. 1990. Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H., and B. Cambourne. 1987. Read and retell. Melbourne: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, T., and L. Munsie. 1992. Beyond tokenism: Parents as partners in literacy. Portsmouth, NY: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambourne, B. 2002. Conditions for literacy learning: From conditions of learning to conditions of teaching. The Reading Teacher 55: 358–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J.W., and W. Tunmer. 1997. A longitudinal study of beginning reading achievement and self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J.W., and W. Tunmer. 2003. Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading and Writing Quarterly 19: 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M.M. 1978. Reading: The patterning of complex behaviour. Auckland: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P., J.A. Kulik, and C.L. Kulik. 1982. Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal 19: 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.E. 2002. What motivates students to read? Four literacy personalities. The Reading Teacher 56: 326–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, C., and L. Bornholt. 2003. Reading self-concepts and task choices for student with reading difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties 3: 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L., and S. Matthey. 2001. Helping parents read with their children: evaluation of an individual and group reading motivation programme. Journal of Research in Reading 1: 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colmar, S., and K. Wheldall. 1996. Three ‘P’s for effective tutoring of low progress readers: Pause prompt and praise. In Prevention of reading failure, ed. A.J. Watson and A.M. Badenhop, 158–167. Sydney: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M.V. 1984. Research on motivation in education: Student motivation, Vol. 1, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K., and J.T. Guthrie. 2001. Motivational and cognitive contributions to students’ amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology 26: 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S.J. 1990. Remediating academic difficulties through strategy training: The acquisition of useful knowledge. Remedial and Special Education 11: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N.K., and P.D. Pearson. 2002. Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In What research has to say about reading instruction, 3rd ed, ed. A.E. Farstrup and S.J. Samuels, 205–242. Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, D., and C. Monereo. 2005. Styles and sequences of cooperative interaction in fixed and reciprocal peer tutoring. Learning and Instruction 15: 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J.A., and J. Hewison. 1994. Comprehension and interest in home reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology 64: 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountas, I.C., and G.S. Pinnell. 1996. Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fresko, B., and M. Chen. 1989. Ethnic similarity, tutor expertise, and tutor satisfaction in cross-age tutoring. American Educational Research Journal 26: 122–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins, I.W. 2003. Taking charge of reader, text, activity and context variables. In Rethinking reading comprehension, ed. A.P. Sweet and C.E. Snow, 141–165. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, T., and S. McNaughton. 2002. Trust your own observations: Assessment of reader and tutor behaviour in learning to read in English and Maori. International Journal of Disability 49: 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, L. 1981. Learned helplessness and attribution theory. Learning Disability Quarterly 4: 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay, F., H.W. Marsh, and M. Boivin. 2003. Academic self-concept and achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, T.G. 2003. The role of readability in today’s classrooms. Topics in Language Disorders 23: 175–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J.T. 1996. Educational contexts for literacy engagement in literacy. The Reading Teacher 49: 432–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J.T., and M.H. Davis. 2003. Motivating the struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly 19: 59–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J.T., K.E. Cox, K.T. Knowles, M. Buehl, S.A. Mazzoni, and L. Fasulo. 2000. Building toward coherent instruction. In Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation, ed. L. Baker, M.J. Dreher, and J.T. Guthrie, 209–236. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hareli, S., and B. Weiner. 2002. Social emotions and personality inferences: A scaffold for a new direction in the study of achievement motivation. Educational Psychologist 37: 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J.A. 1992. Self-concept. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, I., A. Ashman, and C.E. van Kraayenoord. 1997. Investigating the influence of achievement on self-concept using intra-class design and a comparison of the PASS and SDQ-1 self-concept tests. British Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison, J., and J. Tizard. 1980. Parental involvement and reading attainment. British Journal of Educational Psychology 50: 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., and J.M. Harackiewicz. 2000. Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical Issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research 70: 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, D. 1980. Independence in reading: A handbook on individualized procedures, 2nd ed. Gosford: Ashton Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, S., and A. Bain. 1993. Peer tutoring with ESL and below average readers. Journal of Behavioural Education 3: 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A., A. Staffieri, and A. Adelgais. 1998. Mutual peer tutoring of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 90: 134–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen, R., and M. Vauras. 1997. Comprehension monitoring and the level of comprehension in high- and low-achieving primary school children’s reading. Learning and Instruction 17: 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J.R., and J.S. Savage. 2008. Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy 42(2): 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. 2005. Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction 15: 381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, M.I., and L.O. Ollila. 1996. Parent involvement in literacy programs. In Prevention of reading failure, ed. A. Watson and A. Badenhop, 204–216. Sydney: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, M.G., I.L. Beck, and R.G.K. Blake. 2009. Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly 44(3): 218–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S., J. Parr, H. Timperly, and V. Robinson. 1992. Beginning reading and sending books home to read: A case for fine tuning. Educational Psychology 12: 239–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.D. 2003. How high- and low-challenge tasks affect motivation and learning: Implications for struggling learners. Reading and Writing Quarterly 19: 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L., and H. Goldstein. 2004. Teaching mothers in low socio-economic status to use decontextualized language during storybook reading. Journal of Early Intervention 26: 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, J.C., and P.R. Kelly. 2002. Delivering the promise of academic success through late intervention. Reading and Writing Quarterly 18: 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S.B. 1995. Reading together: A community – supported parent tutoring program. The Reading Teacher 49(2): 120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. 2000. Parental involvement in supporting children with learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties 5: 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Conner, E.A., and O. Simic. 2002. The effects of Reading Recovery on special education referrals and placements. Psychology in the Schools 39: 635–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overett, J., and D. Donald. 1998. Paired reading: effects of a parent involvement program in a disadvantaged community in South Africa. British Journal of Educational Psychology 68: 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S., and A.L. Brown. 1987. Enhancing instructional time through attention to metacognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities 20: 66–75 (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S.G., and P.N. Winograd. 1990. How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, ed. B.F. Jones and L. Idol, 15–51. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrum, R., T. Goetz, W. Titz, and R.P. Perry. 2002. Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37: 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, N.E., K.O. van de Kamp, L.K. Mercer, and C.J. Nordby. 2002. Investigating student-teacher interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 37: 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnell, G.S., C.A. Lyons, D.E. DeFord, A.S. Bryk, and M. Seltzer. 1994. Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly 29: 8–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M.G. 1998. Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: The Gilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, I., and R. Selznick. 1984. Self concept and reading, 2nd ed. Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, J. 1993. How pupils and staff experienced a peer tutoring project involving paired reading. Reading 27: 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, P. 1994. Doing school literacy at home. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 17: 333–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, M.F., and C. Vukelich. 2001. Understanding the gap between America Reads Program and the tutoring sessions: The nesting of challenges. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 16: 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehler, L.R., and G.G. Duffy. 1984. Direct explanation of comprehension processes. In Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions, ed. G.G. Duffy, L.R. Roehler, and J. Mason, 265–280. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck, C.A., M.D. Ginsburg-Block, and J.W. Fantuzzo. 2003. Peer assisted learning with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology 95: 240–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R.M., and E.L. Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. 2003. Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modelling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly 19: 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D.H., and M.J. Rice. 1991. Learning goals and progress feedback during reading comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading Behaviour 23: 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. 1978. Reading. London: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E. 2002. Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica: Rand Corp. Retrieved 12 Dec, 2002, from http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1465/.

  • Snow, C.E., S. Burns, and P. Griffin. 1998. Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenschein, S., and D. Schmidt. 2000. Fostering home and community connections to support children’s reading. In Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation, ed. L. Baker, M.J. Dreher, and J.T. Guthrie, 264–284. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. 1986. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 21: 360–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzby, E. 1985. Children’s emergent reading of favourite story books: A developmental study. Reading Research Quarterly 20: 458–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. 1987. Paired reading: A powerful technique for parent use. The Reading Teacher 40: 608–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. 1998. Effective tutoring in America Reads: A reply to Wasik. The Reading Teacher 52: 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, S., R. Gersten, and D. Chard. 2000. The underlying message in LD intervention research: findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children 67: 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velluntino, F.R. 2003. Individual differences as sources of variability in reading comprehension in elementary school children. In Rethinking reading comprehension, ed. A.P. Sweet and C.E. Snow, 51–81. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmeyer, R., and F. Rheinberg. 2005. A surprising effect of feedback on learning. Learning and Instruction 15: 589–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1962. Thought and language. Cambridge: Harvard University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J.H., and J.T. Guthrie. 2004. Modelling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly 39: 162–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B.A., and R.E. Slavin. 1993. Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly 28: 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., and P. Mettem. 1985. Behavioural peer tutoring: Training 16 year old tutors to employ the pause, prompt, praise method with 12-year-old remedial readers. Educational Psychology 5: 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheldall, K., F. Merrett, and S. Colmar. 1987. ‘Pause, prompt and praise’ for parents and peers; effective tutoring for low progress readers. Support for Learning 12: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G.L., and C.J. Lonigan. 1988. Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development 69: 848–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G.L., D.S. Arnold, N.J. Epstein, A.L. Angell, M. Smith, and J.E. Fischel. 1994. A picture book reading intervention in day care and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology 30: 679–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A. 2000. Facilitating children’s reading motivation. In Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation, ed. L. Baker, M.J. Dreher, and J.T. Guthrie, 140–158. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., J.T. Guthrie, S. Tonks, and K.C. Perencevich. 2004. Children’s motivation for reading: Domain specificity and instructional influences. The Journal of Educational Research 97(6): 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., and C. Moon. 1991. Parental Support of Independent Readers in the Junior School. Reading 25: 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, G.E. 2006. Comprehension difficulties after year 4: Actioning appropriately. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties 11(3): 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, G.E., and I. Hay. 1999. Enhancing the teaching of reading comprehension to students with special needs. In Learning disabilities: Advocacy and action, ed. P. Westwood and W. Scott, 67–78. Melbourne: Australian Resource Educators Association Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, J., E. Patterson, R. Salas, S. Prater, and M. Turner. 2002. More than just reading: The human factor in reaching resistant readers. Reading Research and Instruction 41: 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J. 2000. Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J. 2002. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice 41: 64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, L. 2003. The role of parents in motivating struggling readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly 19: 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, I. 1995a. Understanding self-perception: Some school and home implications. School Talk, August/September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. 1987a. Watching children read and write: Observational records for children with special needs. Melbourne: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. 1987b. Parents as teachers of literacy: What more have we learned from them? Australian Journal of Reading 10: 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B.A. 1998a. Using volunteers as reading tutors: Guidelines for successful practices. The Reading Teacher 51: 562–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasik, B.A. 1998b. Volunteer tutoring programs in reading: A review. Reading Research Quarterly 33: 266–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs, T.E., and R.T. Osguthorpe. 1986. Tutoring interventions within special education settings: A comparison of cross-age and peer tutoring. Psychology in the Schools 23:187193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagett, L. 1994. “No fears with peers”: A personal reflection on peer group tutoring in the context of reading development. Reading 28:3135.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S., T. Glynn, and V. Robinson. 1987. Pause, Prompt and Praise: Effective tutoring of remedial reading. Birmingham: Positive Products.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Woolley .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woolley, G. (2011). Supporting Learning. In: Reading Comprehension. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1174-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics