Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Motive for Young Children’s Developing Concern for Others’ Well-Being as a Core Motive for Developing Prosocial Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dual-Process Theories in Moral Psychology

  • 739 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the underlying motive of prosocial behavior in young children, particularly the function of benevolent feelings. On an evolutionary scale, the human capacity for genuine other-oriented behavior significantly contributed to a group’s survival as a whole. Studies on the ontogeny of prosocial behavior suggest that the motive of young children’s helping behavior is a genuine concern for another’s well-being. By the second year of life, children engage in various ways on behalf of others, including fulfilling others’ goals and comforting those who are hurt. A brief review of this developmental work is provided with a focus on specifying the intrinsic motivational mechanism of children’s prosociality. Not only do children show signs of genuinely selfless behavior, but their concern for others develops to include more flexible sympathetic responses, such that children help less if a request for help is unjustified. Children’s sympathetic helping is driven by an assessment of the person’s actual need. Such insights into justified and unjustified requests for help may represent one crucial step toward children’s more flexible forms of prosociality, including moral behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axelrod, R. (2006). The evolution of cooperation: revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barta, Z., McNamara, J., Huszár, D., & Taborsky, M. (2011). Cooperation among non-relatives evolves by state-dependent generalized reciprocity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1707), 843–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. (2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 15–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C., Duncan, B., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of personality and Social Psychology 40(2), 290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijleveld, E., Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2009). The unconscious eye opener pupil dilation reveals strategic recruitment of resources upon presentation of subliminal reward cues. Psychological Science 20(11), 1313–1315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischof-Köhler, D. (1991). The development of empathy in infants. In M. E. Lamb & H. Keller (Eds.), Infant development: Perspectives from German speaking countries (pp. 245–273). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M., & Lang, P. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology 45(4), 602–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 773–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Hero Fund. (2014). http://carnegiehero.org/search-awardees, 28.7.2014.

  • Coke, J., Batson, C., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(7), 752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1874). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London, UK: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1909). The Origin of Species. New York, NY: Collier & Son. (Original work published 1859)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfield, K., & Kuhlmeier, V. (2010). Intention-mediated selective helping in infancy. Psychological Science 21(4), 523–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfield, K., Kuhlmeier, V. A., O’Connell, L., & Kelley, E. (2011). Examining the Diversity of Prosocial Behavior: Helping, Sharing, and Comforting in Infancy. Infancy 16(3), 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion 14(2), 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin 101(1), 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2005). Human altruism: proximate patterns and evolutionary origins. Analyse & Kritik 27(1), 6–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H., Henrich, J., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2008). Strong reciprocity and the roots of human morality. Social Justice Research 21(2), 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredebäck, G., & Melinder, A. (2010). Infants’ understanding of everyday social interactions: a dual process account. Cognition 114(2), 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of theoretical biology 7(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepach, R. (2012). The motivation of early benevolence: An investigation into a causal mechanism of cooperation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leipzig, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepach, R., & Westermann, G. (2013). Infants’ sensitivity to the congruence of others’ emotions and actions. Journal of experimental child psychology 115(1), 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepach, R., Vaish, A., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Young children are intrinsically motivated to see others helped. Psychological Science 23(9), 967–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepach, R., Vaish, A., & Tomasello, M. (2013a). A new look at children’s prosocial motivation. Infancy 18(1), 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepach, R., Vaish, A., & Tomasello, M. (2013b). Young children sympathize less in response to unjustified emotional distress. Developmental Psychology 49(6), 1132–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, P. D., Zahn-Waxler, C., & McShane, K. (2006). We are, by nature, moral creatures: Biological bases of concern for others. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 483 - 516). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (2002). Eine Untersuchung über die Prinzipien der Moral. Stuttgart, Germany: Reclam. (Reprinted from Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, 1777)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, I., & Sirois, S. (2009). Infant cognition: going full factorial with pupil dilation. Developmental Science 12(4), 670–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science 154, 1583–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1910). Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. London, UK: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the" overjustification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and social Psychology 28(1), 129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. M., Mallon, R., & DiCorcia, J. A. (2006). Transgressors, victims, and cry babies: Is basic moral judgment spared in autism? Social Neuroscience 1, 270–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1963). Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H. J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature 415(6870), 424–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., De Geus, E., & Aston-Jones, G. (2010). The anatomical and functional relationship between the p3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology 48(2), 162–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature 393(6685), 573–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozinga, J. R. (1999). Altruism. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchanathan, K., & Boyd, R. (2004). Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Nature 432(7016), 499–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S., & De Waal, F. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(01), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partala, T., & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(1), 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (1982). Little children’s participation in the work of adults, a nascent prosocial behavior. Child Development 53(1), 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radiolab. (2014). http://www.radiolab.org/story/104009-i-need-a-hero/, 28.07.2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. (2005). Cooperation through interdependence. Animal Behaviour 70(4), 901–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockenbach, B., & Milinski, M. (2006). The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Nature 444(7120), 718–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth-Hanania, R., Davidov, M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2011). Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: Early signs of concern for others. Infant Behavior and Development 34(3), 447–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (2010). Abhandlung über den Ursprung und die Grundlagen der Ungleichheit unter den Menschen. Stuttgart: Reclam. (Original work published 1755)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Beckes, L. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 35–54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1994). Theorie der moralischen Gefühle. Hamburg, Germany: Meiner. (Reprinted from The Theory of moral Sentiments, 1759)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., & Wilson, D. (1999). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetlova, M., Nichols, S., & Brownell, C. (2010). Toddlers’ prosocial behavior: From instrumental to empathic to altruistic helping. Child development 81(6), 1814–1827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation. Current Anthropology 53(6), 673–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly review of biology 46(1), 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Sympathy through affective perspective taking and its relation to prosocial behavior in toddlers. Developmental Psychology 45(2), 534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science 311(5765), 1301–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy 11(3), 271–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. Developmental psychology 44(6), 1785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2009). The roots of human altruism. British Journal of Psychology 100(3), 455–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Parental presence and encouragement do not influence helping in young children. Infancy 18(3), 345–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., Hare, B., Melis, A., Hanus, D., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS biology 5(7), e184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. P., & Mitani, J. C. (2002). Hunting behavior of chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale national Park, Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 23(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahn-Waxler, C., Radke-Yarrow, M., Wagner, E., & Chapman, M. (1992). Development of concern for others. Developmental psychology 28(1), 126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Leipzig, Germany

    Robert Hepach

Authors
  1. Robert Hepach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Hepach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IZEW, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Cordula Brand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hepach, R. (2016). Motive for Young Children’s Developing Concern for Others’ Well-Being as a Core Motive for Developing Prosocial Behavior. In: Brand, C. (eds) Dual-Process Theories in Moral Psychology. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12053-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation