Abstract
This chapter discusses both the positive psychology movement (PPM) and self-determination theory (SDT), arguing that SDT is a prototypical example of a positive psychology theory. SDT provides a nuanced, integrated, and scientifically supported framework for understanding optimal functioning, while also addressing “negative” processes that can get in the way of optimal functioning. Two primary prescriptions for positive psychology researchers are derivable from SD: that the autonomy-supportiveness of providers will be crucial for the success of any positive intervention or context, and that the success of positive interventions or contexts can be gauged by how well they meet participants’ needs. Accusations that positive psychology is overly individualist are considered from the lens of SDT, which has already faced and answered such challenges. We suggest that the PPM might adopt SDT as a general framework within which to conduct many types of positive psychology research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benjamin, G. A. H., Kaszniak, A., Sales, B., & Shanfield, S. B. (1986). The role of legal education in producing psychological distress among law students and lawyers. America Bar Foundation Research Journal, 23, 225–252.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756.
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105–116.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Keltner, D. (2009). Born to be good: The science of a meaningful life. New York: Norton.
Krieger, L. S. (1998). What we’re not telling law students – and lawyers – that they really need to know: Some thoughts-in-acting toward revitalizing the profession from its roots. Journal of Law and Health, 13, 1–48.
Lazarus, R. S. (2003). The lazarus manifesto for positive psychology and psychology in general. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 173–189.
Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.
Ryff, C. D. (2003). Corners of myopia in the positive psychology parade. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 153–159.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.
Sheldon, K. M., Arndt, J., & Houser-Marko, L. (2003). In search of the organismic valuing process: The human tendency to move towards beneficial goal choices. Journal of Personality, 71, 835–869.
Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Ryan, R. M., Chirkov, V., Kim, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2004). Self-concordance and subjective well-being in four cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 209–233.
Sheldon, K. M., & Filak, V. (2008). Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness in a game-learning context: New evidence that all three needs matter. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 267–283.
Sheldon, K. M., Joiner, T., & Williams, G. (2003). Self-determination theory in the clinic: Motivating physical and mental health. London: Yale University Press.
Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. K. (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56, 216–217.
Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. (2004). Does law school undermine law students? Examining changes in goals, values, and well-being. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 261–286.
Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. K. (2007). Understanding the negative effects of legal education on law students: A longitudinal test and extension of self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 883–897.
Young-Eisendrath, P. (2003). Response to lazarus. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 170–172.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sheldon, K.M., Ryan, R.M. (2011). Positive Psychology and Self-Determination Theory: A Natural Interface. In: Chirkov, V., Ryan, R., Sheldon, K. (eds) Human Autonomy in Cross-Cultural Context. Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9667-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9667-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9666-1
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9667-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)