Abstract
This work draws together material from three bodies of knowledge with a demonstrable yet rarely explored synergy. These are conceptions of well-being and public good, features of globalisation and neo-liberalism, and the principles and practises of contemporary measurement, the application of the Rasch Model. The stimulus for the analysis was the function of the Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Society (PROMS). According to the PROMS Constitution, the mission of PROMS is to contribute to individual, community, and societal well-being and the public good in the Pacific region. This will be realised by application of Rasch Model measurement to understand the progress and impact of developments in areas such as communication technologies, educational reform, health provision, and welfare delivery. However, this understanding also needs to take into account the influence on these developments of the globalisation agendas of governments and multinational corporations. This paper maps out some ways for Rasch measurement to contribute to the improvement of people’s lives and to maximise the benefits of globalisation.
Invited address to the 2014 Symposium of the Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Society: Guangzhou, China.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Andrich, D. (2011). Rating scales and Rasch measurement. Expert Reviews Pharmacoeconomics Research, 11(5), 571–585.
Apple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18(1), 12–44. doi:10.1177/0895904803260022.
Astiz, M. F., Wiseman, A. W., & Baker, D. P. (2002). Slouching towards decentralization: Consequences of globalization for curricular control in national education systems. Comparative Education Review, 46(1), 66–88.
Australian Labor (2012). Reward payments for great teachers. Retrieved from http://www.alp.org.au/agenda/education—training/performance-pay/.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065.
Ball, S. J., & Youdell, D. (2008). Hidden privatization in public education. Education International. Retrieved from http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:kh0QIkVqgrEJ:scholar.google.com/+stephen+ball+neoliberal+education&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1.
Bartlett, L., Frederick, M., Gulbrandsen, T., & Murillo, E. (2002). The Marketization of education: public schools for private ends. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 33(1), 1–25. doi:10.1525/aeq.2002.33.1.5.
Beckmann, A., & Cooper, C. (2004). Globalisation, the new managerialism and education: Rethinking the purpose of education in Britain. The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 2(2). Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/?pageID=article&articleID=31.
Bezruczko, N. (Ed.). (2005). Rasch measurement in health sciences. Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Box, G. E. P. (1979). Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In R. L. Launer & G. N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Robustness in statistics (pp. 201–235). New York: Academic Press Inc.
Bunderson, C. V., & Newby, V. A. (2009). The relationships among design experiments, invariant measurement scales, and domain theories. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(2), 117–137.
Butland, D. (2008). Testing times: Global trends in marketisation of public education through accountability testing. NSW Teachers Federation. Retrieved from http://www.pandc.org.au/files/uploads/DButlandPaper.pdf.
Butterfield, H. (1957). The origins of modern science (revised edition). New York: The Free Press.
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chien, T. -W., Wang, W. -C., Wang, H. -Y., & Lin, H. -J. (2009). Online assessment of patients’ views on hospital performances using Rasch model’s KIDMAP diagram. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 135 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2727503/].
Clarke, M. (2012). Talkin’ ‘bout a revolution: the social, political, and fantasmatic logics of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 27(2), 173–191. doi:10.1080/02680939.2011.623244.
Cobbold T. (2012). School autonomy is not the success claimed. Save Our Schools. Retrieved from www.saveourschools.com.au/file_download/100.
Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259. doi:10.1080/09518390701281751.
Engelhard, G, Jr. (2013). Invariant measurement: Using Rasch models in the social, behavioural, and health sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
Fenwick, T. J. (2010). (“Un”)Doing standards in education with actor-network theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 117–133.
Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2002). The “Mystery of Capital” and of the human sciences. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 15(4), 854–857.
Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2006). Survey design recommendations [expanded from Fisher, W. P. Jr. (2000) Popular measurement, 3(1), pp. 58–59]. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 20(3), 1072-1074.
Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2007). Living capital metrics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21(1), 1092–1109.
Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giroux, H. A. (2005). Cultural studies in dark times: Public pedagogy and the challenge of neoliberalism. Fast Capitalism, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.fastcapitalism.com/.
Green, A. (2003). Education, globalisation and the role of comparative research. London Review of Education, 1(2), 84–97. doi:10.1080/14748460306686.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Heelan, P. A. (1998). The scope of hermeneutics in natural science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29(2), 273–298.
Hill, D. (2003). Global neo-liberalism, the deformation of education and resistance. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.jceps.com/?pageID=article&articleID=7.
Holton, G. (1988). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein (Revised ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Huppert, F. A., & Johnson, D. M. (2010). A controlled trial of mindfulness training in schools: The importance of practice for an impact on well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice, 5(4), 264–274.
Hursh, D. (2005). Neo-liberalism, markets and accountability: Transforming education and undermining democracy in the United States and England. Policy Futures in Education, 3(1), 3–15. Retrieved from firgoa.usc.es/drupal/files/hursh.pdf.
Hutchins, E. (2012). Concepts in practice as sources of order. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19, 314–323.
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM/WG 2). (2008). International vocabulary of metrology: Basic and general concepts and associated terms, 3rd ed. Sevres, France: International Bureau of Weights and Measures–BIPM. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2008.pdf.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1983). Ethnographic study of scientific work: Towards a constructivist interpretation. In Karin Knorr-Cetina & Michael Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. London: Sage.
Kuhn, T. S. (1961). The function of measurement in modern physical science. Isis, 52, 161–190.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21(1), 145–171.
Latour, B. (1990). Postmodern? no, simply amodern! steps towards an anthropology of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21(1), 145–171.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
Loeb, S., Valant, J., & Kasman, M. (2011). Increasing choice in the market for schools: Recent reforms and their effects on student achievement. National Tax Journal, 64(1), 141–164. Retrieved from cepa.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/A06-Loeb.pdf.
Mari, L., & Wilson, M. (2013). A gentle introduction to Rasch measurement models for metrologists. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 459(1), http://iopscience.iop.org/1742–6596/459/1/012002/pdf/1742-6596_459_1_012002.pdf.
Masters, G. N., Adams, R. J., & Lokan, J. (1994). Mapping student achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(6), 595–610.
Pendrill, L., & Fisher, W. P., Jr. (2013). Quantifying human response: Linking metrological and psychometric characterisations of man as a measurement instrument. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 459, http://iopscience.iop.org/1742–6596/459/1/012057.
Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Reprint, with foreword and afterword by B. D. Wright, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut.
Redden, G., & Low, R. (2012). My school, education, and cultures of rating and ranking. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34(1–2), 35–48. doi:10.1080/10714413.2012.643737.
Robertson, S. L. (2007). Remaking the world: Neo-liberalism and transformation of education and teachers’ labour. Centre for Globalisation, Education and Societies. Retrieved from http://www.bris.ac.uk/education/people/academicStaff/edslr/publications/17slr.
Scharff, R. (2011). Displacing epistemology: Being in the midst of technoscientific practice. Foundations of Science, 16(2), 227–243.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Free Press.
Stenner, A. J., Fisher, W. P., Jr., Stone, M. H., & Burdick, D. S. (2013). Causal Rasch models. Frontiers in Psychology: Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 4(536), 1–14 [doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00536].
Thorsen, D. E., & Lie, A. (2007). What is Neoliberalism. Oslo, Norway: Oslo universitesforlaget. Retrieved from http://folk.uio.no/daget/What%20is%20Neo- Liberalism%20FINAL.pdf.
Torres, C. A. (2009). Education and neoliberal globalization. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/82213992/Ebooksclub-org-Education-and-Neoliberal-Globalization-Routledge-Research-in-Education.
Waslander, S., Pater, C., & Weide, M. van der. (2010). Markets in education: An analytical review of empirical research on market mechanisms in education. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/5km4pskmkr27-en.
Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modelling approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Acknowledgments
The authors are extremely grateful to Carly Keay, a post-graduate student at Curtin University. The treatment of globalisation in this paper was from her research and writing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cavanagh, R.F., Fisher, W. (2015). Be Wary of What’s Coming from the West: Globalisation and the Implications for Measurement in the Human Sciences. In: Zhang, Q., Yang, H. (eds) Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium (PROMS) 2014 Conference Proceedings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47490-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47490-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47489-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47490-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)